Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Muslim (1). Thus, the man who prayed in an impure garment and did not become aware of the impurity until after he had finished is mistaken, not blameworthy. Had he known of the impurity, we would have said that he was blameworthy; but as matters stand, he made an unintentional mistake out of ignorance, so he is not required to repeat the prayer by virtue of this great verse, which is regarded as a foundational principle in the religion of Islam.

There is also evidence specific to this issue: when Gabriel informed the Messenger that there was something harmful or filthy on his sandals, he removed them (2) and continued his prayer. Had a garment whose impurity was unknown invalidated the prayer, he would have restarted it from the beginning.

As for forgetfulness—such as when one forgets that he has impurity on him, or forgets to wash it and then prays in the impure garment—the correct view is that he is not required to repeat the prayer.

The evidence is the saying of Allah, Most High:

“Our Lord, do not take us to task if we forget or make a mistake.” [al-Baqarah 2:286]

Another proof is what is authentically reported from Abu Hurayrah: the Prophet said, “Whoever forgets while fasting and eats or drinks should complete his fast.” (3) Eating and drinking while fasting are prohibited acts, and praying in an impure garment is likewise a prohibited act. Since its ruling is waived due to forgetfulness in the case of fasting, the same ruling concerning forgetfulness is extended by analogy to the case of prayer.

(1) Narrated by Muslim, Book of Faith, chapter: Clarification that He, glorified be He, has only imposed what is within one’s capacity, nos. 125 (126), on the authority of Abu Hurayrah and Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them. (2) Its authentication has previously been cited (p. 99). (3) Narrated by al-Bukhari, Book of Fasting, chapter: If a fasting person eats or drinks forgetfully, no. 1933; and Muslim, Book of Fasting, chapter: The forgetful person’s eating and drinking, no. 1155, on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, may Allah be pleased with him.
مسلم (١). إذاً؛ هذا الرَّجل الذي صَلَّى في ثوبٍ نجسٍ، وهو لا يدري بالنَّجاسة إلا بعد فراغه مخطئ لا خَاطئ، ولو كان يعلم بالنَّجاسة لقُلنا: إنه خاطئ، ولكن هو الآن مخطئ جاهل، فليس عليه إعادة بمقتضى هذه الآية العظيمة التي تُعتبر أساساً في الدِّين الإسلامي. وهناك دليل خاصٌّ بالمسألة، وهو أن الرَّسول ﷺ لما أخبره جبريلُ بأنَّ في نعليه أذى أو قَذَرٌ خلعهما (٢) واستمرَّ في صلاته، ولو كان الثَّوب النَّجس المجهول نجاسته تبطل به الصَّلاة لأعادها من أوَّلها. وأما النسيان: بأن نسيَ أن يكون عليه نجاسة، أو نسيَ أن يغسلها فَصَلَّى بالثوب النَّجس؛ فالصَّحيح أنه لا إعادة عليه. والدليل: قوله تعالى: ﴿رَبَّنَا لَا تُؤَاخِذْنَا إِنْ نَسِيْنَا أَوْ أَخْطَأْنَا﴾ [البقرة: ٢٨٦]. ودليل آخر: ما ثبت عن أبي هريرة ﵁، قال النبيُّ ﷺ: «مَنْ نسيَ وهو صائمٌ فأكلَ أو شربَ فليُتِمَّ صومَه» (٣). والأكل والشّرب في الصِّيام فعل محظور، والصَّلاةُ في ثوب نجس فِعْلٌ محظورٌ أيضاً. فلمَّا سقط حكمه بالنسيان في باب الصِّيام قِيْسَ عليه حُكمه بالنسيان في باب الصَّلاة.
(١) رواه مسلم، كتاب الإيمان: باب بيانه أنه سبحانه لم يكلف إلا ما يطاق، رقم (١٢٥) (١٢٦)، عن أبي هريرة ﵁، وابن عباس ﵄. (٢) تقدم تخريجه ص (٩٩). (٣) رواه البخاري، كتاب الصوم: باب الصائم إذا أكل أو شرب ناسياً، رقم (١٩٣٣)، ومسلم كتاب الصيام: باب أكل الناسي وشربه (١١٥٥) عن أبي هريرة ﵁.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies