Siyar Aʿlām al-NubalāʾShams al‑Din al‑Dhahabi

Mosul in the company of Zangī. The judges, witnesses, and scholars were thereupon summoned to the vizier Abū l-Qāsim ʿAlī; they drew up an official record in which upright witnesses testified to the wrongs perpetrated by al-Rāshid—his confiscation of wealth, shedding of blood, and consumption of wine. The jurists were then consulted: does the imamate of one who commits such acts remain valid, and, once his depravity is established, may the reigning sultan depose him and put another in his place? They issued a fatwa allowing his removal and replacement. Accordingly, on the following morning, in the presence of Masʿūd and his emirs, the choice made in the Palace of the Caliphate settled on his uncle, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn al-Mustazhir bi-Llāh, whom they titled al-Muqtafī. He was forty years old, streaked with grey, dark-complexioned, and his mother was a fair-skinned concubine named Sitt al-Sādah. ⦗1⦘

He went on: We later learned that al-Rāshid left Mosul for the lands of Azerbaijan, making for Marāgha with a band of followers. They extorted its people and wrought havoc; then they proceeded to Hamadhān, where they killed inhabitants, shaved the beards of a number of jurists, and behaved tyrannically. Moving on to the environs of Isfahān, they plundered the villages and laid siege to the city together with troops belonging to Dāwud ibn Maḥmūd ibn Muḥammad. Al-Rāshid was stricken with an illness that brought him to the brink of death. We were informed that a group of Persian attendants in his service conspired against him; they entered his pavilion on the twenty-seventh of Ramadan in the year thirty-two (532 AH) and killed him.

(1) Ibn al-Athir, al-Kamil, vol. 11, pp. 40 and 42. The description attributed to al-Rashid in this decree is, in all likelihood, a contrived fabrication—an ornate falsehood that the judges and witnesses were forced to endorse out of fear of the one who held absolute power. As already noted at the beginning of al-Rashid’s biography, his conduct was commendable and he was devoted to justice. Such is the nature of tyranny and the craving for domination: they drive their possessor to lie, invent charges, and accuse predecessors of offences from which they are completely innocent, seeking unlawful means to reach their goal. Historians must therefore fear Allah, scrutinise opinions, and discard any reports that serious, methodical study—built on sound principles—reveals to be false or fabricated, so that they may be free of responsibility before the One from whom nothing is hidden.
المَوْصِل صُحْبَة زنكِي، فَأُحْضِرَ القُضَاةُ وَالشُّهُودُ وَالعُلَمَاء عِنْد الوَزِيْر أَبِي القَاسِمِ عَلِيّ، وَكتبُوا محضراً فِيْهِ شهَادَة الْعُدُول بِمَا جرَى مِنَ الرَّاشد مِنَ الظُّلم، وَأَخْذِ الأَمْوَال، وَسَفْكِ الدِّمَاءِ، وشُرب الخَمْر، وَاسْتفتِي الفُقَهَاء فِيْمَنْ فَعل ذَلِكَ، هَلْ تَصِحُّ إِمَامتُهُ؟ وَهل إِذَا ثَبَتَ فِسقُه بِذَلِكَ يَجوز لسُلْطَان الوَقْت أَنْ يَخلعه وَيستبدل بِهِ؟، فَأَفْتَوْا بجَوَازِ خلعه، وَالاستبدَال بِهِ، فَوَقَعَ الاختيَارُ مَعَ الغدِ بِحُضُوْر مَسْعُوْد وَأُمرَائِهِ فِي دَارِ الخِلاَفَة عَلَى عَمِّهِ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللهِ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ المُسْتظهر بِاللهِ، وَلَقَّبوهُ بِالمُقتفِي، وَلَهُ أَرْبَعُوْنَ سَنَةً، وَقَدْ وَخطه شيب، وَهُوَ أَسْمَرُ، وَأُمُّه أُمُّ وَلد صَفْرَاء تُدْعَى سِتُّ السَّادَةِ (١) . قَالَ: ثُمَّ بَلَغَنَا أَنَّ الرَّاشد خَرَجَ مِنَ المَوْصِلِ إِلَى بِلاَدِ أَذْرَبِيْجَان إِلَى مُرَاغَةَ، وَكَانَ مَعَهُ جَمَاعَةٌ، فَصَادرُوا أَهْلَهَا، وَعَاثُوا، ثُمَّ ذهبُوا إِلَى هَمَذَان، فَقتلُوا بِهَا، وَحلقُوا لِحَى جَمَاعَةٍ مِنَ الفُقَهَاء، وَعَتَوْا، وَمَضَوْا إِلَى نوَاحِي أَصْبَهَان، فَانْتهبُوا القُرَى، وَحَاصرُوا البلدَ فِي جَمعٍ مِنْ أَجنَاد دَاوُد بن مَحْمُوْدِ بنِ مُحَمَّدٍ، فَمَرِضَ الرَّاشدُ مرضاً أَشفَى مِنْهُ، بَلَغَنَا أَنَّ جَمَاعَة مِنَ الْعَجم فَرَّاشين كَانُوا فِي خدمته؛ اتَّصَلُوا بِهِ هُنَاكَ؛ دَخَلُوا خَرَكَاهَهُ فِي السَّابِع وَالعِشْرِيْنَ مِنْ رَمَضَانَ، سَنَةَ اثْنَتَيْنِ وَثَلاَثِيْنَ، فَقَتلُوْهُ
(١) الكامل لابن الأثير: ١١ / ٤٠، ٤٢. وما وصف به الراشد في هذا المحضر يغلب على الظن أنه كذب ملفق، وباطل منمق، أكره على توثيقه القضاة والشهود خوفا ممن بيده الحل والعقد والسلطان، وقد تقدم في أول ترجمة الراشد أنه كان حسن السيرة، مؤثرا للعدل، وهكذا يحمل البغي وحب التسلط صاحبه على الكذب والافتراء واتهام من كان قبله بما هم منه براء، والتماس الوسيلة غير المشروعة للحصول على غايته. فليتق الله المؤرخون، وليمحصوا الآراء، وليطرحوا الاخبار التي يتبين لهم بطلانها وافتراؤها بالدراسة الجادة المبنية على أسس صحيحة وسديدة ليخرجوا بذلك من المسؤولية أمام الله الذي لا تخفى عليه خافية.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies