Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The author then defined breaking an oath in its technical sense, saying: “by doing what one swore to refrain from doing, or by refraining from what one swore to do.” For example, a person says, “By Allah, I will never wear this garment,” then later wears it; he has broken his oath, because he did what he had sworn not to do. Or he says, “By Allah, I will wear this garment today,” then the day ends without his wearing it; he has broken his oath, because he refrained from what he had sworn to do.

But when can we establish that a man has broken his oath?

We say: if he has stipulated a time, then it occurs upon the expiry of that time. For example, if he says, “By Allah, I will wear this garment today,” and the sun sets before he wears it, he must offer expiation because he has broken his oath. But if he states it without specifying a time, we cannot know that he has broken his oath until the garment is torn and ruined, or until the man dies, since he did not set a time limit. This is why, when Umar said to the Prophet, “Did you not tell us that we would come to the House and circumambulate it?” the Prophet said, “Did I say: this year?” He replied, “No.” He said, “Then you will indeed come to it and circumambulate it.” (1) He said this at the Treaty of al-Hudaybiyyah, a year before Umar came to it.

His statement, “voluntarily”: its opposite is under compulsion. If a person breaks his oath under compulsion, then no expiation is due from him. For instance, a son says, “By Allah, I will not wear this garment,” and his father says, “You will wear it, or else I shall do such-and-such,” threatening him; so the son wears it. In this case, nothing is due from him, because he was compelled. The evidence for this is the proofs mentioned previously.

His statement, “knowingly”: its opposite is forgetfully. For example, one says, “By Allah, I will not read this book today,” then forgets and reads it. Nothing is due from him, because he

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari in Kitab al-Shurut (Conditions), chapter: “Conditions in jihad, making peace with the people of war, and recording conditions” (2734), on the authority of al-Miswar ibn Makhramah.
وفسر المؤلف الحنث اصطلاحاً فقال: «بأن يفعل ما حلف على تركه، أو يترك ما حلف على فعله» مثاله: يقول: والله لا ألبس هذا الثوب أبداً، ثم لبسه بعد ذلك، فقد حنث؛ لأنه فعل ما حلف على تركه، أو قال: والله لألبسن هذا الثوب اليوم، ثم انقضى اليوم ولم يلبسه فقد حنث؛ لأنه ترك ما حلف على فعله. لكن متى نتحقق أن الرجل حنث في يمينه؟ نقول: إن قيده بزمن فبانتهائه، مثل أن يقول: والله لألبسنَّ اليوم هذا الثوب، فغابت الشمس ولم يلبسه لزمته كفارة؛ لأنه حنث، أمَّا إذا أطلق فإننا لا نعلم أنه يحنث حتى يتقطع الثوب ويتلف، أو يموت الرجل لأنه لم يقيده بزمن، ولهذا لمّا قال عمر ﵁ للنبي ﷺ: ألم تحدثنا أنا نأتي البيت، ونطوف به؟ قال ﷺ: «أقلت: هذا العام؟» قال: لا، قال: «فإنك آتيه ومطوف به» (١)، وقال ذلك في صلح الحديبية قبل أن يأتيه بسنة. قوله: «مختاراً» ضده المكره، فإن حنث مكرهاً فلا كفارة عليه، كأن يقول الولد: والله لا ألبس هذا الثوب، فقال الوالد: لتلبسنَّه، وإلاّ فعلتُ، وفعلتُ، وهدَّدَه، فلبسه الولد، فهنا لا شيء عليه؛ لأنه مكره والدليل ما سبق من الأدلة. قوله: «ذاكراً» وضده الناسي، مثل قوله: والله لا أطالع في هذا الكتاب اليوم، ثم نسي وطالع فيه، فليس عليه شيء؛ لأنه
(١) أخرجه البخاري في الشروط/ باب الشروط في الجهاد والمصالحة مع أهل الحرب وكتابة الشروط (٢٧٣٤) عن المسور بن مخرمة ﵁.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies