Taqrib al-TadmuriyyahIbn al-'Uthaymin

Accordingly, whoever denies the perfections that the texts ascribe to Allah has transgressed against the Lord Himself. He has coupled the negation of divine attributes with likening Allah to defective or even non-existent entities, and his excessive denial may rise to the point of comparing the Almighty to what is utterly impossible.

He also wrongs the very texts of revelation: he strips them of the attributes of perfection they affirm for Allah and grafts onto them meanings of his own invention that their plain wording does not convey.

Thus, with respect to Allah’s attributes he combines both negation and anthropomorphism, and with respect to the Qur’an and Sunnah he combines distortion and nullification. He becomes one who deviates concerning Allah’s names and His signs, even though Allah has said, “To Allah belong the Most Beautiful Names, so call upon Him by them, and leave those who deviate concerning His names; they will be repaid for what they used to do” (Al-Aʿrāf 7:180), and, “Indeed, those who deviate concerning Our verses are not hidden from Us. Is the one who will be cast into the Fire better, or the one who comes secure on the Day of Resurrection? Do whatever you wish; He is All-Seeing of what you do” (Fussilat 41:40).

An example of this error is the statement that Allah has informed us that He rose over the Throne (istawā ʿalā al-ʿArsh). Someone may imagine that this rising resembles a human being’s mounting of a ship or a beast of burden, and that Allah therefore needs the Throne just as a rider needs his mount. By this corrupt analogy, if the animal stumbles the rider falls, and if the ship is breached the passenger drowns; accordingly, were the Throne to cease, they claim, the Lord would fall. On the strength of such reasoning they deny the reality of the divine rising.

The root of this misconception is the assumption that Allah’s rising over His Throne is like a human’s sitting on an animal or vessel. This assumption is false, for Allah has attributed the rising to His own majestic Self; He did not speak of an unrestricted rising that could apply to creatures, nor of any general rising that embraces them. It must therefore be a unique rising befitting Him—just as all His other attributes are uniquely His.

وحينئذٍ؛ يكون من نفى عن الله تعالى ما تقتضيه النصوص من صفات الكمال متعدياً في حق الله تعالى، حيث جمع بين نفي صفات الكمال عنه، وتمثيله بالمنقوصات والمعدومات، بل قد يرتقي به الغلو في النفي إلى تمثيله بالممتنعات المستحيلات. ويكون أيضاً جانياً على النصوص حيث عطلها عما دلت عليه من صفات الكمال لله تعالى، وأثبت لها معاني من عنده لا يدل عليها ظاهرها. فيجمع بين النفي والتمثيل في صفات الله، وبين التحريف والتعطيل في نصوص الكتاب والسنة، ويكون ملحداً في أسماء الله وآياته، وقد قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَلِلَّهِ الْأَسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَى فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا وَذَرُوا الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي أَسْمَائِهِ سَيُجْزَوْنَ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ﴾ [لأعراف: ١٨٠] . وقال: ﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي آيَاتِنَا لا يَخْفَوْنَ عَلَيْنَا أَفَمَنْ يُلْقَى فِي النَّارِ خَيْرٌ أَمَّنْ يَأْتِي آمِناً يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ اعْمَلُوا مَا شِئْتُمْ إِنَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ﴾ [فصلت:٤٠] . * مثال ذلك: أن الله تعالى أخبر عن نفسه أنه استوى على العرش فيتوهم واهم أنه كاستواء الإنسان على ظهور الفلك والأنعام، وأنه محتاج إلى العرش كحاجة الإنسان للأنعام والفلك، فلو عثرت الدابة لخر المستوي عليها، ولو انخرقت السفينة لغرق المستوي عليها، فقياس هذا أنه لو عدم العرش لسقط الرب - على قياسه الفاسد -, فينفي بذلك حقيقة الاستواء. ومنشأ هذا الوهم الذي توهمه في استواء الله على عرشه ظنه أنه مثل استواء الإنسان على ظهور الأنعام والفلك، وهذا ظن فاسد؛ لأن الله تعالى أضاف الاستواء إلى نفسه الكريمة، لم يذكر استواء مطلقاً يصلح للمخلوق، ولا عاماً يتناول المخلوق، فتعين أن يكون استواءً خاصاً يليق به؛ كسائر صفاته

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies