Tamam al-MinnahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Among the obligatory acts of the prayer

In his documentation of the ḥadīth, “Whoever performs a prayer in which he does not recite Umm al-Qurʾān—in another wording: the Opening of the Book—his prayer is defective, defective, defective; it is not complete,” he writes: “Related by Aḥmad and the two Shaykhs.”

I say: two points need to be made here.

First: He attributed it to “the two Shaykhs,” which gives the impression that it is found in al-Bukhārī’s Ṣaḥīḥ. This is a mistake, for the narration is unique to Muslim; al-Bukhārī did not include it in his Ṣaḥīḥ. The likely source of the confusion is that al-Bukhārī recorded the report in his tract Juzʾ al-Qirāʾah and in his monograph Afʿāl al-ʿIbād. Either he himself, or someone who quoted him, then referred to the hadith as being “with al-Bukhārī” without specifying those two lesser works. That led to the error, because citing a report from those treatises does not imply its authenticity, whereas attributing it to “Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī” does. In scholarly convention, an unqualified reference to al-Bukhārī automatically means the Ṣaḥīḥ.

ومن فرائض الصلاة قوله في تخريج حديث: "من صلى صلاة لم يقرأ فيها بأم القرآن وفي رواية: بفاتحة الكتاب فهي خداج هي خداج هي خداج غير تمام": "رواه أحمد والشيخان". قلت: فيه مؤاخذتان: الأولى: أطلق العزو للشيخين فأوهم أنه عند البخاري في "الصحيح" وهو خطأ فإنه مما تفرد به مسلم دون البخاري ولعل سبب الوهم أن البخاري أخرجه في "جزء القراءة" وفي "أفعال العباد" فعزاه إليه هو أو من نقله عنه عزوا مطلقا غير مقيد ب "الجزء" و "الأفعال" فحصل الخطأ لأن العزو إليهما لا يعنى الصحة بخلاف العزول "صحيح البخاري" وهو المراد عند إطلاق العزو للبخاري في اصطلاح العلماء.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies