Ali said, “I heard Yahya remark, ‘Al-Hajjaj ibn Artaʾah (1) and Muhammad ibn Ishaq are on the same level, while Ashʿath ibn Sawwar comes beneath the two of them.’ He also said, ‘I left off narrating from Ibn Ishaq deliberately.’
Ibrahim al-Hizami relates—on the authority of Ibn Abi Fudayk—that he said, ‘I saw Muhammad ibn Ishaq writing from a man who belonged to the People of the Book.’
I say: This point is often used to disparage Ibn Ishaq, yet there is no doubt that he gathered a variety of reports from non-Muslim subjects, relying on the Prophet’s—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—statement, “Convey from the Children of Israel, and there is no harm in doing so” (2).
Abu Jaʿfar al-ʿUqayli reported: Aslam ibn Sahl narrated to me; Muhammad ibn ʿAmr ibn ʿAwn narrated to us; Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Saʿid al-Qattan narrated, saying, ‘My father said: I heard Malik say, “People of Iraq! Who will be able to dupe you after Muhammad ibn Ishaq?”’ (3)
(1) His biographical notice will appear on p. 68.
(2) Al-Bukhari, Sahih, vol. 6, p. 361, Book of the Prophets, chapter “What has been reported about the Children of Israel,” from the hadith of Abdullah b. Amr: the Prophet ﷺ said: “Convey from me even one verse; relate reports about the Children of Israel without blame; and whoever deliberately attributes a lie to me, let him take his seat in Hellfire.”
As for the material that has reached us from them, its transmission is qualified: what accords with our law we affirm and may transmit; what contradicts it we reject and are forbidden to report except to expose its falsity; and with regard to what our law is silent about, we suspend judgement—neither confirming nor denying—though narration remains permissible.
Most of what is transmitted concerns stories and historical reports, not doctrine or legal rulings.
Yet one must realise that the licence to recount such material, when we lack proof of its truth or falsehood, does not justify inserting it into Quranic exegesis, presenting it as an interpretation, as a specification of what the verses left unspecified, or as a detail of what the revelation stated in general terms. To place such uncertain material alongside God’s words might suggest that it clarifies or elaborates His speech—far be that from the Book of Allah.
Indeed, when the Messenger of Allah ﷺ permitted us to relate from them, he also instructed us neither to confirm nor to deny them. What stronger endorsement of their reports could there be than coupling them with the Book of Allah and treating them as its commentary?
(3) “yaghtu ‘alaykum” means “it becomes corrupt for you,” from ghata al-kalam ghatan, “the speech became unsound.” Qays b. al-Khatim said: “Speech does not become unsound when she speaks, while in her mouth there is a delightfully stirring sweetness.”