Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Ibn Abī al-Wazīr transmits from Mālik that, when Ibn ʿAjlān was mentioned in his presence, he spoke of him in favorable terms.

Abū Muḥammad al-Rāmahurmuzī relates: ʿAbd Allāh narrated to us; al-Qāsim ibn Naṣr narrated to us; I heard Khalaf ibn Sālim say that Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān narrated to me:

“I arrived in Kūfa while Ibn ʿAjlān was there, and among the scholars being sought out were Ḥafṣ ibn Ghiyāth, Maliyḥ ibn Wakīʿ (1), and Ibn Idrīs.

“I said, ‘Let us visit Ibn ʿAjlān.’

“Yūsuf al-Samti remarked, ‘Let us turn his ḥadith upside down—swap the chains—so that we can test his understanding.’

“So they did. Whatever was actually from his father they presented as being from Abū Hurayrah himself, and whatever was from al-Maqburī on the authority of Abū Hurayrah they presented as being from his father on the authority of Abū Hurayrah.

“They entered and questioned him, and he narrated accordingly. When they reached the end of the notebook he realized what had happened and said, ‘Repeat it.’

“They repeated it for him, and he said, ‘Everything you asked me on the authority of his father was narrated to me by Saʿīd, and everything you asked me on the authority of Saʿīd was narrated to me by my father.’

“Then he turned to Yūsuf ibn Khālid and said, ‘If you intended to disgrace and fault me, may Allah strip you of Islam.’ He turned to Ḥafṣ and said, ‘May Allah afflict you in your religion and in your worldly life.’ Then he turned to the third man and said, ‘May Allah cause your knowledge to be of no benefit to you.’”

Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān continued: “Maliyḥ ibn Wakīʿ died and his knowledge brought him no benefit; Ḥafṣ was stricken with paralysis and burdened with the judgeship; and Yūsuf did not die before being accused of zandaqa (2).”

This story, however, is open to criticism. I do not know who this ʿAbd Allāh is, and Maliyḥ is an unknown figure. Moreover, Wakīʿ ibn al-Jarāḥ had no son pursuing knowledge in the days of Ibn ʿAjlān, and the practice of flipping isnāds (chains of transmission) on the shaykhs did not appear until after the year 200 AH.

A report is also narrated from Ibn ʿAjlān, from

(1) These words are missing from the base manuscript, yet they are indispensable; the complete report confirms this. (2) This episode is recorded by al-Ramhurmuzi in al-Muhaddith al-Fasil, p. 398, where the name Abd Allah has been mistakenly written as Ubayd Allah. The editor was also mistaken in Ibn Ujlan’s biographical entry when he wrote that Muslim and the four Sunan compilers transmitted his reports, for Muslim only cites him in conjunction with another narrator—an essential qualification that must be mentioned. Ibn Ujlan’s narrations are generally judged hasan (sound). See Siyar, 6/21.
ابْنِ أَبِي الوَزِيْرِ، عَنْ مَالِكٍ: أَنَّهُ ذَكَرَ ابْنَ عَجْلاَنَ، فَذَكَرَ خَيْراً. قَالَ أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ الرَّامَهُرْمُزِيُّ: حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللهِ، حَدَّثَنَا القَاسِمُ بنُ نَصْرٍ، سَمِعْتُ خَلَفَ بنَ سَالِمٍ، حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى القَطَّانُ، قَالَ: قَدِمْتُ الكُوْفَةَ وَبِهَا ابْنُ عَجْلاَنَ، وَبِهَا مِمَّنْ يُطلَبُ: حَفْصُ بنُ غِيَاثٍ، وَمَلِيْحُ بنُ وَكِيْعٍ (١) ، وَابْنُ إِدْرِيْسَ. فَقُلْتُ: نَأتِي ابْنَ عَجْلاَنَ. فَقَالَ يُوْسُفُ السَّمْتِيُّ: نَقْلِبُ عَلَيْهِ حَدِيْثَه، حَتَّى نَنظُرَ فَهمَهُ. قَالَ: فَفَعَلُوا، فَمَا كَانَ عَنْ أَبِيْهِ، جَعَلُوْهُ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ نَفْسِه، وَمَا كَانَ لِلْمَقْبُرِيِّ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، جَعَلُوْهُ عَنْ أَبِيْهِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ. فَدَخَلُوا، فَسَأَلُوْهُ، فَمرَّ فِيْهَا، فَلَمَّا كَانَ عِنْدَ آخرِ الكِتَابِ، تَنَبَّهَ، فَقَالَ: أَعدْ. فَعرضَ عَلَيْهِ، فَقَالَ: مَا سَأَلتُمُوْنِي عَنْ أَبِيْهِ، فَقَدْ حَدَّثَنِي سَعِيْدٌ، وَمَا سَأَلتُمُوْنِي عَنْ سَعِيْدٍ، فَقَدْ حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي بِهِ. ثُمَّ أَقْبَلَ عَلَى يُوْسُفَ بنِ خَالِدٍ، فَقَالَ: إِنْ كُنْتَ أَرَدْتَ شَيْنِي وَعَيْبِي، فَسَلَبَكَ اللهُ الإِسْلاَمَ. وَأَقْبَلَ عَلَى حَفْصٍ، فَقَالَ: ابْتَلاَكَ اللهُ فِي دِيْنِكَ وَدُنْيَاكَ. وَأَقْبَلَ عَلَى الآخرِ، فَقَالَ: لاَ نَفعَكَ اللهُ بِعِلْمِكَ. قَالَ يَحْيَى القَطَّانُ: فَمَاتَ مَلِيْحُ بنُ وَكِيْعٍ وَمَا انْتُفِعَ بِعِلْمِه، وَابْتُلِيَ حَفْصٌ بِالفَالِجِ وَبِالقَضَاءِ، وَلَمْ يَمُتْ يُوْسُفُ حَتَّى اتُّهِمَ بِالزَّنْدَقَةِ (٢) . فَهَذِهِ الحِكَايَة فِيْهَا نَظَرٌ، وَمَا أَعْرِفُ عَبْدَ اللهِ هَذَا، وَمَلِيْحٌ لاَ يُدرَى مَنْ هُوَ، وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لِوَكِيْعِ بنِ الجَرَّاحِ وَلدٌ يَطْلُبُ أَيَّامَ ابْنِ عَجْلاَنَ، ثُمَّ لَمْ يَكُنْ ظَهرَ لَهُم قَلْبُ الأَسَانِيْدِ عَلَى الشُّيُوْخِ، إِنَّمَا فُعِلَ هَذَا بَعْدَ المائَتَيْنِ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ حَدِيْثٌ لابْنِ عَجْلاَنَ، عَنْ
(١) سقطت من الأصل، ولا بد منها. وتمام الخبر يوضح ذلك. (٢) أخرج هذه القصة الرامهرمزي، في " المحدث الفاصل " ص ٣٩٨ وقد تحرف فيه " عبد الله " إلى عبيد الله. وقد أخطأ محقق الكتاب حين قال في ترجمة ابن عجلان: أخرج له مسلم والاربعة. لان مسلما لم يخرج له إلا مقرونا بغيره، فلا بد من ذكر هذا القيد وابن عجلان حديثه من قبيل الحسن. سير ٦ / ٢١

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies