Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Muḥammad ibn Jaʿfar al-Qattāt said: “Abū Nuʿaym—the one whose eyes were slightly crossed—narrated to us in the year 218 AH.

Jaʿfar ibn ʿAbd al-Wāḥid al-Hāshimī transmitted from Abū Nuʿaym, who said: “In my possession from the Commander of the Believers in ḥadīth, Sufyān, are four thousand reports.” (1)

al-Faḍl ibn Ziyād said: I asked Aḥmad, “Does Ibn Fuḍayl, in your view, occupy the same rank (2) as ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Mūsā?” He replied, “No. Ibn Fuḍayl was more discreet, whereas ʿUbayd Allāh was prone to confusion and related objectionable ḥadīths.”

I said, “What about Abū Nuʿaym—does he share their standing?” He answered, “No. Abū Nuʿaym is wide-awake in ḥadīth, and he stood firm during the Affair—that is, the Inquisition (al-miḥna).”

He then added, “If you remove Abū Nuʿaym from the realm of ḥadīth, he amounts to nothing.” (3)

al-Marwadhī reported from Abū ʿAbd Allāh [Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal]: “Yahyā, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, and Abū Nuʿaym are authoritative, firmly grounded proofs.” (4)

al-Maymūnī also narrated that Aḥmad praised Abū Nuʿaym, saying: “He was trustworthy, alert in ḥadīth, thoroughly versed in it. Then, during the ordeal, he took a stand unmatched by anyone else—may Allah grant him well-being.”

Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmmār said: “Abū Nuʿaym was a meticulous ḥāfiẓ; when he relates from reliable transmitters, his ḥadīth is admissible—the most cogent proof there can be.” (5)

(1) Tahdhib al-Kamal, folio 1098. (2) The base manuscript reads “anka”; the emendation follows Tarikh Baghdad and Tahdhib al-Kamal. (3) Tarikh Baghdad 12/353; Tahdhib al-Kamal, folio 1098. (4) Tahdhib al-Kamal, folio 1098. (5) Tarikh Baghdad 12/354.
قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بنُ جَعْفَرٍ القَتَّاتُ: حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ الأَحْوَلُ مِنَ العَيْنَيْنِ سَنَةَ ثَمَانِ عَشْرَةَ. رَوَى: جَعْفَرُ بنُ عَبْدِ الوَاحِدِ الهَاشِمِيُّ، عَنْ أَبِي نُعَيْمٍ، قَالَ: عِنْدِي عَنْ أَمِيْرِ المُؤْمِنِيْنَ فِي الحَدِيْثِ سُفْيَانَ أَرْبَعَةُ آلاَفٍ (١) . الفَضْلُ بنُ زِيَادٍ: سَأَلْتُ أَحْمَدَ: أَيَجْرِي عِنْدَكَ (٢) ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ مَجْرَى عُبَيْدِ اللهِ بنِ مُوْسَى؟ قَالَ: لاَ، كَانَ ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ أَسْتَرُ، وَكَانَ عُبَيْدُ اللهِ صَاحِبُ تَخْلِيْطٍ، رَوَى أَحَادِيْثَ سُوْءٍ. قُلْتُ: فَأَبُو نُعَيْمٍ، يَجْرِي مَجْرَاهُمَا؟ قَالَ: لاَ، أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ يَقْظَانُ فِي الحَدِيْثِ، وَقَامَ فِي الأَمْرِ -يَعْنِي: المِحْنَةَ-. ثُمَّ قَالَ: إِذَا رَفَعْتَ أَبَا نُعَيْمٍ مِنَ الحَدِيْثِ، فَلَيْسَ بِشَيْءٍ (٣) . وَرَوَى المَرُّوْذِيُّ، عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللهِ، قَالَ: يَحْيَى، وَعَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ، وَأَبُو نُعَيْمٍ الحُجَّةُ، الثَّبْتُ (٤) . وَرَوَى المَيْمُوْنِيُّ عَنْ أَحْمَدَ أَنَّهُ أَثْنَى عَلَى أَبِي نُعَيْمٍ، وَقَالَ: كَانَ ثِقَةً، يَقْظَانَ فِي الحَدِيْثِ، عَارِفاً بِهِ، ثُمَّ قَامَ فِي أَمْرِ الامْتِحَانِ، مَا لَمْ يَقُمْ غَيْرُهُ، عَافَاهُ اللهُ. قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ بنِ عَمَّارٍ: أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ مُتْقِنٌ حَافِظٌ، إِذَا رَوَى عَنِ الثِّقَاتِ، فَحَدِيْثُهُ حُجَّةٌ أَحَجُّ مَا يَكُوْنُ (٥) .
(١) " تهذيب الكمال " لوحة ١٠٩٨. (٢) في الأصل: " عنك " والتصويب من " تاريخ بغداد " و" تهذيب الكمال ". (٣) " تاريخ بغداد " ١٢ / ٣٥٣، و" تهذيب الكمال " لوحة ١٠٩٨. (٤) " تهذيب الكمال " لوحة ١٠٩٨. (٥) " تاريخ بغداد " ١٢ / ٣٥٤.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies