Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

there was no one on earth who transmitted more material from his father than ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad, for he heard from him the Musnad—thirty thousand reports—and the Tafsīr—one hundred and twenty thousand reports. Of the latter he heard two-thirds, while the remainder he obtained only from written copies (1).

Ibn al-Sammāk relates: Ḥanbal told us:
‘Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal gathered the three of us—myself, Ṣāliḥ, and ʿAbd Allāh—and read the Musnad to us, material that no one else had heard.’

He then said, ‘I compiled and selected this book from more than seven hundred and fifty thousand narrations. Whenever the Muslims disagree about any ḥadith of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, refer to it: if you find the report here, accept it; if not, it carries no weight as evidence.’

I say: There are a few ḥadiths in the two Ṣaḥīḥs that are not found in the Musnad. Yet this does not contradict his statement, for the Muslims have never differed over those particular reports. Nor does his remark imply that everything contained in the Musnad is automatically authoritative: it includes a number of weak narrations that may be cited but not relied upon as proof, and a handful that verge on fabrication—yet they are but a drop in the ocean (2).

Within the Musnad there are also numerous additions inserted by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad.

Ibn al-Jawzī said: Among the works he—that is, Abū ʿAbd Allāh—authored are:

(1) Al-wijada refers to locating hadiths in the handwriting of their original narrator—whether or not one actually met or heard that narrator—or finding them in the works of well-known authors. In all such cases, one may not transmit the material as though one received it directly from the narrator; rather one should say, “I found this in the handwriting of so-and-so,” once the script is recognized and deemed reliable, or simply, “So-and-so stated…,” and the like. The leading scholars hold that it is permissible—indeed required—to act upon such texts when the reader is confident of their authenticity: either certain that the manuscript is genuinely in the shaykh’s own hand, or that the book being consulted is securely attributed to its trustworthy author, and on condition that the isnad (chain of transmission) itself is sound. (2) Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar composed a rebuttal to those who claimed that Ahmad’s Musnad contains fabricated reports; he entitled it al-Qawl al-musaddad fi al-dhabb ‘an Musnad Ahmad. The treatise has been published in India.
يكُنْ أَحَدٌ أَرْوَى فِي الدُّنْيَا عَنِ أَبِيْهِ مِنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بنِ أَحْمَدَ؛ لأَنَّه سَمِعَ مِنْهُ (المُسْنَدَ) وَهُوَ ثَلاَثُوْنَ أَلْفاً، وَ (التَّفْسِيْرَ) وَهُوَ مائَةٌ وَعِشْرُوْنَ أَلْفاً، سَمِعَ ثُلُثَيْهِ، وَالبَاقِي وِجَادَةٌ (١) . ابْنُ السَّمَّاكِ: حَدَّثَنَا حَنْبَلٌ، قَالَ: جَمَعَنَا أَحْمَدُ بنُ حَنْبَلٍ، أَنَا وَصَالِحٌ وَعَبْدُ اللهِ، وَقَرَأَ عَلَيْنَا (المُسْنَدَ) ، مَا سَمِعَهُ غَيْرُنَا. وَقَالَ: هَذَا الكِتَابُ جَمَعتُهُ وَانتَقَيتُهُ مِنْ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ سَبْعِ مائَةِ أَلْفٍ وَخَمْسِيْنَ أَلْفاً، فَمَا اختَلَفَ المُسْلِمُوْنَ فِيْهِ مِنْ حَدِيْثِ رَسُوْلِ اللهِ ﷺ فَارْجِعُوا إِلَيْهِ، فَإِنْ وَجَدتُمُوهُ فِيْهِ، وَإِلاَّ فَلَيْسَ بِحُجَّةٍ. قُلْتُ: فِي (الصَّحِيْحَيْنِ) أَحَادِيْثُ قَلِيْلَةٌ لَيْسَتْ فِي (المُسْنَدِ) . لَكِنْ قَدْ يُقَالُ: لاَ تَرِدُ عَلَى قَوْلِهِ، فَإِنَّ المُسْلِمِيْنَ مَا اخْتَلَفُوا فِيْهَا، ثُمَّ مَا يَلزَمُ مِنْ هَذَا القَوْلِ: أَنَّ مَا وُجِدَ فِيْهِ أَنْ يَكُوْنَ حُجَّةً، فَفِيْهِ جُمْلَةٌ مِنَ الأَحَادِيْثِ الضَّعِيفَةِ مِمَّا يَسُوغُ نَقلُهَا، وَلاَ يَجِبُ الاحْتِجَاجُ بِهَا، وَفِيْهِ أَحَادِيْثُ مَعْدُوْدَةٌ شِبْهُ مَوْضُوْعَةٍ، وَلَكِنَّهَا قَطْرَةٌ فِي بَحرٍ (٢) . وَفِي غُضُوْنِ (المُسْنَدِ) زِيَادَاتٌ جَمَّةٌ لِعَبْدِ اللهِ بنِ أَحْمَدَ. قَالَ ابْنُ الجَوْزِيِّ: وَلَهُ -يَعْنِي: أَبَا عَبْدِ اللهِ- مِنَ المُصَنَّفَاتِ:
(١) الوجادة: هي أن يجد الشخص أحاديث بخط راويها، سواء لقيه أو سمع منه، أم لم يلقه ولم يسمع منه، أو أن يجد أحاديث في كتب المؤلفين المعروفين. ففي هذه الانواع كلها لا يجوز له أن يرويها عن أصحابها، بل يقول: وجدت بخط فلان، إذا عرف الخط، ووثق منه. أو يقول: قال فلان، أو نحو ذلك. والذي عليه المحققون من أهل العلم وجوب العمل بها عند حصول الثقة بما يجده القارئ، أي يثق بأن هذا الخبر أو الحديث بخط الشيخ الذي يعرفه، أو يثق بأن الكتاب الذي ينقل منه ثابت النسبة إلى مؤلفه الثقة المأمون، وأن يكون إسناد الخبر صحيحا. (٢) للحافظ ابن حجر رسالة رد بها على من ادعى أن في المسند أحاديث موضوعة وسمها ب " القول المسدد في الذب عن مسند أحمد ". وهي مطبوعة في الهند.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies