al-Haramayn. This, however, contradicts Ibn al-Athir; see Wafayat al-Ayan 5:138. Ibn al-Athir further notes that he is said to have repented of his attacks on al-Shafi‘i (al-Kamil 10:33), while Mukhtasar Tarikh Dawlat Al-Saljuq, p. 31, states that he abandoned partisanship and reconciled the two factions. (1) Mukhtasar Tarikh Dawlat Al-Saljuq, p. 32; Wafayat al-Ayan 5:142. A full biography of Nizam al-Mulk will appear in vol. 19, no. 93. (*) Jadhwat al-Muqtabis, 390; al-Sila 2:470-472; Bughyat al-Multamis, 515-516; al-Suyuti, Tabaqat al-Mufassirin, 27-28; al-Adnawi, Tabaqat al-Mufassirin, fol. 33b; al-Dawudi, Tabaqat al-Mufassirin 2:37-39; Nafh al-Tib 3:423 and 4:335. The nisba “al-Riyuli” does not occur in the genealogical manuals. Jadhwa records it as “al-Awriyuwali,” i.e. from “Orihuela,” which Ibn Khallikan vocalises as: hamza fatḥa, wāw sukūn, rāʾ kasra, yāʾ ḍamma, wāw fatḥa, lām fatḥa, hāʾ (Wafayat al-Ayan 3:107). Mujam al-Buldan and al-Rawd al-Mi‘tar write it “Orihuela,” a district of Murcia 23 km to the north-east. Al-Humaydi mentions yet another nisba, “al-Hajari.” See the next comment. (2) Al-Humaydi lists him in Jadhwa under those known only by a kunya, without establishing his name, and says: “I incline to think that he is Isma‘il b. Ahmad al-Hajari, because the description suits him, and I was his contemporary; we have given him an entry under his name.” Al-Dhabi, following Humaydi in al-Bughya, repeats this and adds: “I have seen some who say his name is al-Qasim b. al-Fath.” (3) A city in al-Andalus between al-Jawf and the east of Cordoba, nowadays Wadi al-Hajara (Guadalajara); Mujam al-Buldan 4:247. Hence the nisba “al-Hajari” in Jadhwa, al-Bughya and Nafh al-Tib. (4) A nisba to Shantajala (also called Jinjala), a fortress in al-Andalus north of Murcia; see Mujam al-Buldan 3:367 and al-Rawd al-Mi‘tar 347. Al-Sila writes it “al-Shantajyali.”