Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

If it is said: Suppose he covers it with soil—will his prayer be valid?

The answer is: if the soil is thick enough that he would not come into contact with the impurity when he presses down upon it, then the prayer is valid. But if it is thin enough that he would touch the impurity when he presses down upon it, then the prayer is invalid.

“If it is at the edge of a connected prayer mat, the prayer is valid, provided it does not move along with him when he walks …”

His statement, “If it is,” refers to the impurity.

His statement, “at the edge of a connected prayer mat, the prayer is valid,” may be illustrated by a man praying on a rug whose edge is impure. This edge is connected to the part upon which he is praying, but he neither directly touches nor comes into contact with the impurity. We therefore say that his prayer is valid.

His statement, “provided it does not move along with him when he walks,” is somewhat awkwardly worded. It does not fit with the preceding statement except by an implied qualification, because when he says, “if it is at the edge of a prayer mat,” a prayer mat does not move along when one walks; if you walk, it remains in its place. However, the author is alluding to another issue: when the impurity is connected to something attached to the worshipper. If it moves along with him when he walks, his prayer is invalid; but if it does not move along with him, his prayer is valid.

An example is a man holding a rope which he has tied around a donkey’s neck, either in his hand or around his waist. In this case, his prayer is valid, because if the donkey were to resist him, it would not be pulled along when he walks—this is generally the case. Thus, the prayer is valid, because the man is not carrying the impurity, the impurity is not following him, and he is not directly touching it. This is according to the view that a donkey is impure.

A second example is another man who ties a rope to his hand or around his waist, and ties its other end around the neck of a small dog. This man’s prayer is invalid, because when he walks, the dog is pulled along with him; he is therefore now causing the impurity to follow him.

فإن قيل: لو فرشَها تُراباً، فهل تصحُّ صلاته؟ فالجواب: إنْ كان كثيراً؛ بحيثُ لا يُلاقي النَّجاسة إذا كَبَسَ عليه؛ فالصَّلاةُ صحيحة، وإنْ كان قليلاً؛ بحيثُ يَمُسُّ النَّجاسةَ إذا كَبَسَ عليه؛ فالصَّلاةُ غيرُ صحيحة. وَإِنْ كَانَتْ بِطَرفِ مُصَلَّى مُتَّصلٍ صَحَّتْ إِنْ لَمْ يَنْجَرَّ بِمَشْيِهِ … قوله: «وإن كانت»، الضَّمير يعودُ على النجاسة. قوله: «بطرفِ مُصَلَّى مُتَّصلٍ صَحَّتْ»، مثاله: رجلٌ يُصلِّي على سَجَّادَة وطرفُها نَجِسٌ، وهذا الطَّرف متَّصلٌ بالذي يُصلِّي عليه، ولكنَّه لا يُباشر النَّجاسة، ولا يُلاقيها، فنقول: إنَّ صلاتَه صحيحةٌ. قوله: «إنْ لم يَنْجَرَّ بمشيه»، هذه العبارة فيها رَكَاكَة، فهي لا تَتَّفقُ مع الأُولى إلا على تقدير؛ لأن قوله: «وإنْ كان بطرفِ مُصَلَّى» فالمُصَلَّى لا ينجرُّ بالمشي، فلو مَشَيت فإنَّه يبقى في مكانه، ولكن يُشير المؤلِّف إلى مسألة أخرى، وهي إذا كانت النَّجاسة متَّصلة بشيءٍ مُتعلِّقٍ بالمُصلِّي، فإن كانت تنجرّ بمشيه لم تصحَّ صلاتُه، وإن كانت لا تنجرُّ صحَّت صلاتُه. مثال ذلك: رَجُل معه حبل، وربطه على رقبة حمار، وقد أمسكه بيده أو ربطه على بطنه، فهنا صلاتُه تصحُّ؛ لأنَّ الحِمَار لو استعصى عليه لم ينجرَّ إذا مشى، وهذا في الغالب، فالصَّلاة هنا صحيحة؛ لأنَّ الرَّجُلَ غير حامل للنَّجَاسة، ولا النَّجاسة تتبعه، وليس مباشراً لها، وهذا على القول بأنَّ الحِمَار نجسٌ. مثالٌ ثانٍ: رَجُلٌ آخر ربط حَبْلاً بيده أو ببطنه، وربطَ طرَفَهُ الآخر في رقبة كلب صغير، فهذا الرَّجُل صلاته لا تصحُّ؛ لأنَّه إذا مشى انجرَّ الكلب فهو مستتبع للنجاسة الآن.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies