Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Chapter: A Judge’s Letter to Another Judge

His statement, “A judge’s letter to another judge,” means a letter from one judge to another concerning judicial matters. In the terminology of later scholars, this is called delegation: that is, the judge writing the letter appoints the judge to whom it is addressed as his deputy, just as the imam in prayer appoints someone to complete the prayer in his place. It takes two forms:

The first is that he writes to another judge regarding what has been established before him, so that the judge to whom the letter is addressed may rule accordingly.

The second is that he writes to another judge regarding a judgment he has issued, so that the recipient judge may enforce it.

Usually, there is no need for this, unless, for example, the property being claimed is real estate located in the town of the judge to whom the letter is addressed. In that case, the judge may need to do so. Or one of the litigating parties may be in the town of the recipient judge; the claimant’s case is then established before the first judge, who rules that it has been established and writes to the other judge so that he may rule accordingly.

If someone were to ask: What benefit is there in occupying the writing judge with drafting the letter? Why not refer the parties to the recipient judge from the outset, before the ruling is established?

We reply: The benefit is that the judge to whom the letter is addressed may be busier.

بَابُ كِتَابِ الْقَاضِي إِلَى الْقَاضِي ................................................. قوله: «كتاب القاضي إلى القاضي» أي: كتاب القاضي إلى القاضي فيما يتعلق بالقضاء، وتسمى في عرف المتأخرين استخلافاً، يعني أن القاضي الكاتب استخلف القاضي المكتوب إليه، كما يستخلف الإمام في الصلاة من يتم الصلاة بدلاً عنه، وله صورتان: الأولى: أن يكتب إلى القاضي فيما ثبت عنده ليحكم به القاضي المكتوب إليه. الثانية: أن يكتب إلى القاضي فيما حكم به لينفذه المكتوب إليه. وهذا في الغالب لا تدعو الحاجة إليه، إلا إذا كانت العين المدعى بها عقاراً، وكانت في بلد المكتوب إليه مثلاً، فإن القاضي قد يحتاج إلى ذلك، أو يكون أحد المدعيين في بلد القاضي المكتوب إليه، فيثبت عند القاضي دعوى المدعي، ويحكم بالثبوت إلى القاضي الآخر ليحكم بذلك. فإذا قال قائل: ما فائدة شَغْل القاضي الكاتب بالكتابة؟ لماذا لا نقول: حولهم على المكتوب إليه من الأصل، قبل أن تثبت الحكم. نقول: الفائدة أنه قد يكون القاضي المكتوب إليه أكثر عملاً

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies