Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

that prescribed punishments ought to be concealed: it is this man, whose actions warrant judgment against him, who has exposed himself; and carrying out the prescribed punishment upon him in public disseminates knowledge of his crime.

The need for one judge to write to another concerning matters that are the rights of Allah arises just as it does concerning the rights of human beings. The one who drank wine may be the judge’s cousin, and his drinking may have been established against him. The judge may be unable to sentence his cousin to flogging, or he may be able to issue the judgment but unable to enforce it. He would then refer the matter to a judge of greater standing and authority. Thus, the correct view is that held by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah: a judge’s letter to another judge is accepted in every matter in which a judge’s ruling may be enforced, whether involving the rights of Allah or the rights of His servants.

“A judge’s letter is accepted concerning a matter upon which he has ruled, so that the recipient may enforce it, even if they are in the same town. But it is not accepted concerning what has been established before him for the recipient to rule upon, unless the two are separated by a distance that permits the shortening of prayer. …”

His statement, “A judge’s letter is accepted concerning a matter upon which he has ruled, so that the recipient may enforce it, even if they are in the same town. But it is not accepted concerning what has been established before him for the recipient to rule upon, unless the two are separated by a distance that permits the shortening of prayer”: We previously mentioned that a judge’s letter to another judge takes two forms:

The first is that he writes concerning what has been established before him, so that the judge to whom the letter is addressed may rule accordingly.

The second is that he writes concerning a matter upon which he has ruled, so that it may be enforced.

Thus, for a letter concerning what has been established before him, so that the judge to whom it is addressed may rule accordingly, it is stipulated that there be, between the writing judge and the addressee, a distance

بأن الحدود ينبغي فيها الستر: أن هذا الرجل الذي فعل ما يقتضي الحكم عليه هو الذي فضح نفسه، وإقامة الحد عليه أمام الناس فيه نشر لجريمته. والحاجة إلى كتابة القاضي إلى القاضي فيما هو من حقوق الله واقعة، كما هي في حقوق الآدميين، وقد يكون هذا الذي شرب الخمر ابن عم للقاضي، وثبت عليه شرب الخمر، ولا يستطيع أن يحكم هو على ابن عمه بالجلد، أو يستطيع أن يحكم لكن لا يستطيع أن ينفذ، فيرفع الأمر إلى قاضٍ أقوى منه مركزاً وسلطة، فالصواب ما ذهب إليه شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية أن كتاب القاضي إلى القاضي مقبول في كل ما ينفذ فيه حكم القاضي من الحقوق التي لله، والتي لعباد الله. وَيُقْبَلُ فِيمَا حَكَمَ بِهِ لِيُنَفِّذَهُ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِي بَلَدٍ وَاحِدٍ، وَلَا يُقْبَلُ فِيمَا ثَبَتَ عِنْدَهُ لِيَحْكُمَ بِهِ، إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ بَيْنَهُما مَسَافَةُ قَصْرٍ، ............. قوله: «ويقبل فيما حكم به لينفذه وإن كان في بلد واحد، ولا يقبل فيما ثبت عنده ليحكم به إلا أن يكون بينهما مسافة القصر» ذكرنا فيما سبق أن كتاب القاضي إلى القاضي له صورتان: الأولى: أن يكتب فيما ثبت عنده ليحكم به القاضي المكتوب إليه. الثانية: أن يكتب فيما حكم به لينفذه. فيشترط في الكتابة فيما ثبت عنده ليحكم به القاضي المكتوب إليه، أن يكون بين القاضي الكاتب والمكتوب إليه مسافة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies