Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

this is not a need, but rather a necessity (1). Necessity makes both gold and silver permissible, whether used independently or incidentally. Thus, if someone is compelled to drink from a gold vessel, he may do so, because it is a case of necessity.

It is disliked to come into direct contact with it without a need . . .

His statement, “It is disliked to come into direct contact with it without a need,” means that it is disliked to come into direct contact with a small silver band. Direct contact means that, if he wishes to drink from this banded vessel, he drinks from the side where the silver is, so that his lips come into contact with it, even though it is lawful.

In the terminology of the jurists, what is disliked is that which has been prohibited, though not in a manner requiring one to refrain from it. The one who leaves it out of compliance is rewarded, while the one who does it is not punished—unlike what is forbidden, for the one who does it deserves punishment. This is according to the terminology of the jurists.

As for the Quran and the sunnah, the term “disliked” may be used to mean what is forbidden. Thus, after Allah, Exalted is He, listed a number of prohibited matters in Surah al-Isra, He said: “All that—the evil of it is ever, in the sight of your Lord, detested.” [al-Isra]

The Prophet, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, said: “Indeed, Allah has disliked for you gossip, excessive questioning, and wasting wealth” (2).

Dislike is a legal ruling that can only be established by evidence. Whoever affirms it without evidence, we reject his statement, just as we reject the statement of one who declares something forbidden without evidence.

Based on this principle, we examine the author’s words. He said, “It is disliked

(1) See Majmu al-Fatawa, 21:81. (2) Narrated by al-Bukhari, Book of Loans, chapter: “What Is Forbidden Regarding the Waste of Wealth,” no. 2408; and Muslim, Book of Judicial Matters, chapter: “The Prohibition of Asking Excessive Questions Without Need,” no. 1715, on the authority of Abu Hurayrah.
هذه ليست حاجة، بل ضرورة (١)، والضَّرورة تُبيحُ الذَّهبَ والفضة مفرداً وتبعاً، فلو اضطر إِلى أن يشرب في آنية الذَّهب فله ذلك، لأنَّها ضرورة. وتُكْره مباشرتُها لغير حاجةٍ .................. قوله: «وتُكره مباشرتها لغير حاجة»، أي: تُكره مباشرة الضَّبَّة اليسيرة، ومعنى مباشرتها: أنَّه إِذا أراد أن يشرب من هذا الإِناء المضبَّب شرب من عند الفِضَّة، فيباشرها بشفتيه وهي حلال. والمكروه عند الفقهاء: ما نُهي عنه لا على سبيل الإِلزام بالتَّرك. وحكمه: أنه يُثابُ تاركُه امتثالاً، ولا يُعاقبُ فاعلُه، بخلاف الحرام، فإن فاعله يستحقُّ العقوبة، وهذا في اصطلاح الفقهاء. أما في القرآن والسُّنَّة، فإن المكروه يأتي للمحرَّم، ولهذا لما عدَّد الله تعالى أشياء محرَّمة في سورة الإسراء قال: ﴿كُلُّ ذَلِكَ كَانَ سَيِّئُهُ عِنْدَ رَبِّكَ مَكْرُوهًا *﴾ [الإسراء]. وقال ﷺ: «إن الله كَرِهَ لكم قيل وقال، وكَثْرَةَ السُّؤال، وإِضاعة المال» (٢). والكراهة: حُكم شرعيٌّ لا تثبت إِلا بدليل، فمن أثبتها بغير دليل، فإِننا نردُّ قوله، كما لو أثبت التَّحريم بلا دليل، فإِننا نردُّ قوله. وبناءً على هذه القاعدة ننظر إلى كلام المؤلِّف، قال: «تُكره
(١) انظر: «مجموع الفتاوى» (٢١/ ٨١). (٢) رواه البخاري، كتاب في الاستقراض: باب ما يُنهى عن إِضاعة المال، رقم (٢٤٠٨)، ومسلم كتاب الأقضية: باب النهي عن كثرة المسائل من غير حاجة، رقم (١٧١٥) عن أبي هريرة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies