Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

until he said to him, “In this isnād there is a transmitter whose narration is of no consequence and upon whom no reliance is placed—Qays ibn Abī Ḥāzim, a Bedouin who used to urinate on the backs of his feet.”

Ibn Abī Dāwūd thereupon kissed ʿAlī and embraced him.

The next morning, when the court re-assembled, Ibn Abī Dāwūd said, “Commander of the Faithful, he adduces the ḥadith of Jarīr as proof for the Vision, yet the only one who transmits it from Jarīr is Qays— that Bedouin who urinated on his heels!”

Aḥmad later remarked, “When he confronted me with this objection I realized it was the handiwork of ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī; this and the like were among the main factors that led to the flogging.”

Al-Marzubānī related the story, saying: “Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyā—meaning al-Ṣūlī—told me; al-Ḥusayn narrated it to us.”

Al-Khaṭīb then said: “As for what is attributed here to ʿAlī—that one is not to act upon what Qays narrates—this is baseless. Allah has preserved ʿAlī from uttering such a statement, for the scholars of transmission, ʿAlī among them, are unanimous in using the reports of Qays as evidence and in judging them sound, since he was one of the senior Successors of Kūfa.

“Among the Successors there is no one besides Qays who met the Ten Promised Paradise and transmitted from them, in addition to his reports from a multitude of other Companions …” until he said:

“If this report really goes back to Ibn Fahm, I suspect that it was Ibn Abī Dāwūd who disparaged Qays in the manner mentioned and then attributed it to Ibn al-Madīnī—and Allah knows best.”

I say: If the story is authentic, then perhaps ʿAlī merely repeated what he had heard from Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān, who said, “His ḥadith is munkar (deniable).”

He then enumerated several narrations he found objectionable, yet the criticism proved groundless, for they are in fact established. Given the breadth of what Qays transmitted, an occasional solitary report cannot be faulted. Among his transmissions is the ḥadith of the dogs of Ḥawʾab (1). Indeed, Qays all but counted as a Companion: he embraced Islam during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, then

(1) Related by Ahmad, 6/52 and 6/97; Ibn Hibban, no. 1831; and al-Hakim, 3/120, through several chains from Ismail ibn Abi Khalid, from Qays ibn Abi Hazim: when Aisha reached al-Hawab, she heard the dogs barking and said, “I think I must turn back, for the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, told us: ‘Which one of you will be barked at by the dogs of al-Hawab?’” The isnad is sound. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar adds in Fath al-Bari, 13/45, after…
حَتَّى قَالَ لَهُ: فِي هَذَا الإِسْنَادِ مَنْ لاَ يُعْمَلُ عَلَيْهِ، وَلاَ عَلَى مَا يَرْوِيْهِ، وَهُوَ قَيْسُ بنُ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، إِنَّمَا كَانَ أَعْرَابِيّاً بَوَّالاً عَلَى عَقِبَيْهِ. فَقَبَّلَ ابْنُ أَبِي دُوَادَ عَلِيّاً، وَاعتَنَقَهُ. فَلَمَّا كَانَ الغَدُ وَحَضَرُوا، قَالَ ابْنُ أَبِي دُوَادُ: يَا أَمِيْرَ المُؤْمِنِيْنَ، يَحْتَجُّ فِي الرُّؤْيَةِ بِحَدِيْثِ جَرِيْرٍ، وَإِنَّمَا رَوَاهُ عَنْهُ قَيْسٌ، وَهُوَ أَعْرَابِيٌّ بَوَّالٌ عَلَى عَقِبَيْهِ؟ قَالَ: فَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ: فَحِينَ أَطْلَعَ لِي هَذَا، عَلِمتُ أَنَّهُ مِنْ عَمَلِ عَلِيِّ بنِ المَدِيْنِيِّ، فَكَانَ هَذَا وَأَشْبَاهُهُ مِنْ أَوْكَدِ الأُمُورِ فِي ضَرْبِهِ. رَوَاهَا المَرْزُبَانِيُّ: أَخْبَرَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بنُ يَحْيَى -يَعْنِي: الصُّوْلِيَّ- حَدَّثَنَا الحُسَيْنُ. ثُمَّ قَالَ الخَطِيْبُ: أَمَّا مَا حُكِيَ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ فِي هَذَا الخَبَرِ مِنْ أَنَّهُ لاَ يَعْمَلُ عَلَى مَا يَرْوِيْهِ قَيْسٌ، فَهُوَ بَاطِلٌ. قَدْ نَزَّهَ اللهُ عَلِيّاً عَنْ قَوْلِ ذَلِكَ؛ لأَنَّ أَهْلَ الأَثَرِ، وَفِيْهُم عَلِيٌّ، مُجْمِعُوْنَ عَلَى الاحْتِجَاجِ بِرِوَايَةِ قَيْسٍ وَتَصْحِيْحِهَا، إِذْ كَانَ مِنْ كُبَرَاءِ تَابِعِيِّ أَهْلِ الكُوْفَةِ. وَلَيْسَ فِي التَّابِعِيْنِ مَنْ أَدْرَكَ العَشَرَةَ وَرَوَى عَنْهُمْ، غَيْرَ قَيْسٍ مَعَ رِوَايَتهِ عَنْ خَلْقٍ مِنَ الصَّحَابَةِ ... ، إِلَى أَنْ قَالَ: فَإِنْ كَانَ هَذَا مَحْفُوْظاً عَنِ ابْنِ فَهْمٍ، فَأَحْسِبُ أَنَّ ابْنَ أَبِي دُوَادَ تَكَلَّمَ فِي قَيْسٍ بِمَا ذَكَرَ فِي الحَدِيْثِ، وَعَزَا ذَلِكَ إِلَى ابْنِ المَدِيْنِيِّ - وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ -. قُلْتُ: إِنْ صَحَّتِ الحِكَايَةُ، فَلَعَلَّ عَلِيّاً قَالَ فِي قَيْسٍ مَا عِنْدَهُ عَنْ يَحْيَى القَطَّانِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: هُوَ مُنْكَرُ الحَدِيْثِ. ثُمَّ سَمَّى لَهُ أَحَادِيْثَ اسْتَنكَرَهَا، فَلَمْ يَصنَعْ شَيْئاً، بَلْ هِيَ ثَابِتَةٌ، فَلاَ يُنْكَرُ لَهُ التَفَرَّدُ فِي سَعَةِ مَا رَوَى، مِنْ ذَلِكَ حَدِيْثُ كِلاَبِ الحَوْأَبِ (١) ، وَقَدْ كَادَ قَيْسٌ أَنْ يَكُوْنَ صَحَابِيّاً. أَسْلَمَ فِي حَيَاةِ رَسُوْلِ اللهِ ﷺ ثُمَّ
(١) أخرجه أحمد ٦ / ٥٢ و٩٧، وابن حبان (١٨٣١) ، والحاكم ٣ / ١٢٠ من طرق عن إسماعيل بن أبي خالد، عن قيس بن أبي حازم أن عائشة لما أتت على الحوأب، سمعت نباح الكلاب، فقالت: ما أظنني إلا راجعة، إن رسول الله، ﷺ، قال لنا: " أيتكن تنبح عليها كلاب الحوأب؟ " وإسناده صحيح. وقال الحافظ في " الفتح " ١٣ / ٤٥ بعد أن =

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies