Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

“Repeat the prayer,” he would be causing them to abandon an obligatory prayer; and abandoning an obligatory prayer is not permissible except for a legislated excuse that permits it. This is not such an excuse. Hence, the scholars have said: Whoever begins an obligatory act of worship is forbidden to discontinue it except for a valid excuse (1). This is not a valid excuse. The basic principle, therefore, is that their prayer is valid and that they may not leave it.

If he does not appoint a successor, they may appoint one of themselves to complete the prayer with them. If they do not do so, they should complete it individually. However, it is preferable that he appoint a successor, so that they are not confused.

Note: According to the preponderant view, there is nothing by which the follower’s prayer is invalidated merely because the imam’s prayer is invalidated, except in matters in which the imam acts on behalf of the follower. Whatever the imam performs on behalf of the follower is such that, if it is defective, the follower’s prayer is consequently defective, because that act of the imam is performed for both himself and the followers. An example is the prayer-screen: the imam’s prayer-screen serves as a prayer-screen for those behind him. Thus, if a woman passes between the imam and his prayer-screen, the imam’s prayer is invalidated, as is the followers’ prayer, because this prayer-screen is shared. For this reason, we do not instruct the follower to set up a prayer-screen; indeed, if he were to do so, he would be regarded as an excessive innovator. Thus, violating the imam’s prayer-screen constitutes a violation of the follower’s prayer-screen, and the follower’s prayer is invalidated just as the imam’s prayer is invalidated.

Here is an important principle: whoever enters into an act of worship and performs it as commanded, we do not declare it invalid except on the basis of evidence, for the basic principle is validity and discharge of one’s obligation—unless evidence establishing invalidity arises.

With the praise of Allah Most High, the second volume has ended.

It will be followed, by the will of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, by the third volume, which begins with: “Chapter on the Description of the Prayer.”

(1) See: al-Insaf, 7:549-550; al-Iqna, 1:511.
استأنفوا الصَّلاة أخرجهم من فرض، والخروج من الفرض لا يجوز إلا بسبب شرعي يُبيح ذلك، وليس هذا سبباً شرعيًّا، ولهذا قال العلماء: من دخل في فرض حَرُمَ عليه قطعه إلا بعُذر (١)، وهذا ليس بعُذر؛ فالأصل صحَّة صلاتهم، وعدم جواز الخروج منها، فإن لم يستخلفْ فلهم أن يقدِّموا أحدَهم ليتمَّ بهم الصَّلاة، فإن لم يفعلوا أتمُّوها فُرادى، ولكن الأَوْلَى أن يستخلفَ؛ لئلا يحصُل عليهم تشويش. تنبيه: ليس هناك شيءٌ تبطلُ به صلاةُ المأموم ببطلان صلاة الإمام على القول الرَّاجح؛ إلا فيما يقوم فيه الإمامُ مقامَ المأموم، والذي يقوم فيه الإمامُ مقامَ المأموم هو الذي إذا اختلَّ اختلت بسببه صلاةُ المأموم؛ لأنَّ ذلك الفعل من الإمام للإمام وللمأمومين، مثل: السُّترة؛ فالسُّترة للإمام سُتْرَة لمن خلفه، فإذا مرَّت امرأة بين الإمام وسُترته بطلت صلاة الإمام وبطلت صلاة المأموم؛ لأنَّ هذه السُّترة مشتركة، ولهذا لا نأمر المأموم أن يتَّخِذَ سُترة، بل لو اتَّخذ سُترة لعُدَّ متنطِّعاً مبتدعاً، فصار انتهاك السُّترة في حَقِّ الإمام انتهاكاً في حَقِّ المأموم، فبطلت صلاة المأموم كما بطلت صلاة الإمام. وهنا قاعدة مهمَّة وهي: أنَّ من دخل في عبادة فأدَّاها كما أُمِرَ؛ فإننا لا نُبْطِلُها إلا بدليل؛ لأن الأصلَ الصِّحةُ وإبراءُ الذِّمة؛ حتى يقوم دليل البطلان. انتهى بحمد الله تعالى المجلَّدُ الثَّاني ويليه بمشيئة الله ﷿ المجلَّدُ الثالث وأوَّله: «باب صفة الصَّلاة».
(١) انظر: «الإنصاف» (٧/ ٥٤٩، ٥٥٠)، «الإقناع» (١/ ٥١١).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies