He and Ibn Zaydūn were like two racehorses neck-and-neck for the prize. Al-Mahrī rose to the loftiest ranks: al-Muʿtamid ibn ʿAbbād appointed him vizier and then made him his deputy in Murcia. There he rebelled and took the city for himself, so al-Muʿtamid resorted to subtle stratagems until Ibn ʿAmmār fell into his grasp. He executed him in cold blood for his insurrection after such lavish kindness—and because he had lampooned al-Muʿtamid and his forefathers, for he is the one who said (1):
Among the things that make the very mention of al-Andalus repugnant to me
is to hear of a “Muʿtamid” and a “Muʿtaḍid” ruling there.
Royal titles set where they do not belong—
like a house-cat puffing itself up to imitate a lion’s charge. (2)
At first Ibn ʿAmmār criss-crossed al-Andalus praising kings, grandees, and commoners alike; he even praised a farmer who had given him a sack of barley for his donkey. When fortune elevated him to high office, he filled that farmer’s sack with silver dirhams, saying, “Had he filled it with wheat, we would have filled it with gold.”
Al-Muʿtamid had him imprisoned for a time, and Ibn ʿAmmār sought his mercy with poems that could soften stone, but al-Muʿtamid still put him to death in the year 479 AH (3).