Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

I said: This story demonstrates Abū al-Qāsim’s careful verification and piety; for had he wished to cut corners—and, by way of tadlīs, reported it from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab, his teacher—who would have stopped him?!

Then al-Naqqāsh said: “I noticed in him a sense of humility and distress, and he was trustworthy.”

I add: The wording of the ḥadīth is: “The Messenger of Allah ﷺ forbade two people from conversing privately to the exclusion of a third when all three are together.” (1)

Abū al-ʿAbbās al-Sarrāj also transmitted it: “Ibrāhīm ibn Hāniʾ informed us,” and he mentioned the ḥadīth.

Al-Ardabīlī said: Ibn Abī Ḥātim was asked about Abū al-Qāsim al-Baghawī—“Does he qualify for inclusion among the authentic narrators?” He replied, “Yes.”

Hamzah al-Sahmī reported: I asked Abū Bakr ibn ʿAbdān about al-Baghawī, and he said, “There is no doubt that he is counted among those whose reports are ṣaḥīḥ.”

With this same chain, Abū Bakr said: Ḥamzah ibn Muḥammad al-Daqqāq narrated to us: I heard al-Dāraqutnī say,

“Abū al-Qāsim ibn Manīʿ seldom spoke about a ḥadīth, but when he did, his words were like a nail driven into seasoned wood.”

Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Sulamī said: I asked al-Dāraqutnī about al-Baghawī, and he replied, “Trustworthy, a mountain, an imām among the imāms, firmly grounded, the least of the shaykhs in error, and his words on…"

(1) Tarikh Baghdad, vol. 10, p. 116. The hadith is reported through Nafiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar by: Malik, al-Muwattaʾ, vol. 3, pp. 151-152; al-Bukhari, Ṣaḥiḥ, Book of Seeking Permission, chapter “Two must not converse privately to the exclusion of a third,” vol. 11, p. 68; Muslim, Ṣaḥiḥ, no. 2183, Book of Greetings, chapter “The prohibition of two speaking privately without the third”; and Aḥmad, Musnad, vol. 2, pp. 32, 121, 123, 126, 141. It is also transmitted through two chains from ʿAbd Allah ibn Dinar, from Ibn ʿUmar: Malik, al-Muwattaʾ, vol. 3, p. 151; Aḥmad, Musnad, vol. 2, pp. 9, 73, 79; and Ibn Majah, Sunan, no. 3776. A further isnad is given by Aḥmad, Musnad, vol. 2, p. 141, and Abu Dawud, Sunan, no. 4852, from al-Aʿmash, from Abu Ṣaliḥ, from Ibn ʿUmar.
قُلْتُ: هَذِهِ الحِكَايَةُ تَدُلُّ عَلَى تَثَبُّتِ أَبِي القَاسِمِ وَوَرَعِهِ، وَإِلاَّ فَلَوْ كَاشَرَ - وَرَوَاهُ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ عَبْدِ الوَاهِبِ - شَيْخه عَلَى سَبِيْلِ التَّدْلِيْسِ مَنْ كَانَ يَمنَعُهُ؟! ثُمَّ قَالَ النَّقَّاشُ: وَرَأَيْتُ فِيْهِ الانْكِسَارَ وَالغَمَّ، وَكَانَ ثِقَةً. قُلْتُ: مَتْنُ الحَدِيْثِ: نَهَى رَسُوْلُ اللهِ ﷺ أَنْ يَتَنَاجَى اثْنَانِ دُوْنَ الثَّالِثِ إِذَا كَانُوا جَمِيْعاً (١) . وَرَوَاهُ: أَبُو العَبَّاسِ السَّرَّاجُ، أَخْبَرَنَا إِبْرَاهِيْمُ بنُ هَانِئٍ، فَذَكَرَهُ. وَقَالَ الأَرْدَبِيْلِيُّ: سُئِلَ ابْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ عَنْ أَبِي القَاسِمِ البَغَوِيِّ: أَيَدخُلُ فِي الصَّحِيْحِ؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ. وَقَالَ حَمْزَةُ السَّهْمِيُّ: سَأَلْتُ أَبَا بَكْرٍ بنَ عَبْدَانَ عَنِ البَغَوِيِّ، فَقَالَ: لاَ شَكَّ أَنَّهُ يَدْخُلُ فِي الصَّحِيْحِ. وَبِهِ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ: حَدَّثَنَا حَمْزَةُ بنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الدَّقَّاقُ: سَمِعْتُ الدَّارَقُطْنِيَّ يَقُوْلُ: كَانَ أَبُو القَاسِمِ بنُ مَنِيْعٍ قَلَّ مَا يَتَكَلَّمُ عَلَى الحَدِيْثِ، فَإِذَا تَكَلَّمَ، كَانَ كَلاَمُهُ كَالمِسمَارِ فِي السَّاجِ. وَقَالَ أَبُو عَبْد الرَّحْمَنِ السُّلَمِيُّ: سَأَلتُ الدَّارَقُطْنِيَّ عَنِ البَغَوِيِّ، فَقَالَ: ثِقَةٌ، جَبَلٌ، إِمَامٌ مِنَ الأَئِمَّةِ، ثَبْتٌ، أَقَلُّ المَشَايِخِ خَطَأً، وَكَلاَمُهُ فِي
(١) " تاريخ بغداد " ١٠ / ١١٦، والحديث أخرجه من طريق نافع، عن ابن عمر: مالك في " الموطأ " ٣ / ١٥٢ ١٥١، والبخاري: ١١ / ٦٨ في الاستئذان: باب لا يتناجى اثنان دون الثالث، ومسلم (٢١٨٣) في السلام: باب تحريم مناجاة الاثنين دون الثالث، وأحمد: ٢ / ٣٢، و١٢١، و١٢٣، و١٢٦، و١٤١. وأخرجه مالك: ٣ / ١٥١، وأحمد: ٢ / ٩، و٧٣، و٧٩، وابن ماجه (٣٧٧٦) من طريقين عن عبد الله بن دينار، عن ابن عمر. وأخرجه أحمد: ٢ / ١٤١، وأبو داود (٤٨٥٢) من طريق الأعمش، عن أبي صالح، عن ابن عمر.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies