Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

First: justice in the ruling—that he judges according to what Allah’s Law requires, for everything required by Allah’s Law is undoubtedly just. Accordingly, he must reject and set aside every legal ruling that contravenes Allah’s Law, regardless of how authoritative it may be, for the judge is obliged to reject and discard it, since it is contrary to justice. Everything that contradicts the Law of Allah is contrary to justice.

Second: justice with regard to the person being judged—that he makes no distinction between young and old, noble and lowly, rich and poor, relative and stranger. It will come, if Allah Most High wills, that he must treat the two litigants equally in the attention he gives them, his speech to them, their seating before him, and their entry into his presence. Thus, the judge must not be one who, when a case concerning one of his relatives is brought before him, seeks to evade ruling against him; nor one who, when a case concerning someone with whom he has a personal enmity is brought before him, seeks to rule against him.

When the case of the Makhzūmī woman, who used to borrow goods and then deny having taken them, was brought before our Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, he ordered that her hand be cut off. The Makhzūmī woman belonged to Banū Makhzūm, one of the noble clans of Quraysh. Her case greatly troubled Quraysh, and they said, “How can the hand of a woman from Banū Makhzūm be cut off, leaving her disgraced before the people?!” They sought someone who could intercede with the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and eventually agreed to send Usāmah ibn Zayd. He undertook this and asked the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, to waive the punishment in her case. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said to him, “Do you intercede concerning one of Allah’s prescribed punishments?!”

The interrogative here is one of condemnation. Thus, he condemned him and pointed out the reason: he condemned him in his words, “Do you intercede?” and pointed out the reason in his words, “concerning one of Allah’s prescribed punishments?” It is as though he were saying: I do not have the authority to alter any of Allah’s prescribed punishments. Therefore, there can be no intercession concerning one of Allah’s prescribed punishments, for all judgment belongs to Allah, Exalted is He,

أولاً: العدل في الحكم بأن يحكم بما تقتضيه شريعة الله؛ لأن كل ما تقتضيه شريعة الله فهو عدل بلا شك، وبناء على ذلك يرفض جميع الأحكام القانونية التي تخالف شريعة الله، مهما كانت قوتها، فإنه يجب على القاضي رفضها وطرحها؛ لأنه خلاف العدل، فكل ما خالف شرع الله فإنه خلاف العدل. ثانياً: العدل في المحكوم عليه، بأن لا يفرق بين صغير وكبير، وشريف ووضيع، وغني وفقير، وقريب وبعيد، وسيأتينا ـ إن شاء الله تعالى ـ بيان أنه يجب أن يعدل بين الخصمين في لحظه، ولفظه، ومجلسه، ودخولهما عليه، فلا يكون القاضي ممن إذا رفعت إليه قضية تتعلق بأحد من أقاربه حاول أن يتخلص من الحكم عليه، وإذا رفعت إليه قضية تتعلق بأحد ممن بينه وبينهم عداوة شخصية حاول أن يحكم بها عليه، فإن نبينا محمداً ﷺ حين رفع إليه أمر المخزومية التي كانت تستعير المتاع وتجحده، أمر بقطع يدها، والمخزومية من بني مخزوم من أشراف قريش، فأَهَمَّ قريشاً شأنها، وقالوا: كيف تقطع يد امرأة من بني مخزوم، وتصبح أمام الناس عاراً؟! فطلبوا من يشفع إلى النبي ﷺ، فاستقر رأيهم على ندب أسامة بن زيد، فانتدب لذلك وطلب من النبي ﷺ أن يرفع الحكم عنها، فقال له النبي ﷺ: «أتشفع في حد من حدود الله»؟! والاستفهام هنا للإنكار، فأنكر، وأشار إلى العلة، أنكر في قوله: «أتشفع؟»، وأشار إلى العلة في قوله: «في حد من حدود الله»، كأنه يقول: أنا لا أملك أن أغير حدّاً من حدود الله، فلا شفاعة في حد من حدود الله؛ لأن الحكم كله لله ﷿،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies