Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Ibn Ḥazm states: The bulk of the Rafidi dialecticians—Hisham ibn al-Ḥakam, his pupil Abū ʿAlī al-Sakkāk, and the rest—hold that Allah’s knowledge is a created accident, that He knew nothing from pre-eternity, and that He later brought knowledge into existence for Himself.

He further reports that, in his debate with Abū Hudhayl, Hisham ibn al-Ḥakam declared that his Lord is seven spans tall, measuring by His own span.

He adds: Among their senior theologians was Dāwūd al-Jawāribī, who alleged that his Lord is flesh and blood in the shape of a human being.

He continues: They are unanimous in affirming that the sun was returned for ʿAlī on two occasions.

Another doctrine common to all of them is that the Qur’an has been altered—parts were added and parts removed—except for al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā and his two associates.

Al-Nadīm remarks: He was one of Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq’s companions; he refined the doctrine, opened the discussion on the imamate, and was skilful and quick-witted in reply. He then listed the titles of his books, among them: Refutation of the Muʿtazilites, On Monotheism, and others.⦗1⦘

175 – Dirār ibn ʿAmr *

Likewise, among the leading Muʿtazilites was Dirār ibn ʿAmr, the head of the Dirāriyya.

Among his peculiar teachings he said: “It is conceivable that the entire community could, inwardly, be unbelievers, since such a possibility applies to every individual among them.”

He also maintained: “Bodies are nothing but a conglomeration of accidents, and that—”

(1) Al-Fihrist, pp. 223–224. This passage was originally placed under the entry for Hisham b. ʿAmr, which will appear shortly; we have transferred it here because Ibn al-Nadim quotes it only in the entry for this Hisham, not in that for Hisham b. ʿAmr. (*) Al-Duʿafaʾ by al-ʿUqayli, fol. 193; Ibn al-Nadim, Al-Fihrist, pp. 214–215; al-Dhahabi, Mizan al-Iʿtidal, 2:238–239; Ibn Hajar, Lisan al-Mizan, 3:203; Fadl al-Iʿtizal, p. 391; al-Baghdadi, Al-Farq bayna l-Firaq, p. 201.
قَالَ ابْنُ حَزْمٍ: جُمْهُوْرُ مُتَكَلِّمِي الرَّافِضَةِ كَهِشَامِ بنِ الحَكَمِ، وَتِلْمِيْذِهِ؛ أَبِي عَلِيٍّ الصَّكَّاكِ، وَغَيْرِهِمَا يَقُوْلُوْنَ: بِأَنَّ عِلْمَ اللهِ مُحْدَثٌ، وَأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَعْلَمْ شَيْئاً فِي الأَزَلِ، فَأَحْدَثَ لِنَفْسِهِ عِلْماً. قَالَ: وَقَالَ هِشَامُ بنُ الحَكَمِ فِي مُنَاظَرَتِهِ لأَبِي الهُذَيْلِ: إِنَّ رَبَّهُ طُوْلُهُ سَبْعَةُ أَشْبَارٍ بِشِبْرِ نَفْسِهِ. قَالَ: وَكَانَ دَاوُدُ الجَوَارِبِيُّ مِنْ كِبَارِ مُتَكَلِّمِيْهِم، يَزْعُمُ أَنَّ رَبَّهُ لَحْمٌ وَدَمٌ عَلَى صُوْرَةِ الآدَمِيِّ. قَالَ: وَلاَ يَخْتَلِفُوْنَ فِي رَدِّ الشَّمْسِ لِعَلِيٍّ مَرَّتَيْنِ. وَمِنْ قَوْلِ كُلِّهِمِ: إِنَّ القُرْآنَ مُبَدَّلٌ، زِيْدَ فِيْهِ، وَنُقِصَ مِنْهُ، إِلاَّ الشَّرِيْفَ المُرْتَضَى وَصَاحِبَيْهِ. قَالَ النَّدِيْمُ: هُوَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ جَعْفَرٍ الصَّادِقِ، هَذَّبَ المَذْهَبَ، وَفَتَقَ الكَلاَمَ فِي الإِمَامَةِ، وَكَانَ حَاذِقاً، حَاضِرَ الجَوَابِ. ثُمَّ سَرَدَ أَسْمَاءَ كُتُبِهِ، مِنْهَا: فِي الرَّدِّ عَلَى المُعْتَزِلَةِ، وَفِي التَّوْحِيْدِ، وَغَيْرِ ذَلِكَ (١) . ١٧٥- ضِرَارُ بنُ عَمْرٍو * نَعَمْ، وَمِنْ رُؤُوْسِ المُعْتَزِلَةِ ضِرَارُ بنُ عَمْرٍو، شَيْخُ الضِّرَارِيَةِ. فَمِنْ نِحْلَتِهِ، قَالَ: يُمْكِنُ أَنْ يَكُوْنَ جَمِيْعُ الأُمَّةِ فِي البَاطِنِ كُفَّاراً، لِجَوَازِ ذَلِكَ عَلَى كُلِّ فَرْدٍ مِنْهُم. وَيَقُوْلُ: الأَجْسَامُ إِنَّمَا هِيَ أَعْرَاضٌ مُجْتَمِعَةٌ، وَإِنَّ
(١) " الفهرست " ص ٢٢٣، ٢٢٤. وكان هذا النص في الأصل مثبتا في ترجمة هشام بن عمرو التي سترد قريبا، فنقلناه إلى هنا، لان النديم إنما ذكره في ترجمة هشام هذا، وليس في ترجمة هشام بن عمرو. (*) الضعفاء للعقيلي لوحة ١٩٣، الفهرست لابن النديم: ٢١٤، ٢١٥، ميزان الاعتدال ٢ / ٢٣٨، ٢٣٩، لسان الميزان ٣ / ٢٠٣، فضل الاعتزال: ٣٩١، الفرق بين الفرق: ٢٠١.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies