Taqrib al-TadmuriyyahIbn al-'Uthaymin

—is exalted above all things; this is part of His perfection and the perfection of His attributes. How, then, could such a meaning be dismissed as corrupt and therefore unintended?!

– Another example: His words, “Rather, both His Hands are outstretched; He spends as He wills” (al-Māʾidah 64).
They say: The apparent sense of the verse is that Allah possesses two real hands, and hands are bodily limbs; this is therefore a corrupt meaning and cannot be intended.
We reply: Affirming for Allah two real hands entails no corrupt meaning whatsoever. Allah possesses two true hands befitting His majesty and greatness; with them He gives, takes, and grasps, yet they bear no resemblance to the hands of created beings. This, too, is part of His perfection and the perfection of His attributes.

Allah the Exalted says, “They have not appraised Allah with the appraisal due to Him; on the Day of Resurrection the whole earth will be in His grasp and the heavens will be rolled up in His Right Hand” (al-Zumar 67).

And in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim it is related from Abū Hurayrah that the Prophet ﷺ said: “No one gives charity from lawful earnings—and Allah accepts only what is lawful—except that the Most Merciful takes it with His Right Hand. Even if it is a single date, He nurtures it in the Hand of the Most Merciful until it grows larger than a mountain.”

What corrupt implication can possibly arise from the apparent wording of these texts such that one would claim it is not intended?

*Both kinds of error can converge in a single example, as in the Prophet’s ﷺ statement: “Indeed, the hearts of all the children of Adam lie between two Fingers of the Merciful, like a single heart; He turns it wherever He wills.”
They said, with respect to the first error: The outward sense of the ḥadīth is that the hearts of the children of Adam are between the Fingers of the Merciful, which would necessitate direct contact and physical touch, and that the Fingers of Allah, glorified be He, are inside our chests. This, they claim, is a corrupt notion and therefore cannot be intended.

تعالى عالياً على كل شيء وهذا من كماله وكمال صفاته، فكيف يكون معنى فاسداً غير مراد؟! - مثال آخر: قوله تعالى: ﴿بَلْ يَدَاهُ مَبْسُوطَتَانِ يُنْفِقُ كَيْفَ يَشَاء﴾ [المائدة: ٦٤] . قالوا: فظاهر الآية أن الله تعالى يدين حقيقتين وهما جارحة، وهذا معنى فاسد فيكون غير مراد. فنقول: إن ثبوت اليدين الحقيقيتين لله ﷿ لا يستلزم معنى فاسداً، فإن لله تعالى يدين حقيقيتين تلقيان بجلاله وعظمته، وبهما يأخذ ويقبض، ولا تماثلان أيدي المخلوقين، وهذا من كماله وكمال صفاته. قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا قَدَرُوا اللَّهَ حَقَّ قَدْرِهِ وَالْأَرْضُ جَمِيعاً قَبْضَتُهُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ وَالسَّمَاوَاتُ مَطْوِيَّاتٌ بِيَمِينِهِ﴾ [الزمر: ٧] . وفي صحيح مسلم عن أبي هريرة ﵁ قال: قال النبي ﷺ: "ما تصدق أحد بصدقة من طيب – ولا يقبل الله إلا الطيب – إلا أخذها الرحمن بيمينه وإن كانت تمرة فتربو في كف الرحمن حتى تكون أعظم من الجبل". فأي معنى فاسد يلزم من ظاهر النص حتى يقال إنه غير مراد؟! *وقد يجتمع الخطأ من الوجهين: في مثال واحد مثل قوله ﷺ: "إن قلوب بني آدم كلها بين إصبعين من أصابع الرحمن كقلب واحد يصرفه حيث يشاء". فقالوا على الوجه الأول: ظاهر الحديث أن قلوب بني آدم بين أصابع الرحمن فيلزم منه المباشرة والمماسة، وأن تكون أصابع الله سبحانه داخل أجوافنا، وهذا معنى فاسد فيكون غير مراد.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies