Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

He studied under Abū Khalīfah al-Jumaḥī, Abū ʿAlī al-Jubbāʾī, Zakariyyā al-Sājī, Sahl ibn Nūḥ, and others of their rank, and he cites them at length—with full chains of transmission—in his Qurʾānic commentary.

His brilliance and penetrating understanding were truly remarkable.

Once he had mastered Muʿtazilite doctrine, he grew to abhor it, publicly renounced it, ascended the pulpit before the people, repented to Allah Most High, and thereafter devoted himself to rebutting the Muʿtazilah and exposing their flaws.

The jurist Abū Bakr al-Ṣayrafī said, “The Muʿtazilah had lifted their heads high—until al-Ashʿarī arose and shut them up in sesame husks.” (1)

Ibn al-Bāqillānī said, “My finest state is when I am able to grasp the speech of al-Ashʿarī.” (2)

I have seen four treatises by Abū al-Hasan on the principles of faith in which he lays out the foundations of the early scholars’ stance on the divine attributes, writing: “They are to be left as they have come.”

He then adds: “That is my position, it is the creed to which I devote myself, and they are not to be allegorically interpreted.”

He died in Baghdad in 324 AH. A group of Hanbalīs and other scholars spoke against him. (4)

Everyone’s statements are taken and left, except for the one whom Allah protects. O Allah, guide us and have mercy on us. (5)

(1) See al-Isaba, 1:363–364. (2) Tarikh Baghdad, 11:347. (3) Tabaqat al-Shafi‘iyyah, 3:351. (4) The expression hatt fi ʿird fulan means to launch into insulting him. (5) Al-Subki’s critique of al-Dhahabi in the latter’s entry on Abu al-Hasan al-Ashari is rather sharp. I have not located the entry on al-Ashari in the printed portions of al-Dhahabi’s Tarikh to which al-Subki refers. In truth, al-Dhahabi appears extremely balanced toward al-Ashari in the present book. Did he later revise his earlier opinion, or did al-Subki over-interpret al-Dhahabi’s words? See Tabaqat al-Shafi‘iyyah, 3:352–353, and the introduction to Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala, 1:128.
وَأَخَذَ عَنْ: أَبِي خَلِيْفَة الجُمَحِيِّ، وَأَبِي عَلِيٍّ الجُبَّائِيّ، وَزَكَرِيَّا السَّاجِيِّ، وَسَهْلِ بن نُوْح، وَطَبَقَتِهِم، يَرْوِي عَنْهُم بِالإِسْنَاد فِي تَفْسِيْره كَثِيْراً. وَكَانَ عجباً فِي الذَّكَاء، وَقوَة الفهمِ. وَلَمَّا بَرَعَ فِي مَعْرِفَةِ الاعتزَال، كرِهه وَتبرَّأَ مِنْهُ، وَصَعِدَ لِلنَّاسِ، فتَابَ إِلَى اللهِ تَعَالَى مِنْهُ، ثُمَّ أَخذ يُردُّ عَلَى المُعْتَزِلَة، وَيهتِك عِوَارَهُم. قَالَ الفَقِيْه أَبُو بَكْرٍ الصَّيْرَفِيُّ: كَانَتِ المُعْتَزِلَةُ قَدْ رفعُوا رُؤُوْسهُم، حَتَّى نشَأَ الأَشْعَرِيُّ فحجرهُم فِي أَقمَاع السِّمْسِم (١) . وَعَنِ ابْنِ البَاقلاَنِيِّ قَالَ: أَفْضَل أَحْوَالِي أَنْ أَفهَمَ كَلاَمَ الأَشْعَرِيّ (٢) . قُلْتُ: رَأَيْتُ لأَبِي الحَسَن أَرْبَعَة توَالِيف فِي الأُصُوْل يذكرُ فِيْهَا قوَاعدَ مَذْهَبِ السَّلَف فِي الصِّفَات، وَقَالَ فِيْهَا: تُمَرُّ كَمَا جَاءت. ثُمَّ قَالَ: وَبِذَلِكَ أَقُول، وَبِهِ أَدين، وَلاَ تُؤوَّل. قُلْتُ: مَاتَ بِبَغْدَادَ سَنَةَ أَرْبَعٍ وَعِشْرِيْنَ وَثَلاَثِ مائَةٍ، حطَّ (٤) عَلَيْهِ جَمَاعَةٌ مِنَ الحَنَابِلَة وَالعُلَمَاء. وَكُلُّ أَحَد فيُؤخذ مِنْ قَوْله وَيترك، إِلاَّ مَنْ عصم اللهُ تَعَالَى اللَّهُمَّ اهدنَا، وَارحمنَا (٥) .
(١) انظر " الإصابة ": ١ / ٣٦٣ - ٣٦٤. (٢) " تاريخ بغداد ": ١١ / ٣٤٧. (٣) " طبقات الشافعية ": ٣ / ٣٥١. (٤) يقال: حط في عرض فلان: إذا اندفع في شتمه. (٥) في تناول السبكي للذهبي في ترجمته لأبي الحسن الأشعري شيء من الحدة في النقد، ولم أقع على ترجمة الأشعري في ما طبع من " تاريخ الذهبي " الذي أشار إليه السبكي، والحق، أن الذهبي كان في غاية الاعتدال حين ترجم للاشعري في كتابنا هذا، ترى هل رجع عما كان يعتقده في حقه، أم أن السبكي أفرط في تأويل كلام الذهبي؟. انظر " طبقات الشافعية ": ٣ / ٣٥٢ - ٣٥٣، ومقدمة سير أعلام النبلاء: ١ / ١٢٨.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies