Tamam al-MinnahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Among the matters forbidden to a person in a state of major ritual impurity (janābah):

His statement: “ …nor is there any objection to touching something that merely contains Qur’anic verses—such as personal letters, books of exegesis, jurisprudence, and the like—for these are not called a muṣḥaf and therefore do not enjoy its sanctity.”

I say: This answer is built on the assumption that it is unlawful for the person in janābah to touch a muṣḥaf. The author, however, offers no proof for that here. He did allude, in the chapter “Cases that require minor ablution,” to the Prophet’s words, “Only the pure may touch the Qur’ān,” yet he also admitted there that the term ṭāhir (“pure”) is ambiguous and can bear several meanings, and that one must determine its intent by a clarifying context. He then applied it—without any supporting indication—to exclude only those in janābah. We have already rebutted him sufficiently in that section, clarified what the ḥadīth actually intends, and demonstrated that it does not prove a blanket prohibition on a believer touching the Qur’ān. Refer back to it.

The presumption of permissibility (barāʾah aṣliyyah) thus remains with those who allow a Muslim in janābah to handle the Qur’ān, and no sound report in this topic warrants abandoning that presumption. Reflect on this.

His statement: “It is forbidden, according to the majority, for the person in janābah to recite anything from the Qur’ān, on the strength of ʿAlī’s ḥadīth: ‘Nothing kept the Messenger of Allah ﷺ from the Qur’ān except janābah.’ It is reported by the compilers of the Sunan, and al-Tirmidhī and others declared it sound. Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in Fatḥ al-Bārī: ‘Some scholars have criticized certain narrators in its chain, yet in truth the report is ḥasan and suitable as evidence.’ ”

I reply: By no means; rather, it is weak and incapable of establishing proof, for it is uniquely transmitted by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salamah, and he experienced mental decline toward the end of his life—as al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar himself acknowledges in al-Taqrīb. It was in that impaired state that he narrated this ḥadīth, as has already been explained in the relevant chapter

ومن ما يحرم على الجنب قوله: " ... ولا مانع من مس ما اشتمل على آيات من القرآن كالرسائل وكتب التفسير والفقه وغيرها فإن هذه لا تسمى مصحفا ولا تثبت لها حرمته". قلت: هذا الجواب مبني على القول بحرمة مس المصحف من الجنب والمصنف لم يذكر دليلا عليه ههنا ولكنه أشار في "فصل: ما يجب له الوضوء" أن الدليل هو قوله ﷺ: "لا يمس القرآن إلا طاهر" مع أنه صرح هناك بأن لفظة "طاهر" مشترك يحتمل معاني شتى وأنه لا بد من حمله على معنى معين من قرينة ثم حمله هو على غير الجنب بغير قرينة وقد رددنا عليه هناك بما فيه كفاية وبينا المراد من الحديث هناك وأنه لا يدل على تحريم مس القرآن على المؤمن مطلقا. فراجعه. والبراءة الأصلية مع الذين قالوا بجواز مس القران من المسلم الجنب وليس في الباب نقل صحيح يجيز الخروج عنها. فتأمل. قوله: "يحرم على الجنب أن يقرأ شيئا من القرآن عند الجمهور لحديث علي أن رسول الله ﷺ كان لا يحجبه عن القرآن شيء ليس الجنابة رواه أصحاب السنن وصححه الترمذي وغيره قال الحافظ في "الفتح": وضعف بعضهم بعض رواته والحق أنه من قبيل الحسن يصلح للحجة". قلت: كلا بل هو من قبيل الضعيف الذي لا تقوم به حجة لأنه تفرد به عبد الله بن سلمة وقد كان تغير بآخر عمره باعتراف الحافظ ابن حجر نفسه في "التقريب" وفي هذه الحالة كان قد حدث بهذا الحديث كما سبق بيانه في فصل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies