to the same scale, amounting to seventy fascicles (1).
I say: these are exceedingly large volumes.
Ibn Ḥazm remarked, “I know of nothing like it in the discussion of the jurisprudence of hadith—so how could anything be better? (2)”
He later compiled al-Istidhkār li-Madhhab ʿUlamāʾ al-Amṣār fīmā Taḍammanahu al-Muwaṭṭaʾ min Maʿānī al-Raʾy wa-l-Āthār (3), a full commentary on the Muwaṭṭaʾ; produced the magnificent and useful al-Istiʿāb fī Asmāʾ al-Ṣaḥābah (4); and authored Jāmiʿ Bayān al-ʿIlm wa-Faḍlihi wa-Mā Yanbaghī fī Riwayatihi wa-Ḥamlihi (5), along with many other works.
He was granted success in writing, aided by Allah in it, and Allah made his books beneficial. Besides his pre-eminence in transmitted reports and his insight into jurisprudence and the meanings of hadith, he had wide-ranging expertise in genealogy and historiography (6).
A number of scholars have stated that Abū ʿUmar served as judge of Lisbon (Ushbūna) and Santarém (Shantarīn) (7) during the time of al-Muẓaffar ibn al-Aftas (8).