Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

five hundred hadiths, or even more. (1)

He went on: “I heard Abū ʿAbd Allāh say, ‘I reflected on the transmitters of Anas, and within a single sitting three hundred of them came to mind.’

He also said, ‘I never visited anyone without his gaining from me more than I gained from him.’ (2)

He further related from Sulaim ibn Mujāhid, who heard Abū al-Azhar say: ‘In Samarkand there were four hundred students of hadith. They gathered for seven days, intent on catching Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl in error. They blended Syrian isnads with Iraqi ones and Yemeni isnads with those of the Two Sanctuaries, yet they could not pin on him a single slip—neither in the chain of transmission nor in the text.’ (3)

Al-Firabrī said: “I heard Abū ʿAbd Allāh confess, ‘I never regarded myself as small before anyone except ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī, though I would occasionally narrate to him reports that were unfamiliar to him.’” (4)

Ahyad ibn Abī Jaʿfar, the governor of Bukhārā, recounted: “Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl once observed, ‘More than once I heard a hadith in Basra but did not write it down until I was in Syria, and I heard a hadith in Syria but only recorded it in Egypt.’ I asked him, ‘O Abū ʿAbd Allāh, did you record it in its entirety?’ He fell silent.” (5)

(1) The report is cited in the Muqaddimat al-Fath, p. 489; Ibn Hajar uses it here to show the breadth of al-Bukhari’s memorisation. (2) Muqaddimat al-Fath, p. 489. (3) Muqaddimat al-Fath, p. 487. (4) Tarikh Baghdad, 2:17–18; Tahdhib al-Asma wa-l-Lughat, 1:69/1; Tahdhib al-Kamal, p. 1170; Muqaddimat al-Fath, p. 484. (5) This indicates that al-Bukhari considered it permissible to transmit a hadith according to its meaning and to quote only segments of it without explicitly noting the abridgement, unlike Muslim. Because al-Bukhari composed his book while travelling for many years, he sometimes recorded a hadith from memory, reproducing its sense rather than its complete wording.
حَدِيْثٍ أَوْ أَكْثَرُ (١) . وَقَالَ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللهِ يَقُوْلُ: تَفَكَّرْتُ أَصْحَابَ أَنَسٍ، فَحضرنِي فِي سَاعَةٍ ثَلاَثُ مَائةٍ. قَالَ: وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُوْلُ: مَا قَدِمْتُ عَلَى أَحَدٍ إِلاَّ كَانَ انتفَاعُهُ بِي أَكْثَر مِنِ انتفَاعِي بِهِ (٢) . قَالَ: وَسَمِعْتُ سُلَيْمَ بنَ مُجَاهدٍ، سَمِعْتُ أَبَا الأَزْهَرِ يَقُوْلُ: كَانَ بِسَمَرْقَنْدَ أَرْبَعُ مائَةٍ مِمَّنْ يطلُبُونَ الحَدِيْثَ، فَاجْتَمَعُوا سَبْعَةَ أَيَّامٍ، وَأَحَبُّوا مُغَالطَةَ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ إِسْمَاعِيْلَ، فَأَدخلُوا إِسْنَادَ الشَّامِ فِي إِسْنَادِ العِرَاقِ، وَإِسْنَادَ اليَمَنِ فِي إِسْنَادِ الحَرَمَيْنِ، فَمَا تَعَلَّقُوا مِنْهُ بِسَقْطَةٍ لاَ فِي الإِسْنَادِ، وَلاَ فِي المَتْنِ (٣) . وَقَالَ الفِرَبْرِيُّ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللهِ يَقُوْلُ: مَا اسْتصغرتُ نَفْسِي عِنْدَ أَحَدٍ إِلاَّ عِنْدَ عَلِيِّ بنِ المَدِيْنِيِّ، وَرُبَّمَا كُنْتُ أُغْرِبُ عَلَيْهِ (٤) . وَقَالَ أَحْيَدُ بنُ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ وَالِي بُخَارَى: قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بنُ إِسْمَاعِيْلَ يَوْماً: رُبَّ حَدِيْثٍ سَمِعْتُهُ بِالبَصْرَةِ كَتَبْتُهُ بِالشَّامِ، وَرُبَّ حَدِيْثٍ سَمِعْتُهُ بِالشَّامِ كَتَبْتُهُ بِمِصْرَ. فَقُلْتُ لَهُ: يَا أَبَا عَبْدِ اللهِ بكَمَالِهِ؟ قَالَ: فَسَكَتَ (٥) .
(١) الخبر في " مقدمة الفتح ": ٤٨٩. وهو يدلل في هذا على سعة حفظه. (٢) " مقدمة الفتح ": ٤٨٩. (٣) " مقدمة الفتح ": ٤٨٧. (٤) " تاريخ بغداد " ٢ / ١٧، ١٨، و" تهذيب الأسماء واللغات " ١ / ٦٩ / ١، و" تهذيب الكمال ": ١١٧٠ و" مقدمة الفتح ": ٤٨٤. (٥) ويعني هذا ان البخاري يرى جواز الرواية بالمعنى، وجواز تقطيع الحديث من غير تنصيص على اختصاره بخلاف مسلم. وسبب ذلك أن البخاري صنف كتابه في طول رحلته، فكان لاجل هذا ربما كتب الحديث من حفظه، فلا يسوق ألفاظه برمتها، بل يتصرف فيه، =

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies