Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

was Indian. He used to wear a tartūr—a tall, conical head-piece made of horsehair and dyed in various colors. His brother Ghiyāth al-Dīn was the handsomest of men and the fairest-skinned, yet he was oppressive; his mother was Turkish.

I say: His army was a rabble in whom wickedness, debauchery, and insolence were rife.

Al-Muwafaq said: “Fornication was common among them, and sodomy was not regarded as shameful by either old or young (1). Treachery was their habit: they took Tiflis under a pledge of safety, then betrayed the city, slaughtered its people, and carried off captives.

I say: They became proverbial for plunder and killing; they committed every vile act, a hungry, motley horde, weak in numbers and mounts.

Jalāl al-Dīn met the Tatars and routed them; their commander, a son (2) of Chinggis Khān, was slain. This enraged his father, who marched against him. The two armies met on the River Sind, and Chinggis Khān was defeated; but an ambush later struck, scattering Jalāl al-Dīn’s forces. He fled toward Ghazna in dire straits, with only four thousand men, themselves exhausted.

He then made for Kirmān, whose king treated him generously (3). Once strengthened, he betrayed and killed him (4), and advanced on Shīrāz; his soldiery rode oxen and donkeys, and many went on foot, so its ruler fled. Many events followed—too long to detail—alternating between rise and decline. The Tatars stood in awe of him; but for him, they would have trampled the whole world.

Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn al-Jawzī was sent to him as an envoy and found him reciting the Qur’an and weeping. He then excused the excesses of his troops, attributing them to their great numbers and their refusal to obey, and he had

(1) The formulation found in Tarikh al-Islam reads: “and liwat (sodomy) is neither disgraceful nor maʿadhuq provided that the elder and the younger consent.” Here, maʿadhuq means “suspended, hanging,” a usage taken from ʿidhq, the palm-cluster that includes the whole raceme with its offshoots. (2) This phrase is an editorial addition required by the context. (3) The manuscript has “to her,” a reading that makes no sense here. (4) The original report in Tarikh al-Islam states: “He set out for Kirman, where two great rulers received him kindly; once he had gathered strength he betrayed them and killed one of them.” Al-Dhahabi often reworks his sources, as we have pointed out on several occasions.
هِنديَّةٌ، وَكَانَ يَلبسُ طَرْطُوراً فِيْهِ مِنْ شِعرِ الخيلِ، مُصَبَّغاً بِأَلوَانٍ، وَكَانَ أَخُوْهُ غِيَاثُ الدِّيْنِ أَجْمَلَ النَّاسِ صُوْرَةً، وَأَرقَّهُم بَشَرَةً، لَكنَّهُ ظَلُوْمٌ، وَأُمُّهُ تُركِيَّةٌ. قُلْتُ: وَكَانَ عَسْكَرُهُ أَوبَاشاً، فِيهِم شَرٌّ وَفِسْقٌ وَعُتُوٌّ. قَالَ المُوَفَّقُ: الزِّنَى فِيهِم فَاشٍ، وَاللِّوَاطُ غَيْرُ مَعْذُوقٍ بِكِبَرٍ وَلاَ صِغَرٍ (١) ، وَالغَدْرُ خُلُقٌ لَهُم، أَخذُوا تَفلَيْسَ بِالأَمَانِ، ثُمَّ غدرُوا وَقتلُوا وَسَبَوا. قُلْتُ: كَانَ يُضْرَبُ بِهِمُ المَثَلُ فِي النَّهْبِ وَالقَتلِ، وَعَمِلُوا كُلَّ قَبِيحٍ، وَهُم جِيَاعٌ مُجَمِّعَةٌ، ضِعَافُ العُدَدِ وَالخيلِ، التقَى جَلاَلُ الدِّيْنِ التَّتَارَ فَهَزمَهُم، وَهَلَكَ مُقدَّمُهُم ابْنُ (٢) جِنْكِزْ خَان، فَعظُمَ عَلَى أَبِيْهِ، وَقصدَهُ، فَالتَقَى الجمعَانِ عَلَى نَهْرِ السِّنْدِ، فَانْهَزَم جِنْكِزْ خَان، ثُمَّ خَرَجَ لَهُ كَمِينٌ، فَتفلَّلَ جَمعُ جَلاَلِ الدِّيْنِ، وَفَرَّ إِلَى نَاحِيَةِ غَزْنَةَ فِي حَالٍ وَاهيَةٍ، وَمَعَهُ أَرْبَعَةُ آلاَفٍ فِي غَايَةِ الضَّعْفِ، فَتوجَّهَ نَحْو كِرْمَانَ، فَأَحْسَنَ إِلَيْهِ (٣) مَلِكُهَا، فَلَمَّا تَقَوَّى، غدَرَ بِهِ وَقتلَهُ (٤) ، وَسَارَ إِلَى شِيْرَازَ، وَعَسْكَرُهُ عَلَى بَقَرٍ وَحَمِيْرٍ وَمشَاةٌ، فَفَرَّ مِنْهُ صَاحِبُهَا، وَجَرَتْ لَهُ أُمُوْرٌ يَطولُ شَرحُهَا، مَا بَيْنَ ارْتقَاءٍ وَانخفَاضٍ، وَهَابَتْهُ التَّتَارُ، وَلَولاَهُ لَدَاسُوا الدُّنْيَا، وَقَدْ ذَهَبَ إِلَيْهِ مُحْيِي الدِّيْنِ ابْنُ الجَوْزِيِّ رَسُوْلاً، فَوَجَدَهُ يَقرَأُ فِي مُصحَفٍ وَيَبْكِي. ثُمَّ اعتذَرَ عَمَّا يَفعلُهُ جُندُهُ بِكَثرَتِهِم، وَعَدَمِ طَاعَتِهِم، وَقَدْ
(١) أصل العبارة في تاريخ الإسلام: " واللواط ليس بقبيح ولا معذوقا بشرط الكبر والصغر "، فمعذوق هنا معناه: معلق، أخذه من العذق، وهو عذق النخلة ويشمل العرجون بما فيه من الشماريخ. (٢) إضافة منا يقتضيها السياق. (٣) في الأصل: " إليها " ولا يستقيم المعنى بها. (٤) أصل الخبر في تاريخ الإسلام: " وتوجه نحو كرمان، وكان هناك ملكان كبيران فأحسنا إليه فلما قوي شيئا غدر بهما وقتل أحدهما " والذهبي ﵀ كثير التصرف بالنصوص، كما بينا غير مرة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies