They persisted until he finally accepted, whereupon they handed him one thousand dinars—meaning state funds. On his return journey he died in Kūfa, may God have mercy on him.
All of this was reported by Ibn Saʿd in al-Ṭabaqāt from al-Wāqidī. Although there is no dispute that al-Wāqidī is weak as a transmitter, he was nevertheless truthful in speech and of high standing.
In the Musnad of al-Shāfiʿī, in our own audition, we read: “Abū Ḥanīfa ibn Simāk informed us, ‘Ibn Abī Dhiʾb related to me, from al-Maqburī, from Abū Shurayḥ, that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “Whoever has had a relative killed is granted two good choices: if he wishes, he may take the blood-money, and if he wishes, he may claim retribution.” (1)’ ”
I asked Ibn Abī Dhiʾb, “Do you act on this ḥadīth?”
He struck his chest, shouted repeatedly, rebuked me, and said, “I relate to you from the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) and you ask, ‘Do you act on it?’ Yes, I act on it! That is obligatory upon me and upon everyone who hears it. Allah chose Muḥammad (peace and blessings be upon him) from among mankind and guided them through him and at his hands; therefore all people must follow him, willingly or reluctantly—no Muslim has any way out of that.”
Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal said: “News reached Ibn Abī Dhiʾb that Mālik did not act upon the ḥadīth, ‘The two parties to a sale retain the right of option.’ (2) He said, ‘He must be asked to repent; if he repents, so be it, otherwise his neck is to be struck.’ ”
Then Aḥmad added: “He was more scrupulous and more forthright in speaking the truth than Mālik.”
I say: Had his scrupulousness been as it ought to be, he would not have uttered such harsh words about an Imām