Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Abū al-Ḥasan ibn al-Marzubān said: Abū Muḥammad ibn Māsi of Dār Kaʿb used to send Abū ʿUmar Ghulām Thaʿlab, time after time, enough for his personal expenses. Owing to an excuse he stopped the allowance for a while, then later dispatched the whole amount that had been due and wrote to him apologising. Abū ʿUmar returned the money and ordered that the following words be written on the back of his letter: “You honoured us and so took possession of us; then you turned away from us and thus gave us relief.” (1)

I say: What Abū ʿUmar said is correct, but his reply was not well-phrased. If the man had indeed gained mastery over him through his former generosity, that mastery still stands; the delay was made good by paying the entire sum at once and by his apology. Had he written instead, “then you left us and thereby set us free,” it would have been more fitting.

Al-Khaṭīb Abū Bakr, in his biographical entry on Abū ʿUmar the ascetic, said: “As for Ibn Māsi, I have no doubt that he is Ibrāhīm ibn Ayyūb, the father of Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd Allāh.” (2)

He also said: ʿAbbās ibn ʿUmar informed me, “I heard Abū ʿUmar the ascetic say: ‘Neglecting to fulfil the rights of one’s brethren is humiliation, while discharging their rights is elevation.’” (3)

Al-Khaṭīb added: I heard more than one person relate that the nobles and chancery-scribes used to frequent his gatherings in order to hear from him the books of Thaʿlab and others.

He possessed a fascicle in which he had compiled the merits of Muʿāwiyah; he would not allow anyone to read to him until they began by reading that fascicle. (4)

A number of the men of letters did not deem Abū ʿUmar reliable in the science of language until he said

(1) Tarikh Baghdad, 2/356. (2) Ibid.; see also the entry on Abu Muhammad in Tarikh Baghdad, 9/408–409. (3) Tarikh Baghdad, 2/356. The printed text says “the report from Abbas ibn Muhammad,” which is an error; the correct wording is given in the main text. (4) Tarikh Baghdad, 2/356–357.
قَالَ أَبُو الحَسَنِ ابنُ المَرْزُبَان: كَانَ أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ بنُ مَاسِي مِنْ دَار كعْب يُنفِذُ إِلَى أَبِي عُمَرَ غُلاَم ثَعْلَب وَقتاً بَعْد وَقت كفَايته مَا يُنْفِقُ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ، فَقطع ذَلِكَ عَنْهُ مُدَّة لعُذرٍ، ثُمَّ أَنفذَ إِلَيْهِ جُمْلَةَ مَا كَانَ فِي رَسْمه، وَكَتَبَ إِلَيْهِ يعتذرُ، فَرَدَّهُ وَأَمر أَنْ يُكْتَبَ عَلَى ظهر رُقْعته: أَكْرَمْتَنَا فملكْتَنَا، ثُمَّ أَعْرضْتَ عَنَّا، فَأَرَحْتَنَا (١) . قُلْتُ: هُوَ كَمَا قَالَ أَبُو عُمَرَ، لكنِّه لَمْ يُجْمِل فِي الردِّ، فَإِنْ كَانَ قَدْ مَلَكَه بِإِحسَانِه القَدِيْمِ، فَالتملُّكُ بحَاله، وَجُبر التَأخير بِمجيئه جُمْلَةً وَبَاعتذَارِه، وَلَوْ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: وَتركتنَا فَأَعَتَقْتَنَا، لكَانَ أَليَق. قَالَ الخَطِيْبُ أَبُو بَكْرٍ فِي تَرْجَمَة أَبِي عُمَرَ الزَّاهِد: ابْنُ مَاسِي لاَ أَشُكُّ أَنَّهُ إِبْرَاهِيْم بنُ أَيُّوْبَ، وَالد أَبِي مُحَمَّدٍ عَبْد اللهِ (٢) . قَالَ: وَأَخْبَرَنِي عَبَّاسُ بنُ عُمَرَ، سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عُمَرَ الزَّاهِد يَقُوْلُ: تَرْكُ قَضَاء حُقُوق الإِخْوَانِ مَذَلّة، وَفِي قَضَاء حُقُوقهُم رِفْعَة (٣) . قَالَ الخَطِيْبُ: سَمِعْتُ غَيْرَ وَاحدٍ يحكِي عَنْ أَبِي عُمَرَ أَنَّ الأَشرَافَ وَالكُتَّاب كَانُوا يحضُرُوْنَ عِنْدَهُ ليسمعُوا مِنْهُ كُتب ثَعْلَب، وَغيَرهَا. وَلَهُ (جُزْء) قَدْ جَمَع فِيْهِ فَضَائِل مُعَاوِيَة، فَكَانَ لاَ يتْرك وَاحِداً مِنْهُم يقرأُ عَلَيْهِ شَيْئاً حَتَّى يبتدِئَ بقرَاءة ذَلِكَ الجُزْء (٤) . وَكَانَ جَمَاعَة مِنْ أَهْلِ الأَدب لاَ يوثِّقُوْنَ أَبَا عُمَرَ فِي عِلْم اللُّغَة حَتَّى قَالَ
(١) " تاريخ بغداد ": ٢ / ٣٥٦. (٢) المصدر السابق، وانظر ترجمة أبي محمد في " تاريخ بغداد ": ٩ / ٤٠٨ - ٤٠٩. (٣) " تاريخ بغداد ": ٢ / ٣٥٦، وفيه: الخبر عن عباس بن محمد، وهو وهم، والصواب ما هو مثبت في الأصل. (٤) " تاريخ بغداد ": ٢ / ٣٥٦ - ٣٥٧.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies