Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

then pray four rakʿahs. In the first rakʿah recite al-Fātiḥah and Yā Sīn; in the second, al-Fātiḥah and ad-Dukhān; in the third, al-Fātiḥah and Alif Lām Mīm as-Sajdah; and in the fourth, Tabārak (al-Mulk). When you have finished, praise Allah, offer Him excellent laudation, invoke blessings upon me and upon the rest of the prophets, seek forgiveness for the believers, and say:

“O Allah, have mercy on me by enabling me to abandon sins; have mercy on me by freeing me from taking on what does not concern me; and provide me with the insight to look only into that which pleases You with regard to me. O Allah, Originator of the heavens and the earth, Possessor of majesty and honor, of an invincible might—I ask You, O Allah, O Most Merciful, by Your majesty and the light of Your Face, to bind my heart to the memorization of Your Book …”

—continuing in a lengthy supplication until he said—“O Abū al-Ḥasan, do that on three Fridays, or five, or seven, and you will be answered, by Allah’s permission.”

The narrator added: ʿAlī waited no more than five—or seven—Fridays before he returned to that same gathering and said, “O Messenger of Allah, in the past I could grasp no more than four verses or so, whereas today I learn forty verses at a time. I used to hear a hadith and, when I tried to repeat it, it slipped away; but today I hear a hadith and when I relate it I do not alter a single letter of it.”

At that the Prophet said to him, “A believer—by the Lord of the Kaʿbah—Abū al-Ḥasan! (1)”

Al-Tirmidhī commented: “It is ḥasan, gharīb; we know it only through the narration of al-Walīd.”

I say: In my view this report is fabricated—end of discussion. And perhaps (2) the flaw entered through Sulaymān ibn Bint Shuraḥbīl, for he is repudiated in ḥadith even though he was a memorizer. Had he said merely “from Ibn Jurayj,” it might have been accepted, but he expressly stated “he related it to us,” which strengthened the

(1) Reported by al-Tirmidhi (no. 3565) in the section on supplications, “The prayer for memorisation,” and by al-Hakim in his al-Mustadrak, 1/316; al-Hakim judged it “sound according to the criteria of the two Shaykhs.” al-Dhahabi responded: “This hadith is munkar (denounced) and shadh (anomalous); by Allah, the soundness of its chain puzzles me.” In al-Mizan, 2/213, under the biography of Sulayman ibn Abd al-Rahman—the transmitter from al-Walid ibn Muslim—he adds: “Although its isnad is outwardly clean, it is in my view strongly munkar; something about it troubles me.” Conversely, al-Mundhiri states in al-Targhib wa-l-Tarhib that “the various isnads of this hadith are good, but its matn (text) is extremely unusual.” (2) The base manuscript reads: wa la‛allahu (“and perhaps”).
فَصَلِّ أَرْبَعَ رَكَعَاتٍ، تَقْرَأُ فِي الأُوْلَى: بِالفَاتِحَةِ وَيس، وَفِي الثَّانِيَةِ: بِالفَاتِحَةِ وَالدُّخَانِ، وَفِي الثَّالِثَةِ: بِآلم السَّجْدَةِ، وَفِي الرَّابِعَةِ: تَبَارَكَ، فَإِذَا فَرَغْتَ، فَاحْمَدِ اللهَ، وَأَحْسِنِ الثَّنَاءَ، وَصَلِّ عَلَيَّ، وَعَلَى سَائِرِ النَّبِيِّيْنَ، وَاسْتَغْفرْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِيْنَ، وَقُلْ: اللَّهُمَّ ارْحَمْنِي بِتَرْكِ المَعَاصِي، وَارْحَمْنِي أَنْ أَتَكَلَّفَ مَا لاَ يَعْنِيْنِي، وَارْزُقْنِي حُسْنَ النَّظَرِ فِيْمَا يُرْضِيْكَ عَنِّي، اللَّهُمَّ بَدِيْعَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ، ذَا الجَلاَلِ وَالإِكْرَامِ، وَالعِزَّةِ الَّتِي لاَ تُرَامُ، أَسْأَلُكَ يَا اللهُ، يَا رَحْمَنُ، بِجَلاَلِكَ وَنُوْرِ وَجْهِكَ، أَنْ تُلْزِمَ قَلْبِي حِفْظَ كِتَابِكَ ... ) فِي دُعَاءٍ فِيْهِ طَوِيْلٍ، إِلَى أَنْ قَالَ: (يَا أَبَا الحَسَنِ، تَفْعَلُ ذَلِكَ ثَلاَثَ جُمَعٍ، أَوْ خَمْساً، أَوْ سَبْعاً، تُجَابُ بِإِذْنِ اللهِ) . قَالَ: فَمَا لَبِثَ عَلِيٌّ إِلاَّ خَمْساً، أَوْ سَبْعاً، حَتَّى جَاءَ فِي مِثْلِ ذَلِكَ المَجْلِسِ، فَقَالَ: يَا رَسُوْلَ اللهِ، مَا لِي كُنْتُ فِيْمَا خَلاَ لاَ آخُذُ إِلاَّ أَرْبَعَ آيَاتٍ وَنَحْوَهُنَّ، وَأَنَا أَتَعَلَّمُ اليَوْمَ أَرْبَعِيْنَ آيَةً، وَلَقَدْ كُنْتُ أَسْمَعُ الأَحَادِيْثَ، فَإِذَا رَدَّدْتُهُ، تَفَلَّتَ، وَأَنَا اليَوْمَ أَسْمَعُ الأَحَادِيْثَ، فَإِذَا حَدَّثْتُ، لَمْ أُحَرِّفْ مِنْهَا حَرفاً؟ فَقَالَ لَهُ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ: (مُؤْمِنٌ - وَرَبِّ الكَعْبَةِ - أَبَا الحَسَنِ (١)) . قَالَ التِّرْمِذِيُّ: حَسَنٌ، غَرِيْبٌ، لاَ نَعْرِفُهُ إِلاَّ مِنْ حَدِيْثِ الوَلِيْدِ. قُلْتُ: هَذَا عِنْدِي مَوْضُوْعٌ وَالسَّلاَمُ، وَلَعَلَّ (٢) الآفَةَ دَخَلَتْ عَلَى سُلَيْمَانَ ابْنِ بِنْتِ شُرَحْبِيْلَ فِيْهِ، فَإِنَّهُ مُنْكَرُ الحَدِيْثِ، وَإِنْ كَانَ حَافِظاً، فَلَو كَانَ، قَالَ فِيْهِ: عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، لَرَاجَ، وَلَكِنْ صَرَّحَ بِالتَّحْدِيْثِ، فَقَوِيَتِ
(١) أخرجه الترمذي (٣٥٦٥) في الدعوات: باب في دعاء الحفظ، والحاكم في " مستدركه " ١ / ٣١٦، وقال: صحيح على شرط الشيخين، وتعقبه الذهبي بقوله: هذا حديث منكر شاذ وقد حيرني والله جودة إسناده. وقال في " الميزان " ٢ / ٢١٣ في ترجمة سليمان بن عبد الرحمن راويه عن الوليد بن مسلم: وهو مع نظافة سنده منكر جدا في نفسي منه شيء وقال المنذري في " الترغيب والترهيب ": طرق أسانيد هذا الحديث جيدة، ومتنه غريب جدا. (٢) في الأصل: ولعله.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies