Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

his Sahih (1), and Muslim likewise recorded his report alongside that of Abū Isḥāq al-Shaybānī, as did the remaining four compilers of the Six.

ʿAbd al-Wārith said, “Layth was one of the vessels of knowledge.”

Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh remarked, “He was among the people who prayed and fasted the most; yet, whenever something reached him, he would not reject it.”

Ibn Shawdhub transmitted from Layth that he said, “I met the first generation of the Shiʿa in Kūfah, and they did not prefer anyone over Abū Bakr and ʿUmar.”

Ibn Ḥibbān stated, “Layth ibn Abī Sulaym—whose given name was Anas—was born in Kūfah and worked there as a teacher. He was one of the devoted worshippers, but toward the end of his life his mind became confused to the point that he no longer knew what he was narrating. He would invert chains of transmission, elevate incomplete reports, and attribute to reliable narrators material that was not theirs; all of this stemmed from his confusion.

“Because of this, Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān, Ibn al-Mahdī, Aḥmad, and Ibn Maʿīn abandoned his narrations.”

Layth narrated—from Mujāhid—on the authority of Ibn ʿUmar that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “Adultery bequeaths poverty.” (2)

Al-Ḥasan ibn Sufyān related it to us; Ḥarmalah related it to us; Abū Wahb related it to us; al-Māḍī ibn Muḥammad narrated it from him.

Layth also narrated—from Mujāhid—on the authority of ʿĀʾishah that the Prophet ﷺ said, “When sins become numerous…”

(1) In other words, it is cited in hanging form (taʿliq), as indicated by the symbol “kht” placed at the beginning of the chapter. One must remember that the muʿallaq (suspended) reports included by al-Bukhari in his Sahih do not rank with the fully-chained (musnad) reports: some are sahih (sound), others hasan (fair), and others daʿif (weak), as detailed in the specialist literature. Nevertheless, when al-Bukhari records a muʿallaq report with decisive wording, it is usually authentic. (2) Al-Sakhawi, al-Maqasid al-Hasanah, p. 234, attributes the hadith to al-Daylami and al-Qudaʿi through the chain of al-Madi b. Muhammad from Layth. The report is extremely weak: Layth had a poor memory, and his transmitter, al-Madi b. Muhammad, is described by Ibn ʿAdi as “munkar al-hadith” (his narrations are objectionable). Abu Hatim judged the hadith he related “invalid,” and al-Dhahabi notes in al-Mizan that al-Madi produced discredited reports, including this one, whose chain is exceptionally unsound.
(صَحِيْحِهِ (١)) ، وَرَوَى لَهُ مُسْلِمٌ مَقْرُوْناً بِأَبِي إِسْحَاقَ الشَّيْبَانِيِّ، وَالبَاقُوْنَ مِنَ السِّتَّةِ. وَقَدْ قَالَ عَبْدُ الوَارِثِ: كَانَ لَيْثٌ مِنْ أَوْعِيَةِ العِلْمِ. وَقَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ بنُ عَيَّاشٍ: كَانَ مِنْ أَكْثَرِ النَّاسِ صَلاَةً وَصِيَاماً، فَإِذَا وَقَعَ عَلَى شَيْءٍ، لَمْ يَرُدَّه. وَقَالَ ابْنُ شَوْذَبٍ: عَنْ لَيْثٍ، قَالَ: أَدْرَكْتُ الشِّيْعَةَ الأُوْلَى بِالكُوْفَةِ، وَمَا يُفَضِّلُوْنَ عَلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ أَحَداً. قَالَ ابْنُ حِبَّانَ: لَيْثُ بنُ أَبِي سُلَيْمٍ، وَاسْمُه: أَنَسٌ، وُلدَ بِالكُوْفَةِ، وَكَانَ مُعَلِّماً بِهَا، وَكَانَ مِنَ العُبَّادِ، وَلَكِنِ اخْتُلِطَ فِي آخِرِ عُمُرِهِ، حَتَّى كَانَ لاَ يَدْرِي مَا يُحَدِّثُ بِهِ، فَكَانَ يَقْلِبُ الأَسَانِيْدَ، وَيَرفَعُ المَرَاسِيْلَ، وَيَأْتِي عَنِ الثِّقَاتِ بِمَا لَيْسَ مِنْ حَدِيْثِهِم، كُلُّ ذَلِكَ كَانَ مِنْهُ فِي اخْتِلاَطِه. تَرَكَه: يَحْيَى القَطَّانُ، وَابْنُ مَهْدِيٍّ، وَأَحْمَدُ، وَابْنُ مَعِيْنٍ. رَوَى: لَيْثٌ، عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ: أَنَّ رَسُوْلَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ: (الزِّنَى يُوْرِثُ الفَقْرَ (٢)) . حَدَّثَنَاهُ الحَسَنُ بنُ سُفْيَانَ، حَدَّثَنَا حَرْمَلَةُ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو وَهْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا المَاضِي بنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْهُ. وَلَيْثٌ: عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ: عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ قَالَ: (إِذَا كَثُرَتْ ذُنُوْبُ
(١) أي تعليقا، كما هو منبه عليه في الرمز المذكور في أول الترجمة وهو " خت ". وينبغي أن يعلم أن ما أورده البخاري في صحيحه من الأحاديث المعلقة ليست في مرتبة الأحاديث المسندة، بل منها ما هو صحيح، ومنها ما هو حسن، ومنها ما هو ضعيف، كما هو مبين في محله. ولكنه حين يعلقه بصيغة الجزم، فالغالب عليه الصحة. (٢) نسبه السخاوي في " المقاصد الحسنة ": ٢٣٤ إلى الديلمي والقضاعي من حديث الماضي بن محمد، عن ليث..وهو حديث ضعيف جدا. ليث سيئ الحفظ، وراويه عنه، وهو الماضي بن محمد، قال ابن عدي فيه: منكر الحديث. وقال أبو حاتم: الحديث الذي رواه باطل. وقال المؤلف في " الميزان ": له أحاديث منكرة، منها بإسناد فيه ضعف بمرة، فذكر هذا الحديث.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies