Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

He narrated from al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī, Abū ʿImrān al-Jawni, ʿAmr ibn Dīnār, Qatādah, Yaḥyā ibn Abī Kathīr, and Budayl ibn Maysarah.

Those who transmitted from him include Abū Dāwūd, Muslim ibn Ibrāhīm, Ḥabbān ibn Hilāl, Sahl ibn Bakkār, ʿAffān ibn Muslim, Mūsā ibn Ismāʿīl al-Tabūdhakī, Shaybān ibn Farrūkh, Hudbah ibn Khālid, and many others.

Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal said, “He was firm with respect to all his teachers.”

Yaḥyā ibn Maʿīn, Aḥmad al-ʿIjli, and al-Nasāʾī likewise declared, “He was trustworthy.” Al-ʿIjli added, “He inclined to qadar (the free-will doctrine).”

Aḥmad ibn Zuhayr reported that Yaḥyā ibn Maʿīn was asked about Abān and Hammām. He replied, “Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān used to narrate from Abān and preferred him to Hammām, whereas I myself prefer Hammām.”

As for Muḥammad ibn Yūnus al-Kudaymī, he related—on the authority of ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī, from Yaḥyā ibn Saʿīd—that the latter had rated Abān as weak and said, “I will not transmit ⦗1⦘ from him.”

If this report is sound, then at first he did refrain from narrating from him, but later on he did so after his judgment changed.

Indeed, ʿAbbās al-Dūrī transmitted from Yaḥyā ibn Maʿīn that he said, “Yaḥyā ibn Saʿīd died while he was still narrating from Abān ibn Yazīd.”

Abū Ḥātim said, “His ḥadīth is sound.”

Abū Aḥmad ibn ʿAdī mentioned him, saying, “He is steady; his narrations are to be recorded.”

I say: the man is reliable, a definitive authority. Both authors of the Ṣaḥīḥ relied upon him, and I have not come across

(1) In Ibn Hajar’s Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, 1/102, it is stated: “I do not relate from him.” Ibn Hajar then remarks: “He did not quote anyone who declared the narrator reliable—one of the defects of his book is that he records criticisms but omits endorsements—and al-Daymi cannot be relied upon.”
رَوَى عَنِ: الحَسَنِ البَصْرِيِّ، وَأَبِي عِمْرَانَ الجَوْنِيِّ، وَعَمْرِو بنِ دِيْنَارٍ، وَقَتَادَةَ، وَيَحْيَى بنِ أَبِي كَثِيْرٍ، وَبُدَيْلِ بنِ مَيْسَرَةَ. حَدَّثَ عَنْهُ: أَبُو دَاوُدَ، وَمُسْلِمُ بنُ إِبْرَاهِيْمَ، وَحَبَّانُ بنُ هِلاَلٍ، وَسَهْلُ بنُ بَكَّارٍ، وَعَفَّانُ بنُ مُسْلِمٍ، وَمُوْسَى بنُ إِسْمَاعِيْلَ التَّبُوْذَكِيُّ، وَشَيْبَانُ بنُ فَرُّوْخٍ، وَهُدْبَةُ بنُ خَالِدٍ، وَخَلْقٌ كَثِيْرٌ. قَالَ أَحْمَدُ بنُ حَنْبَلٍ: كَانَ ثَبْتاً فِي كُلِّ مَشَايِخِه. وَقَالَ يَحْيَى بنُ مَعِيْنٍ، وَأَحْمَدُ العِجْلِيُّ، وَالنَّسَائِيُّ: كَانَ ثِقَةً. زَادَ العِجْلِيُّ: يَرَى القَدَرَ. وَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ بنُ زُهَيْرٍ: سُئِلَ يَحْيَى بنُ مَعِيْنٍ عَنْ أَبَانٍ وَهَمَّامٍ، فَقَالَ: كَانَ يَحْيَى القَطَّانُ يَرْوِي عَنْ أَبَانٍ، وَكَانَ أَحَبَّ إِلَيْهِ مِنْ هَمَّامٍ، وَأَنَا فَهَمَّامٌ أَحَبُّ إِلَيَّ. وَأَمَّا مُحَمَّدُ بنُ يُوْنُسَ الكُدَيْمِيُّ، فَرَوَى عَنْ: عَلِيِّ بنِ المَدِيْنِيِّ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بنِ سَعِيْدٍ: أَنَّهُ لَيَّنَ أَبَاناً، وَقَالَ: لاَ أُحَدِّثُ (١) عَنْهُ. فَإِنْ صَحَّ هَذَا، فَقَدْ كَانَ لاَ يَرْوِي عَنْهُ، ثُمَّ رَوَى عَنْهُ، وَتَغَيَّرَ اجْتِهَادُهُ. فَقَدْ رَوَى: عَبَّاسٌ الدُّوْرِيُّ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بنِ مَعِيْنٍ، قَالَ: مَاتَ يَحْيَى بنُ سَعِيْدٍ، وَهُوَ يَرْوِي عَنْ أَبَانِ بنِ يَزِيْدَ. وَقَالَ أَبُو حَاتِمٍ: صَالِحُ الحَدِيْثِ. وَذَكَرَهُ: أَبُو أَحْمَدَ بنُ عَدِيٍّ، فَقَالَ: هُوَ مُتَمَاسِكٌ، يُكْتَبُ حَدِيْثُهُ. قُلْتُ: الرَّجُلُ ثِقَةٌ، حُجَّةٌ، قَدِ احْتَجَّ بِهِ صَاحِبَا (الصَّحِيْحِ) ، وَلَمْ أَقَعْ
(١) في " تهذيب التهذيب ": ١ / ١٠٢: " أنا لا أروي عنه ". ثم قال ابن حجر: " ولم يذكر من وثقه، وهذا من عيوب كتابه، يذكر من طعن الراوي، ولا يذكر من وثقه، والديمي ليس بمعتمد ".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies