He studied under Ibn ʿAqīl and Ibn al-Zāghūnī, and he heard hadith from Ibn Mallah. For a time he applied himself to study, led the prayers in the mosque where he resided, engaged in debate, and issued legal opinions.
Ibn al-Jawzī (1) said: “From his slips of the tongue one can sense the unsoundness of his creed. He was undisciplined and inclined toward the philosophers. He once said to me, ‘I am now contending with the falak al-aflak (2).’”
Judge Abū Yaʿlā the Younger told me: “Ever since Ṣadaqah copied Ibn Sīnā’s The Healing, he has changed.”
He said to al-Ẓahīr the Ḥanafī: “I actually rejoice in my stumbling, for the Maker is aiming at me.”
He died in Rabīʿ al-Ākhir 573 AH, in his early eighties.
He used to beg although he had no need (3), and he left three hundred dinars.
Repulsive dreams are transmitted about him—may Allah protect us from wretchedness.
(1) Al-Muntazam, vol. 10, p. 276.
(2) This is how the phrase appears in the base manuscript. In the copy of Al-Muntazam by Ibn al-Jawzi, from which the author is quoting, it reads: “I only dispute with one who is above the celestial sphere,” whereas in Tarikh al-Islam it is: “I am now disputing above the celestial sphere.”
(3) Ibn Rajab reports from Ibn al-Najjar: “He copied many books in his own hand across the various sciences; his livelihood came from the fee he received for this copying. He never asked anyone for anything, nor did he take up residence in a madrasa. He spent most of his life of little means, with frustrated ambitions, a troubled existence and persistent poverty … At times he would confide his situation to a trusted friend, but someone with an agenda would then publicize it, claiming, ‘He objects to divine decree,’ and would impute to him matters whose reality God alone knows.” (Dhayl, 1/339-340). It seems to us that Ibn al-Jawzi disparaged him at length in his history, and not all of it was warranted. Abu al-Hasan al-Qati‘i, as cited by the hadith scholar Ibn Rajab, said: “There was deep mutual estrangement between him and Ibn al-Jawzi, and each said about the other statements whose truth God knows.” (Dhayl, 1/340). Conversely, the Baghdadi hadith scholar al-Muhibb Ibn al-Najjar praised him in his Chronicle, saying: “He produced fine works on the principles of religion, and he compiled an annalistic history that he began with the death of his teacher Ibn al-Zaghuni in 527/1133, appending it to his teacher’s chronicle. He continued writing in it until shortly before his own death, recording events and obituaries.” (Dhayl, 1/339). This history by Sadaqa was one of Ibn al-Dhibithi’s primary sources for his own continuation to the continuation of Ibn al-Samʿani; see the Introduction to Ibn al-Dhibithi’s Dhayl Tarikh Madinat al-Salam, 1/40.