Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Some uninformed people have claimed that Ibn Kullāb introduced his innovations in order to smuggle Christian doctrine into our religion, and that he did so to gratify his sister. This is baseless. Of all the theologians he was the closest to the Sunnah—indeed, in their debates he stood at the forefront (1).

He used to say that the Qur’an subsists in the Divine Essence, without (being described by) power or will. No one before him had ever made such a statement; he advanced it only to counter those who maintained that the Qur’an is created.

He authored works on tawḥīd, on affirming the divine attributes, and on the fact that the Exalted One’s elevation above His creation is known by innate disposition and by sound reason in accordance with revelation. Al-Muḥāsibī affirmed the same point in his book Fahm al-Qur’ān.

I have not discovered a precise date for Ibn Kullāb’s death, but he was still alive sometime before 240 AH.

Ibn al-Najjār offered a biographical notice for him, though without due scrutiny. He said that Ibn Kullāb lived in the time of al-Junayd, heard some of the Sufi expressions, marvelled at them, and stood in awe of al-Junayd.

Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq al-Nadīm said: “Ibn Kullāb was one of the offshoots of the Ḥashwiyya. He held debates with ʿAbbād ibn Salmān in which he would say, ‘The speech of Allah is Allah.’ ʿAbbād replied, ‘With that statement he is a Christian.’ ”

Abū al-ʿAbbās al-Baghawī reported: “Faythūn the Christian said to me, ‘May Allah have mercy on ʿAbd Allah; he used to come to the church, take knowledge from me, and had he lived longer, we would have converted the Muslims.’ ”

Someone asked Faythūn, “What do you say about the Messiah?” He answered, “Exactly what the people of your Sunnah say about the Qur’an.”

(1) He was the foremost imam of Ahl al-Sunna (the Sunnite community) in his era and its principal authority. Imam al-Haramayn (d. 478 AH) states in his work al-Irshad, p. 119, that he was “one of our scholars.” Al-Subki, in his Tabaqat, calls him “one of the leading mutakallimin (dialectical theologians).” Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya praises him in several places—especially in Minhaj al-Sunna and in his collected epistles—ranking him among the most acute of the affirmers (ahl al-ithbat) and their chiefs, and holding that he joined Imam Ahmad and other salaf (early authorities) in refuting the doctrines of the Jahmiyya. When Abu al-Hasan al-Ashari, in Maqalat al-Islamiyyin (pp. 189, 299), speaks of “our companions,” he notes that they affirm even more than what we have reported from the Sunnites.
وَقَالَ بَعْضُ مَنْ لاَ يَعْلَمُ: إِنَّهُ ابتَدَعَ مَا ابتَدَعَه لِيَدُسَّ دِيْنَ النَّصَارَى فِي مِلَّتِنَا، وَإِنَّه أَرْضَى أُخْتَه بِذَلِكَ، وَهَذَا بَاطِلٌ، وَالرَّجُلُ أَقرَبُ المُتَكَلِّمِيْنَ إِلَى السُّنَّةِ، بَلْ هُوَ فِي مُنَاظِرِيهِم (١) . وَكَانَ يَقُوْلُ: بَأَنَّ القُرْآنَ قَائِمٌ بِالذَّاتِ بِلاَ قُدرَةٍ وَلاَ مَشِيْئَةٍ. وَهَذَا مَا سُبِقَ إِلَيْهِ أَبَداً، قَالَهُ فِي مُعَارَضَةِ مَنْ يَقُوْلُ بِخَلْقِ القُرْآنِ. وَصَنَّفَ فِي التَّوحِيدِ، وَإِثْبَاتِ الصِّفَاتِ، وَأَنَّ عُلُوَّ البَارِي عَلَى خَلقِه مَعْلُومٌ بِالفِطرَةِ وَالعَقلِ عَلَى وَفقِ النَّصِّ، وَكَذَلِكَ قَالَ المُحَاسِبِيُّ فِي كِتَابِ (فَهْمِ القُرْآنِ) . وَلَمْ أَقَعْ بِوَفَاةِ ابْنِ كُلاَّبٍ. وَقَدْ كَانَ بَاقِياً قَبْلَ الأَرْبَعِيْنَ وَمائَتَيْنِ. وَذَكَرَ لَهُ ابْنُ النَّجَّارِ تَرْجَمَةً فَلَمْ يُحَرِّرْهَا، وَذَكَرَ أَنَّهُ كَانَ فِي أَيَّامِ الجُنَيْدِ، وَسَمِعَ شَيْئاً مِنْ عِبَارَاتِ الصُّوْفِيَّةِ، وَتَعَجَّبَ مِنْهُ، وَهَابَه. قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بنُ إِسْحَاقَ النَّدِيْمُ: وَابْنُ كُلاَّبٍ مِنْ نَابِتَةِ الحَشْوِيَّةِ، لَهُ مَعَ عَبَّادِ بنِ سَلْمَانَ مُنَاظَرَاتٌ، فَيَقُوْلُ: كَلاَمُ اللهِ هُوَ اللهُ. فَيَقُوْلُ عَبَّادٌ: هُوَ نَصْرَانِيٌّ بِهَذَا القَوْلِ. وَقَالَ أَبُو العَبَّاسِ البَغَوِيُّ: قَالَ لِي فَيْثُوْنُ النَّصْرَانِيُّ: رَحِمَ اللهُ عَبْدَ اللهِ، كَانَ يَجِيْئُنِي إِلَى البِيْعَةِ، وَأَخَذَ عَنِّي، وَلَوْ عَاشَ، لَنَصَّرْنَا المُسْلِمِيْنَ. فَقِيْلَ لِفَيْثُوْنَ: مَا تَقُوْلُ فِي المَسِيْحِ؟ قَالَ: مَا يَقُوْلُه أَهْلُ سُنَّتِكُمْ فِي القُرْآنِ.
(١) كان إمام أهل السنة في عصره، وإليه مرجعها، وقد وصفه إمام الحرمين ت ٤٧٨ هـ في كتابه " الارشاد " ص: ١١٩: بأنه من أصحابنا. وقال السبكي في " طبقاته ": أحد أئمة المتكلمين. وشيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية يمدحه في غير ما موضع في كتابه " منهاج السنة "، وفي مجموعة رسائله ومسائله، ويعده من حذاق المثبتة وأئمتهم، ويرى أنه شارك الامام أحمد وغيره من أئمة السلف في الرد على مقالات الجهمية. وحين تكلم أبو الحسن الأشعري في كتابه " مقالات الإسلاميين "؟ / ١٨٩، ٢٩٩ عن أصحابه، ذكر أنهم يقولون بأكثر مما ذكرناه عن أهل السنة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies