Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

As for the second: if he makes discontinuing it contingent upon a condition, then according to the established school, the prayer is invalidated.

As for the third: if he is undecided whether to discontinue it or not, then according to the established school, it is invalidated. The correct view in both issues, however, is that it is not invalidated.

The fourth case is when he resolves to commit a prohibited act but does not do it. In this case, the prayer is not invalidated, because invalidation here is contingent upon committing the prohibited act, and that has not occurred.

If he doubts whether he formed the intention, he must begin it again.

His statement, “If he doubts whether he formed the intention, he must begin it again,” means that if he doubts whether or not he made the intention, he must begin it again—that is, the prayer—because the basic presumption is that it was absent.

Yet one may ask: does such a case actually arise? That is, can a person perform ablution, come to the mosque, begin the prayer with the opening takbir, and then say, “I doubt whether I made the intention”? Apparently, this is not possible, and the issue is hypothetical—unless he is afflicted by obsessive misgivings, in which case his doubts are of no consequence. For this reason, the poet said:

Doubt after an act has been done has no effect;
And likewise when doubts become frequent. (1)

When doubts become frequent, this is obsessive misgiving and is not taken into account. Thus, it is difficult to conceive of this case, for it is impossible for a rational person who knows what he is doing to enter the prayer, pronounce the opening takbir, and recite, then say, “I doubted whether I made the intention.” For this reason, some scholars said: If Allah had required us to perform an act without an intention, that would have been imposing what is beyond one’s capacity. (2)

Nevertheless, assuming that such a case occurs—even theoretically—we say: if he doubts whether he made the intention, he must begin the act of worship again, because the basic presumption is nonexistence, and he has doubted whether it exists or not.

(1) See Manzumah fi Usul al-Fiqh wa Qawaid Fiqhiyyah (A Poem on the Principles of Jurisprudence and Legal Maxims), by the author, may Allah have mercy on him, p. 10. (2) See Majmu al-Fatawa, 18/262; Ighathat al-Lahfan, 1/134.
وأما الثاني: فإذا علَّق القطع على شرط، فالمذهب: أنها تبطل. وأما الثالث: فإذا تردَّد هل يقطعها أم لا؟ فالمذهب أنها تبطل، والصَّحيح في المسألتين: أنها لا تبطل. الرَّابع: إذا عزم على فعل محظور ولم يفعله، فهنا لا تبطل؛ لأن البطلان هنا معلَّق بفعل المحظور ولم يوجد. وإِذَا شَكَّ فِيهَا استَأْنَفَها. قوله: «وإذا شَكَّ فيها استأنفَها»، أي: إذا شكَّ هل نوى أم لم ينوِ، فإنه يستأنفها؛ أي: الصَّلاة؛ وذلك لأنَّ الأصل العدم. ولكن يبقى: هل هذه الصُّورة واردة، بمعنى: هل يمكن أن يأتي إنسان ويتوضَّأ ويقدم إلى المسجد ويكبِّر ويقول: أنا أشكُّ في النيَّة؟ الظاهر: أن هذا لا يمكن، وأن المسألة فرضيَّة، إلا أن يكون موسوساً والموسوس لا عِبْرَة بشكِّه، ولهذا قال الناظم: والشكُّ بعد الفعل لا يؤثِّر وهكذا إذا الشكوك تكثر (١) فإذا كثُرت الشكوك فهذا وسواس لا يُعتدُّ به، ولهذا فإنَّ تَصوُّرَ هذه المسألة صعب؛ لأنه من المستحيل أن يكون إنسان عاقل يدري ما يفعل؛ أن يأتي ويدخل في الصلاة، ويكبِّر ويقرأ؛ ثم يقول: أنا شككتُ في النيَّة، ولهذا قال بعض أهل العلم: لو كلَّفنا الله عملاً بلا نيَّة لكان من تكليف ما لا يُطاق (٢). لكن على تقدير وجوده ـ ولو نظريًّا ـ فإننا نقول: إذا شكَّ في النيَّة وجب أن يستأنف العبادة؛ لأن الأصل عدم الوجود، وهو قد شكَّ في
(١) انظر: «منظومة في أصول الفقه وقواعد فقهية» للمؤلف ﵀ ص (١٠). (٢) انظر: «مجموع الفتاوى» (١٨/ ٢٦٢)، «إغاثة اللهفان» (١/ ١٣٤)

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies