Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

And people today, the world over, have settled upon five schools, the fifth being the Dawudi (Zahiri) school.

It is therefore a duty for the earnest student of knowledge to ascertain which of these is most deserving of imitation, so that he may adopt it as his own.

Here we shall demonstrate that Mālik—may Allah have mercy on him—is that scholar, for he united within himself all the requisites of leadership and was the most knowledgeable of his contemporaries.

The Qadi then set forth this claim, refined it, and adorned it; yet no follower of Abū Ḥanīfa, al-Shāfiʿī, Aḥmad, or Dāwūd would be unable to make the very same claim for his own imam. Indeed, that is what he holds in his heart even if he never utters it aloud.

Qadi ʿIyāḍ went on to say: “In our estimation—and praise be to Allah—every one of the imams just mentioned possesses merits that establish his right to the rank of leadership.”(1)

I reply: Yet this imam, who is the guiding star, dealt justly and spoke a decisive word when he said:

“Everyone’s statement may be taken or left, except that of the inhabitant of this grave”—may Allah bless him and grant him peace.

There is no doubt that anyone who senses within himself real jurisprudential skill, breadth of learning, and sincerity of purpose cannot confine himself to a single school in all that he says, for the soundness of another school’s position has become evident to him

(1) Consult the chapter written by Qadi Iyad in Tartib al-Madarik, vol. 1, pp. 89 and 102, where he seeks to establish the superiority of Imam Malik’s school over the others. A close reading will show that Imam al-Dhahabi’s objections are well-founded: the entire chapter breathes a blameworthy partisanship that leads to exaggeration, excessive eulogy, attributing perfection and infallibility to one who does not possess them, and assigning statements to other imams that they never made—an approach that necessarily disparages those imams, even the most illustrious among them. Imam Malik—despite his acknowledged virtue, learning, ijtihad and piety—remains, like every mujtahid imam, susceptible to error: when he is correct he receives a double reward, and when mistaken a single reward. More than one scholar, such as al-Shafii and Ahmad, criticised him on numerous points and demonstrated that the correct view lay elsewhere; these critiques are recorded in the standard works of juridical dispute. Hilyat al-Awliya, vol. 6, p. 323, transmits from Said b. Sulayman: “I scarcely heard Malik issue a fatwa without reciting the verse, ‘We only conjecture; we are by no means certain.’” I am convinced that had Imam Malik seen what Qadi Iyad wrote, he would have disavowed it and censured him for his treatment of the other imams.
وَصَارَ النَّاسُ اليَوْمَ فِي الدُّنْيَا إِلَى خَمْسَةِ مَذَاهِبَ، فَالخَامِسُ: هُوَ مَذْهَبُ الدَّاوُوْدِيَّةِ. فَحَقٌّ عَلَى طَالِبِ العِلْمِ أَنْ يَعْرِفَ أَوْلاَهُم بِالتَّقْلِيْدِ، لِيَحصَلَ عَلَى مَذْهَبِهِ. وَهَا نَحْنُ نُبَيِّنُ أَنَّ مَالِكاً ﵀ هُوَ ذَلِكَ؛ لِجَمعِهِ أَدَوَاتِ الإِمَامَةِ، وَكَونِهِ أَعْلَمَ القَوْمِ. ثُمَّ وَجَّهَ القَاضِي دَعوَاهُ، وَحَسَّنَهَا، وَنَمَّقَهَا، وَلَكِنْ مَا يَعْجِزُ كُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ حَنَفِيٍّ، وَشَافِعِيٍّ، وَحَنْبَلِيٍّ، وَدَاوُوْدِيٍّ عَنِ ادِّعَاءِ مِثْلِ ذَلِكَ لِمَتْبُوعِه، بَلْ ذَلِكَ لِسَانُ حَالِه، وَإِنْ لَمْ يَفُهْ بِهِ. ثُمَّ قَالَ القَاضِي عِيَاضٌ: وَعِنْدنَا - وَللهِ الحَمْدُ - لِكُلِّ إِمَامٍ مِنَ المَذْكُوْرِيْنَ مَنَاقِبُ، تَقْضِي لَهُ بِالإِمَامَةِ (١) . قُلْتُ: وَلَكِنَّ هَذَا الإِمَامَ الَّذِي هُوَ النَّجمُ الهَادِي قَدْ أَنْصَفَ، وَقَالَ قَوْلاً فَصْلاً، حَيْثُ يَقُوْلُ: كُلُّ أَحَدٍ يُؤْخَذُ مِنْ قَوْلِه، وَيُتْرَكُ، إِلاَّ صَاحِبَ هَذَا القَبْرِ ﷺ. وَلاَ رَيْبَ أَنَّ كُلَّ مِنْ أَنِسَ مِنْ نَفْسِهِ فِقهاً، وَسَعَةَ عِلْمٍ، وَحُسْنَ قَصدٍ، فَلاَ يَسَعُهُ الالْتِزَامُ بِمَذْهَبٍ وَاحِدٍ فِي كُلِّ أَقْوَالِه، لأَنَّهُ قَدْ تَبَرَهَنَ لَهُ مَذْهَبُ الغَيْرِ
(١) راجع الفصل الذي كتبه القاضي عياض في " ترتيب المدارك " ١ / ٨٩، ١٠٢ في ترجيح مذهب الامام على غيره من الأئمة، فإنك ستعلم أن الامام الذهبي كان محقا في تعقبه ونقده في مواطن من كلامه، فقد كتب هذا الفصل يدافع التعصب المقيت الحامل على الغلو والاطراء في المدح، وإضفاء صفة الكمال والعصمة لغير من هي له، ونسبة أقوال إلى غيره من الأئمة لا تصح عنهم، يلزم عنها الطعن فيهم والنبيل منهم، فالامام مالك ﵀ مع كونه صاحب فضل وعلم، واجتهاد وورع، هو كغيره من الأئمة المجتهدين، يصيب ويخطئ، فإن أصاب فله أجران، وإن أخطأ، فله أجر واحد، وقد انتقده غير واحد من الأئمة كالشافعي وأحمد وغيرهما في أكثر من مسألة وبينوا أن الصواب في غير ما ذهب إليه، وذلك مدون في مظانه من كتب الخلاف، وجاء في " حلية الأولياء " ٦ / ٣٢٣ عن سعيد بن سليمان قال: قلما سمعت مالكا يفتي بشيء إلا تلا هذه الآية: (إن نظن إلا ظنا وما نحن بمستيقنين) ولست أشك في أن الامام مالكا لو رأى الذي كتبه القاضي عياض لتبرأ منه، وأنحى بالائمة عليه.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies