Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

al-Raḥmān, Ibn Dhakwān, and Ibn Abī al-Ḥawārī as well. He put them through an interrogation that was not particularly severe; they all responded except Aḥmad ibn Abī al-Ḥawārī. The governor then tried to coax him and kept saying, “Are not the heavens a created thing? Is not the earth a created thing?”

Aḥmad still refused to yield, so he was jailed in the Dār al-Ḥijārah prison. After some time he gave the required answer and was released.

Aḥmad al-Sulamī states in his book “The Trials of the Sufis”: “People testified against Aḥmad ibn Abī al-Ḥawārī, alleging that he preferred the awliyāʾ (God’s friends) over the prophets, and they produced written affidavits. He therefore fled from Damascus to Mecca, remained in the sanctuary, and did not return until the ruler wrote to him asking him to come back—so he returned.”

I say: If this story is sound, then it is one of their fabrications against Aḥmad; he knew Allah too well to make such a claim.

Al-Sulamī also passed on a dubious tale from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh, and Ibn Bakawayh transmitted it from Abū Bakr al-Ghāzī; both of them had heard it from Abū Bakr al-Shabbāk. I heard Yūsuf ibn al-Ḥusayn say:

“There was a covenant between Abū Sulaymān al-Dārānī and Aḥmad ibn Abī al-Ḥawārī that Aḥmad would not oppose him in anything. One day Aḥmad came to him while he was addressing his gathering and said, ‘The oven has been set ablaze; what do you command?’

Abū Sulaymān gave him no reply. Aḥmad repeated the question two or three times, whereupon Abū Sulaymān—apparently annoyed—said, ‘Go and sit in it.’

Abū Sulaymān then became distracted for a while. Remembering, he said, ‘Look for Aḥmad—he is in the oven, because he is bound by the pact not to counter my word.’ They looked and found him sitting inside the oven, without a single hair of his head having been singed.”

(1) This view is mistaken and should neither be adopted nor relied upon. In Islam a person may not conclude a binding pact of perpetual non-contradiction with someone else, because the other party is not infallible and may eventually command what is unlawful. The Prophet’s saying, “Innama al-taʿatu fi al-maʿruf” (“obedience is only in what is right”) is the clearest refutation of such a pledge. Sources: Abu Nuʿaym, Tabaqat al-Awliyaʾ, p. 33; Ibn Kathir, al-Tarikh, vol. 10, p. 348.
الرَّحْمَنِ، وَابْنَ ذَكْوَانَ، وَابْنَ أَبِي الحَوَارِيِّ، فَامْتَحَنَهُمُ امْتِحَاناً لَيْسَ بِالشَّدِيْدِ، فَأَجَابُوا خَلاَ أَحْمَدَ بنَ أَبِي الحَوَارِيِّ، فَجَعَلَ يَرْفُقُ بِهِ، وَيَقُوْلُ: أَليْسَ السَّمَاوَاتُ مَخْلُوْقَةً؟ أَلَيْسَ الأَرْضُ مَخْلُوْقَةً. وَأَحْمَدُ يَأْبَى أَنْ يُطِيْعَهُ، فَسَجَنَهُ فِي دَارِ الحِجَارَةِ، ثُمَّ أَجَابَ بَعْدُ، فَأَطْلَقَهُ. قَالَ أَحْمَدُ السُّلَمِيُّ فِي (مِحَنِ الصُّوْفِيَّةِ) : أَحْمَدُ بنُ أَبِي الحَوَارِيِّ شَهِدَ عَلَيْهِ قَوْمٌ أَنَّهُ يُفَضِّلُ الأَوْلِيَاءَ عَلَى الأَنْبِيَاءِ، وَبَذَلُوا الخُطُوطَ عَلَيْهِ، فَهَرَبَ مِنْ دِمَشْقَ إِلَى مَكَّةَ، وَجَاوَرَ حَتَّى كَتَبَ إِلَيْهِ السُّلْطَانُ يَسْأَلُهُ أَنْ يَرْجِعَ، فَرَجَعَ. قُلْتُ: إِنْ صَحَّتِ الحِكَايَةُ، فَهَذَا مِنْ كَذِبِهِم عَلَى أَحْمَدَ، هُوَ كَانَ أَعْلَمَ بِاللهِ مِنْ أَنْ يَقُوْلَ ذَلِكَ. وَنَقَلَ السُّلَمِيُّ حِكَايَةً مُنْكَرَةً، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ، وَنَقَلَهَا ابْنُ بَاكَوَيْه، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرٍ الغَازِيِّ، سَمِعَا أَبَا بَكْرٍ الشَّبَّاكَ، سَمِعْتُ يُوْسُفَ بنَ الحُسَيْنِ يَقُوْلُ: كَانَ بَيْنَ أَبِي سُلَيْمَانَ الدَّارَانِيِّ وَأَحْمَدَ بنِ أَبِي الحَوَارِيِّ عَقْدٌ لاَ يُخَالِفُهُ فِي أَمْرٍ، فَجَاءهُ يَوْماً وَهُوَ يَتَكَلَّمُ فِي مَجْلِسِهِ، فَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ: إِنَّ التَّنُّوْرَ قَدْ سُجِرَ، فَمَا تَأْمُرُ؟ فَلَمْ يُجِبْهُ، فَأَعَادَ مَرَّتَيْنِ أَوْ ثَلاَثاً، فَقَالَ: اذْهَبْ، فَاقْعُدْ فِيْهِ - كَأَنَّهُ ضَاقَ بِهِ -. وَتَغَافَلَ أَبُو سُلَيْمَانَ سَاعَةً، ثُمَّ ذَكَرَ، فَقَالَ: اطْلُبُوا أَحْمَدَ، فَإِنَّهُ فِي التَّنُّوْرِ؛ لأَنَّهُ عَلَى عَقْدٍ أَنْ لاَ يُخَالِفَنِي، فَنَظَرُوا فَإِذَا هُوَ فِي التَّنُّوْرِ لَمْ يَحْتَرِقْ مِنْهُ شَعْرَةٌ.
(١) وهذا من الخطأ الذي لا ينبغي الاخذ به، ولا التعويل عليه، لأنه لا يجوز في دين الإسلام أن يعقد الإنسان بينه وبين آخر عقدا يلتزم فيه عدم المخالفة بصورة دائمة، لان ذاك الإنسان الذي عاهده على عدم المخالفة ليس بمعصوم، فقد يأمره بما لا يجوز. وفي قول رسول الله ﷺ: " إنما الطاعة في المعروف " أبلغ رد على هذا. والخبر في " طبقات الأولياء ": ٣٣، و" تاريخ ابن كثير " ١٠ / ٣٤٨.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies