Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Al-Aʿmash, on the authority of Abū Ṣāliḥ, said:
“Abū Hurayrah was among the most retentive of all the Companions.” (1)

Muḥammad ibn Rāshid, on the authority of Makḥūl, said:
“Abū Hurayrah used to remark, ‘There is many a pouch with Abū Hurayrah that he has never opened’—meaning: a pouch of knowledge.” (2)

I say: This demonstrates the permissibility of withholding certain reports that would provoke turmoil—whether in matters of doctrine, legal rulings, praise, or censure. However, any ḥadith that touches on what is lawful or unlawful must never be concealed, for such narrations are part of the clear proofs and guidance.

In Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī we read the statement of Imām ʿAlī: “Convey to the people what they can understand and leave aside what they repudiate; would you like Allah and His Messenger to be denied?” (3)

And likewise, had Abū Hurayrah

= Uways narrated from Abu Bakr ʿAbd al-Hamid, from Ibn Abi Dhib, from Saʿid al-Maqburi, from Abu Hurayra. It is also recorded in Tarikh Dimashq, 19/16/1. The scholars explain that the “container” whose contents he did not divulge refers to the reports that expose corrupt rulers, their conduct and the period in which they will appear. Abu Hurayra would hint at some of these reports without stating them openly, fearing for his life. He would say, for instance, “I seek refuge in Allah from the beginning of the sixties and from the rule of youngsters,” alluding to the caliphate of Yazid ibn Muʿawiya, which began in the year 60 AH. Allah answered his prayer, for Abu Hurayra died one year before that date. Ibn al-Munir remarked: Some people have turned this hadith into a pretext for validating their false claim that the sharia possesses an outer and an inner layer; their claim is nothing but a loosening of religious commitment. Abu Hurayra’s statement “they would cut (my head)” means that the tyrannical rulers would behead him if they heard his criticism of their deeds and his denunciation of their efforts. This is supported by the fact that, had the concealed reports contained legal rulings, he would not have been permitted to withhold them. (1) Tarikh Dimashq, 19/116/2. (2) Tarikh Dimashq, 19/116/2. (3) Reported by al-Bukhari, 1/199, Book of Knowledge, chapter “One who singles out a people with knowledge to the exclusion of others out of fear that they may not understand,” stopping before the words: “and leave what they disapprove.” The report is also found with Adam ibn Abi Iyas in his Kitab al-ʿIlm. Al-Hafiz wrote in Fath al-Bari: This shows that ambiguous material should not be presented to the general public. Comparable is Ibn Masʿud’s saying: “Whenever you relate to people a narration their minds cannot grasp, it becomes a trial for some of them,” recorded by Muslim in the introduction to his Sahih, 1/11.
الأَعْمَشُ: عَنْ أَبِي صَالِحٍ، قَالَ: كَانَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ مِنْ أَحْفَظِ الصَّحَابَةِ (١) . مُحَمَّدُ بنُ رَاشِدٍ: عَنْ مَكْحُوْلٍ، قَالَ: كَانَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ يَقُوْلُ: رُبَّ كِيْسٍ عِنْدَ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ لَمْ يَفْتَحْهُ -يَعْنِي: مِنَ العِلْمِ- (٢) . قُلْتُ: هَذَا دَالٌّ عَلَى جَوَازِ كِتْمَانِ بَعْضِ الأَحَادِيْثِ الَّتِي تُحَرِّكُ فِتْنَةً فِي الأُصُوْلِ أَوِ الفُرُوْعِ، أَوِ المَدْحِ وَالذَّمِّ، أَمَا حَدِيْثٌ يَتَعَلَّقُ بِحِلٍّ أَوْ حَرَامٍ فَلاَ يَحِلُّ كِتْمَانُهُ بِوَجْهٍ، فَإِنَّهُ مِنَ البَيِّنَاتِ وَالهُدَى. وَفِي (صَحِيْحِ البُخَارِيِّ) : قَوْلُ الإِمَامِ عَلِيٍّ ﵁: حَدِّثُوا النَّاسَ بِمَا يَعْرِفُوْنَ، وَدَعُوا مَا يُنْكِرُوْنَ، أَتُحِبُّوْنَ أَنْ يُكَذَّبَ اللهُ وَرَسُوْلُهُ (٣) . وَكَذَا لَوْ بَثَّ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ
= أويس، عن أبي بكر عبد الحميد، عن ابن أبي ذئب، عن سعيد المقبري، عن أبي هريرة. وهو في " تاريخ دمشق " ١٩ / ١٦ / ١. وقد حمل العلماء الوعاء الذي لم يبثه على الأحاديث التي فيها تبيين أمراء السوء وأحوالهم وزمنهم. وقد كان أبو هريرة يكني عن بعضه، ولا يصرح به خوفا على نفسه منهم، كقوله: أعوذ بالله من رأس الستين وإمارة الصبيان، يشير إلى خلافة يزيد بن معاوية، لأنها كانت سنة ستين من الهجرة، واستجاب الله دعاء أبي هريرة، فمات قبلها بسنة. وقال ابن المنير: جعل بعضهم هذا الحديث ذريعة إلى تصحيح باطلهم حيث اعتقدوا أن للشريعة ظاهرا وباطنا، وذلك الباطل، إنما حاصله الانحلال من الدين، وإنما أراد أبو هريرة بقوله: قطع، أي: قطع أهل الجور رأسه إذا سمعوا عيبه لفعلهم، وتضليله لسعيهم، ويؤيد ذلك أن الأحاديث المكتومة لو كانت من الاحكام الشرعية ما وسعه كتمانها. (١) تاريخ دمشق ١٩ / ١١٦ / ٢. (٢) تاريخ دمشق ١٩ / ١١٦ / ٢. (٣) أخرجه البخاري ١ / ١٩٩ في العلم: باب من خص بالعلم قوما دون قوم كراهية ألا يفهموا، دون قوله: " ودعوا ما ينكرون " وهي عند آدم بن أبي إياس في كتاب العلم له. قال الحافظ في " الفتح ": وفيه دليل على أن المتشابه لا ينبغي أن يذكر عند العامة، ومثله قول ابن مسعود: ما أنت محدثا قوما حديثا لا تبلغه عقولهم إلا كان لبعضهم فتنة. رواه مسلم في مقدمة صحيحه ١ / ١١.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies