Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His statement, “the disbelievers,” includes both the original disbeliever and the apostate.

His statement, “even if their slaughtered animals are not lawful,” alludes to a point of disagreement (1). The only disbelievers whose slaughtered animals are lawful are the Jews and Christians, as Allah the Exalted says:

“And the food of those who were given the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them.” [al-Ma’idah 5:5]

What is meant by their food is their slaughtered animals, as Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) explained (2). It does not mean their bread, barley, and the like, for these are lawful for us whether they come from them or from others.

The slaughtered animals of the Zoroastrians, atheists, idolaters, and other disbelievers are not lawful. Their vessels, however, are permissible to use. If someone asks, “What is the evidence?” we say: it is the general import of Allah’s statement:

“It is He who created for you all that is on the earth.” [al-Baqarah 2:29]

Moreover, when Allah permitted for us the food of the People of the Book, it is known that they would sometimes bring it to us cooked in their own vessels. It is also established that a Jewish youth invited the Prophet, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, to barley bread and rancid melted fat (3), and he ate from it. Likewise, he ate from the poisoned sheep that was presented to him as a gift at Khaybar (4). It is also established that he and his Companions performed ablution from a woman’s waterskin.

(1) See al-Insaf, 1:156. (2) Narrated by al-Bukhari, Book of Slaughtering and Hunting, chapter: “The Slaughtered Animals of the People of the Book,” no. 5508. (3) Narrated by Ahmad, 3:210, 270. However, al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar cites this hadith in Atraf al-Musnad, 1:472, with the wording, “that a tailor,” instead of, “a Jew.” This agrees with the remaining narrations in the Musnad, 3:252, 289-290, and also with the narration of al-Bukhari, no. 5379, except that it does not mention barley bread or rancid fat. Note: ihalah means fat, and sankhah means altered or rancid. Gharib al-Hadith, 1:503. (4) Narrated by al-Bukhari, Book of Medicine, chapter: “What Is Mentioned Regarding the Poisoning of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him,” no. 5777, on the authority of Abu Hurayrah.
وقوله: «الكفَّار» يشمل الكافر الأصلي والمرتد. وقوله: «ولو لم تحِلَّ ذبائحُهُم» إِشارة خلاف (١). والكفَّار الذين تَحِلُّ ذبائحُهم هم اليهود والنَّصارى فقط. لقوله تعالى: ﴿وَطَعَامُ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ حِلٌّ لَكُمْ وَطَعَامُكُمْ حِلٌّ لَهُمْ﴾ [المائدة: ٥]. والمراد بطعامهم ذبائحهم كما فسَّر ذلك ابن عباس ﵄ (٢)، وليس المراد خبزهم وشعيرهم وما أشبه ذلك؛ لأن ذلك حلال لنا منهم ومن غيرهم، ولا تحلُّ ذبائح المجوس، والدَّهريِّين، والوثنيِّين وغيرهم من الكفار، أما آنيتهم فتحلُّ. فإن قال قائل: ما هو الدَّليل؟ قلنا: عموم قوله تعالى: ﴿هُوَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ لَكُمْ مَا فِي الأَرْضِ جَمِيعًا﴾ [البقرة: ٢٩]، ثم إن أهل الكتاب إذا أباح الله لنا طعامهم، فمن المعلوم أنهم يأتون به إلينا أحياناً مطبوخاً بأوانيهم، ثم إِنَّه ثبت أن النبي ﷺ دعاه غلام يهوديٌّ على خبز شعير، وإِهالة سَنِخَة (٣) فأكل منها. وكذلك أكل من الشَّاة المسمومة التي أُهديت له ﷺ في خيبر (٤). وثبت أنَّه ﷺ توضَّأ وأصحابه من مزادة امرأة
(١) انظر: «الإِنصاف» (١/ ١٥٦). (٢) رواه البخاري، كتاب الذبائح والصيد: باب ذبائح أهل الكتاب، رقم (٥٥٠٨). (٣) رواه أحمد (٣/ ٢١٠، ٢٧٠)، إِلا أن الحافظ ابن حجر قد نقل هذا الحديث في «أطراف المسند» (١/ ٤٧٢) بلفظ: «أن خيَّاطاً» بدل «يهودياً»، وهو الموافق لبقية روايات المسند (٣/ ٢٥٢، ٢٨٩ ـ ٢٩٠)، وهو الموافق أيضاً لرواية البخاري رقم (٥٣٧٩) غير أنه لم يذكر خبز الشعير والإِهالة السَّنخة. ملاحظة: الإِهالة: الدسم، والسّنخة: المتغيرة. «غريب الحديث» (١/ ٥٠٣). (٤) رواه البخاري، كتاب الطب: باب ما يذكر في سُمِّ النبي ﷺ، رقم (٥٧٧٧) عن أبي هريرة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies