Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

and ʿAlī ibn Ḥarb al-Jundaysābūrī; al-Faḍl ibn Yaʿqūb al-Rukhāmī, the ḥāfiẓ; the muḥaddith ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī al-Khaṣīb; the muḥaddith Ismāʿīl ibn Abī al-Ḥārith; Aḥmad ibn ʿUmar Ḥamdān, the cloth-merchant; and others besides.

Indeed, the one who washed Ibn al-Furāt was his companion Muḥammad ibn ʿĀṣim al-Thaqafī, the devoted ascetic and possessor of that booklet with the lofty isnād.

At the end of Ibn al-Furāt’s manuscript there is additional material that came into the hands of Yaḥyā al-Thaqafī.

Abū Muḥammad ibn Fāris said, “I heard from Abū Masʿūd in the year 254 AH.” He added, “He passed away in 256 AH.”

That is what he reported; however, the year 258 is more accurate, and that is the only date the ḥāfiẓ Ibn ʿAsākir cites.

The ḥāfiẓ Abū Nuʿaym said, “Abū Masʿūd was one of the leading imams and ḥuffāẓ. He compiled the Musnad and other works, and he taught in Isfahan for forty-five years. He had arrived in Isfahan before travelling on to Iraq, during the governorship of al-Ḥusayn ibn Ḥafṣ.”

I say: In fact, his first journey was to Iraq before the year 200 AH, where he met ʿAbd Allāh ibn Numayr and his cohort.

Ibn ʿAdī states in al-Kāmil: “I heard Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Saʿīd say, ‘I heard Ibn Khirāsh swear by Allah that Aḥmad ibn al-Furāt lies deliberately.’” Ibn ʿAdī then remarked, “That is over-harsh; I know of no report from him that is objectionable.”

I say: Who would believe Ibn Khirāsh—the Rāfiḍī—in such a claim (1)?!

(1) In Mizaan al-muallif, 1/128: Ibn Adi criticized him unjustly; his sole proof was a report from Ibn Aqda, quoting Ibn Kharrash—both of whom were charged with rafd (Shiʿite deviation) and bidʿa (innovation)—saying that Ibn al-Furat deliberately fabricates. Ibn Adi himself, however, states: “I know of no faulty narration from him.” Consequently, Ibn Kharrash’s accusation is void.
وَعَلِيُّ بنُ حَرْبٍ الجُنْدَيْسَابورِيُّ، وَالفَضْلُ بنُ يَعْقُوْبَ الرُّخَامِيُّ الحَافِظُ، وَالمُحَدِّثُ عَلِيُّ بنُ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ أَبِي الخَصِيبِ، وَالمُحَدِّثُ إِسْمَاعِيْلُ بنُ أَبِي الحَارِثِ، وَأَحْمَدُ بنُ عُمَرَ حَمْدَانُ البَزَّازُ، وَآخَرُوْنَ. نَعَمْ، وَغَسَّلَ ابْنَ الفُرَاتِ رَفِيْقُهُ مُحَمَّدُ بنُ عَاصِمٍ الثَّقَفِيُّ العَابِدُ، صَاحِبُ ذَلِكَ الجُزْءِ العَالِي. وفِي آخرِ نُسْخَةِ ابْنِ الفُرَاتِ مِمَّا وَقَعَ زَائِداً عِنْدَ يَحْيَى الثَّقَفِيِّ. قَالَ أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ بنُ فَارِسٍ: سَمِعْتُ مِنْ أَبِي مَسْعُوْدٍ، سَنَةَ أَرْبَعٍ وَخَمْسِيْنَ وَمائَتَيْنِ. قَالَ: وَتُوُفِّيَ: سَنَةَ سِتٍّ وَخَمْسِيْنَ. كَذَا قَالَ: وَسنَةُ ثَمَانٍ أَصحُّ، وَمَا ذَكَرَ الحَافِظُ ابْنُ عَسَاكِرَ سِوَاهُ. قَالَ أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ الحَافِظُ: أَبُو مَسْعُوْدٍ أَحَدُ الأَئِمَّةِ وَالحُفَّاظِ، صَنَّفَ (المُسْنَدَ) وَالكُتُبَ، وَحدَّثَ بِأَصْبَهَانَ خَمْساً وَأَرْبَعِيْنَ سَنَةً، وَكَانَ قَدِمَ أَصْبَهَانَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يرتحلَ إِلَى العِرَاقِ، فِي أَيَّامِ الحُسَيْنِ بنِ حَفْصٍ. قُلْتُ: إِنَّمَا ارْتَحَلَ أَوَّلاً إِلَى العِرَاقِ قَبْلَ المائَتَيْنِ، وَلَحِقَ عَبْدَ اللهِ بنَ نُمَيْرٍ، وَطبقتَهُ. قَالَ ابْنُ عَدِيٍّ فِي (الكَامِلِ) : سَمِعْتُ أَحْمَدَ بنَ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ سَعِيْدٍ، سَمِعْتُ ابْنَ خِرَاشٍ يَحْلِفُ بِاللهِ إِنَّ أَحْمَدَ بنَ الفُرَاتِ يَكْذبُ مُتَعَمِّداً. فَقَالَ ابْنُ عَدِيٍّ: وَهَذَا تحَامُلٌ، وَلاَ أَعْلَمُ لَهُ رِوَايَةً مُنْكرَةً. قُلْتُ: مَنِ الَّذِي يُصَدِّقُ ابْنَ خِرَاشٍ ذَاكَ الرَّافِضِيُّ فِي قَوْلِهِ (١) ؟!
(١) في " ميزان المؤلف " ١ / ١٢٨: ذكره ابن عدي فأساء، فإنه ما أبدى شيئا غير أن ابن عقدة روى عن ابن خراش - وفيهما رفض وبدعة - قال: إن ابن الفرات يكذب عمدا، وقال ابن عدي: لا أعرف له رواية منكرة. قلت: فبطل قول ابن خراش.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies