Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Al-Fasawī (1) added: Ibn al-Madīnī was asked about the aforementioned narration and replied, “It is nothing; what is intended is the report of Yazīd ibn al-Asamm.”

Al-Rāmahurmuzī said: ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn Abān, the tailor from Rāmahurmuz, related to me; al-Qāsim ibn Naṣr al-Mukhar­ramī related to us; Sulaymān ibn Dāwūd al-Minqarī related to us, saying:

“The Caliph al-Maʾmūn sent al-Anṣārī fifty thousand dirhams to distribute among the jurists of Basra. Hilāl ibn Muslim would speak on behalf of his faction, while I”—al-Anṣārī—“spoke for mine. Hilāl said, ‘It belongs to us,’ and I responded, ‘No, it is for me and my companions.’

“We differed, so I said to Hilāl, ‘How do you recite the tashahhud (testification in the prayer)?’ He retorted, ‘Is someone like me to be asked about the tashahhud?’ He then recited it according to the ḥadith of Ibn Masʿūd. I asked, ‘Who transmitted that to you, and on what authority do you deem it established?’ Hilāl was left speechless and offered no reply. I said, ‘You pray every day and repeat these words, yet you do not know who conveyed them from your Prophet? May Allah distance you from true fiqh.’ Al-Anṣārī then distributed the money among his own companions (2).”

Clarification of this account: al-Minqarī is a weak transmitter.

Al-Anṣārī had studied jurisprudence under ʿUthmān al-Battī, Sawwār ibn ʿAbd Allāh, and ʿUbayd Allāh ibn al-Ḥasan al-ʿAnbarī. He served as judge of Basra in the time of Hārūn al-Rashīd, succeeding Muʿādh ibn Muʿādh. Later he came to Baghdad, held the judgeship there, and then returned.

According to Ibn Qutaybah (3), al-Rashīd appointed him judge over the eastern quarter after al-ʿAwfī. When al-Amīn succeeded to power he dismissed him and put him in charge of the maẓālim court after Ibn ʿUlayyah.

(1) al-Maʿrifa wa-l-Tarikh, vol. 3, pp. 7–8. (2) al-Muhaddith al-Fasil, pp. 210–211; and Tarikh Baghdad, vol. 5, p. 409. (3) al-Maʿarif, p. 530.
وَقَالَ الفَسَوِيُّ (١) : سُئِلَ ابْنُ المَدِيْنِيِّ عَنِ الحَدِيْثِ المَذْكُوْرِ، فَقَالَ: لَيْسَ مِنْ ذَا شَيْءٌ، إِنَّمَا أَرَادَ حَدِيْثَ يَزِيْدَ بنِ الأَصَمِّ. الرَّامَهُرْمُزِيُّ: حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ اللهِ بنُ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ أَبَانٍ الخَيَّاطُ مِنْ أَهْلِ رَامَهُرْمُزَ، حَدَّثَنَا القَاسِمُ بنُ نَصْرٍ المُخَرِّمِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا سُلَيْمَانُ بنُ دَاوُدَ المِنْقَرِيُّ، قَالَ: وَجَّهَ المَأْمُوْنُ إِلَى الأَنْصَارِيِّ خَمْسِيْنَ أَلْفَ دِرْهَمٍ يَقسِمُهَا بَيْنَ الفُقَهَاءِ بِالبَصْرَةِ، فَكَانَ هِلاَلُ بنُ مُسْلِمٍ يَتَكَلَّمُ عَنْ أَصْحَابِهِ. قَالَ الأَنْصَارِيُّ: وَكُنْتُ أَتَكَلَّمُ عَنْ أَصْحَابِي، فَقَالَ هِلاَلٌ: هِيَ لَنَا. وَقُلْتُ: بَلْ هِيَ لِي وَلأَصْحَابِي. فَاخْتَلَفْنَا، فَقُلْتُ لِهِلاَلٍ: كَيْفَ تَتَشَهَّدُ؟ فَقَالَ: أَوَ مِثْلِي يُسْأَلُ عَنِ التَّشَهُّدِ؟ فَتَشَهَّدَ عَلَى حَدِيْثِ ابْنِ مَسْعُوْدٍ، فَقَالَ: مَنْ حَدَّثَكَ بِهِ؟ وَمِنْ أَيْنَ ثَبَتَ عِنْدَكَ؟ فَبَقِيَ هِلاَلٌ، وَلَمْ يُجِبْهُ، فَقَالَ الأَنْصَارِيُّ: تُصَلِّي كُلَّ يَوْمٍ، وَتُرَدِّدُ هَذَا الكَلاَمَ، وَأَنْتَ لاَ تَدْرِي مَنْ رَوَاهُ عَنْ نَبِيِّكَ؟! بَاعَدَ اللهُ بَيْنَكَ وَبَيْنَ الفِقْهِ. فَقَسَمَهَا الأَنْصَارِيُّ فِي أَصْحَابِهِ (٢) . البَيَانُ فِي صِحَّةِ ذَلِكَ: فَإِنَّ المِنْقَرِيَّ وَاهٍ. وَكَانَ الأَنْصَارِيُّ قَدْ أَخَذَ الفِقْهَ عَنْ: عُثْمَانَ البَتِّيِّ، وَسَوَّارِ بنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ، وَعُبَيْدِ اللهِ بنِ الحَسَنِ العَنْبَرِيِّ، وَوَلِيَ قَضَاءَ البَصْرَةِ زَمَنَ الرَّشِيْدِ، بَعْدَ مُعَاذِ بنِ مُعَاذٍ، ثُمَّ قَدِمَ بَغْدَادَ، وَوَلِي بِهَا القَضَاءَ، ثُمَّ رَجَعَ. فَعَنِ ابْنِ قُتَيْبَةَ (٣) : أَنَّ الرَّشِيْدَ قَلَّدَهُ القَضَاءَ بِالجَانِبِ الشَّرقِيِّ بَعْدَ العَوْفِيِّ، فَلَمَّا وَلِيَ الأَمِيْنُ، عَزَلَهُ، وَاسْتَعْمَلَهُ عَلَى المَظَالِمِ، بَعْدَ ابْنِ عُلَيَّةَ.
(١) " المعرفة والتاريخ " ٣ / ٧ - ٨. (٢) " المحدث الفاصل " ٢١٠ - ٢١١، و" تاريخ بغداد " ٥ / ٤٠٩. (٣) " المعارف ": ٥٣٠.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies