Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

the session of Shuʿbah. He said, “Abu Muʿāwiyah, did you hear such-and-such a report from al-Aʿmash?”
He replied, “Yes.”
Shuʿbah then announced, “This man is the close companion of al-Aʿmash—recognise him.”

Abu Zurʿah al-Dimashqī said, “I heard Abū Nuʿaym state: ‘Abu Muʿāwiyah remained with al-Aʿmash for twenty years.’”

Aḥmad ibn ʿUmar al-Wakīʿī said, “Among all the people we met, no one knew al-Aʿmash’s ḥadiths better than Abu Muʿāwiyah.”

Aḥmad ibn Dāwud al-Ḥarrānī said, “I heard Abu Muʿāwiyah say: ‘Even the sighted scholars depended on me when it came to al-Aʿmash’s narrations.’”

Ibn ʿAmmār related that he heard Abu Muʿāwiyah say:
“Every ḥadith for which I preface my report with ‘ḥaddathanā’ (he narrated to us) is something I memorised verbatim from the speaker’s own mouth. Whenever I say ‘so-and-so mentioned,’ that is a report I did not take directly from him; rather, it was read to him from a book, and I memorised and recognised it.”

Al-ʿIjlī said, “He is a Kufan, reliable, but he espoused irjāʾ (1); the censure levelled against him is mild.”

Yaʿqūb ibn Shaybah said, “Trustworthy, though he occasionally practised tadlīs; he held to irjāʾ, and it is said that Wakīʿ did not attend his funeral on that account.”

Abu Dāwud said, “He was the head of the Murjiʾah in Kūfah.”

Al-Nasāʾī said, “Reliable.”

Ibn Khirāsh said, “Truthful; as regards reports from al-Aʿmash he is reliable, but in other narrations he shows some inconsistency.”

(1) As stated on several previous occasions, the expert hadith critics (jahabidhah) do not consider this opinion a defect in the scholar who adopts it.
مَجْلِسِ شُعْبَةَ، فَقَالَ: يَا أَبَا مُعَاوِيَةَ! سَمِعْتَ حَدِيْثَ كَذَا مِنَ الأَعْمَشِ؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ. فَقَالَ شُعْبَةُ: هَذَا صَاحِبُ الأَعْمَش، فَاعْرِفُوهُ. وَقَالَ أَبُو زُرْعَةَ الدِّمَشْقِيُّ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا نُعِيْمٍ يَقُوْلُ: لَزِمَ أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ الأَعْمَشَ عِشْرِيْنَ سَنَةً. وَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ بنُ عُمَرَ الوَكِيْعِيُّ: مَا أَدْرَكْنَا أَحَداً كَانَ أَعْلَمَ بِأَحَادِيْثِ الأَعْمَشِ مِنْ أَبِي مُعَاوِيَةَ. قَالَ أَحْمَدُ بنُ دَاوُدَ الحَرَّانِيُّ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا مُعَاوِيَةَ يَقُوْلُ: البُصَرَاءُ، كَانُوا عِيَالاً عَلَيَّ عِنْدِ الأَعْمَشِ. وَقَالَ ابْنُ عَمَّارٍ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا مُعَاوِيَةَ يَقُوْلُ: كُلُّ حَدِيْثٍ أَقُوْلُ فِيْهِ: حَدَّثَنَا، فَهُوَ مَا حَفِظتُهُ مِنْ فِيِّ المُحَدِّثِ، وَمَا قُلْتُ: ذَكَرَ فُلاَنٌ، فَهُوَ مَا لَمْ أَحْفَظْه مِنْ فِيْهِ، وَقُرِئَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابٍ، فَحَفِظتُهُ وَعَرَفتُهُ. قَالَ العِجْلِيُّ: كُوْفِيٌّ، ثِقَةٌ، يَرَى الإِرْجَاءَ (١) ، وَكَانَ لَيِّنَ القَوْلِ فِيْهِ. وَقَالَ يَعْقُوْبُ بنُ شَيْبَةَ: ثِقَةٌ، رُبَّمَا دَلَّسَ، كَانَ يَرَى الإِرْجَاءَ، فَيُقَالُ: إِنَّ وَكِيْعاً لَمْ يَحضُرْ جِنَازَتَه لِذَلِكَ. وَقَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ: كَانَ رَئِيْسَ المُرْجِئَةَ بِالكُوْفَةِ. وَقَالَ النَّسَائِيُّ: ثِقَةٌ. وَقَالَ ابْنُ خِرَاشٍ: صَدُوْقٌ، وَهُوَ فِي الأَعْمَش ثِقَةٌ، وَفِي غَيْرِهِ فِيْهِ اضْطِرَابٌ.
(١) قد تقدم غير مرة أن هذا لا يعد قدحا في حق القائل به عند الجهابذة النقاد من المحدثين.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies