In it, the sīn has been changed into an alif (1).
Shaykh ʿIzz al-Dīn ibn ʿAbd al-Salām—himself one of the independent jurists—said: “I have not encountered in the Islamic books on (2) sacred knowledge anything like al-Muḥallā (3) by Ibn Ḥazm and al-Mughnī by Shaykh Muwaffaq al-Dīn (4).”
I say: Shaykh ʿIzz al-Dīn spoke the truth.
A third work is al-Sunan al-Kabīr by al-Bayhaqī, and the fourth (5) is al-Tamhīd by Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr.
Whoever masters these volumes, is among the sharp-witted muftis (6), and makes a habit of constant study of them (7), such a person is a scholar in the fullest sense.
Ibn Ḥazm produced other imposing works as well. The largest is al-Iṣāl ilā Fahm Kitāb al-Khiṣāl, running to fifteen thousand folios (8); and there is also al-Khiṣāl (9), which preserves the principal
(1) The Majmaʿ Press edition reads: “the alif has been turned into a sin,” which is incorrect. Ibn Qutayba notes in Taʾwil Mushkil al-Qurʾan, p. 267: the verb dasaha comes from dasastu; one of the two s letters was changed into a y, just as one says labbaytu (from lababtu) and qasaytu azfari (from qasastu). Many other examples exist. See also Maʿani al-Qurʾan by al-Farraʾ, 3/267.
(2) The Majmaʿ edition reads “min” instead of “fi.”
(3) In Tadhkirat al-Huffaz, 3/1150, the title is misprinted as al-Mujalla with a jim.
(4) The person meant is Imam Muwaffaq al-Din Abu Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Qudama al-Maqdisi al-Dimashqi (d. 620/1223), a leading authority of the Hanbali school. His book al-Mughni, a commentary on al-Khiraqi’s Mukhtasar, is one of the greatest legal works, gathering the views of all the juristic schools—including those that have died out—and weighing between them. The work is already in print and circulation; may God enable us to produce a critical edition that does it full justice.
(5) The manuscript reads: “and their fourth.”
(6) The manuscript reads: “the muftis.”
(7) The manuscript reads: “in them.”
(8) Al-Dhahabi says in Tadhkirat al-Huffaz, 3/1147: “In it he cites the statements of the Companions and those who followed them, together with the proof for each view.” This book is a commentary on his own work al-Khisal al-jamiʿa li-jumal Sharaʾiʿ al-Islam wa-l-halal wa-l-haram wa-l-sunna wa-l-ijmaʿ, which the author will mention below. His son Abu Rafiʿ abridged part of it to supply some missing sections of al-Muhalla. See the Catalogue of the Egyptian National Library, 1/555.
(9) Both the manuscript and the Majmaʿ edition read al-Isal instead of al-Khisal, which is a mistake; “al-Isal,” just as— [footnote continues].