Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

two types of carrion and two types of blood: as for the two types of carrion, they are locusts and fish.” (1) This is narrated from Ibn Umar as a statement of his own, and it is also traced back to the Prophet ﷺ through a weak chain. Yet even if it were only a statement of Ibn Umar, it carries the ruling of a report traced back to the Prophet, because this form of expression from a Companion is treated as such.

Second, in terms of its underlying rationale and wisdom: locusts contain no blood that needs to be drained. Hence the Prophet ﷺ said: “Eat whatever has had its blood drained and over which Allah’s name has been mentioned.” (2)

Some scholars have said that it must die through some human act; if it dies without any human intervention, it is not lawful. However, this is a weak view.

His statement, “and fish”: fish live in water. Thus, his statement, “and everything that lives only in water,” is an instance of joining the general category to the specific. Everything that can live only in water is lawful without ritual slaughter. The evidence from the Quran is Allah’s statement:

“Lawful to you is the catch of the sea and its food, as provision for you and for the travelers.” [Surah al-Ma'idah 5:96]

The evidence from the sunnah is found in the lengthy hadith of Abu Ubaydah: the Prophet ﷺ sent them on a military expedition and gave them dates. Their supply of dates ran out, and they became hungry, until

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari in The Book of Partnership, chapter: “The Division of Booty” (2488), and by Muslim in The Book of Sacrifices, chapter: “The Permissibility of Slaughtering with Anything That Causes Blood to Flow” (1968), on the authority of Rafi ibn Khadij, may Allah be pleased with him. (2) Narrated by al-Bukhari in The Book of Military Expeditions, chapter: “The Expedition of Sayf al-Bahr, When They Went to Meet a Caravan …” (4361), and by Muslim in The Book of Hunting and Slaughter, chapter: “The Permissibility of Sea Carrion” (1935), on the authority of Jabir ibn Abd Allah, may Allah be pleased with them both.
ميتتان ودمان، فأما الميتتان فالجراد والحوت» (١)، وهذا يروى من حديث ابن عمر موقوفاً عليه، ومرفوعاً بسندٍ ضعيف، لكن حتى لو كان موقوفاً عليه فله حكم الرفع؛ لأن هذه الصيغة من الصحابي يحكم لها بالرفع. ثانياً: من حيث التعليل والحكمة فالجراد ليس فيه دم حتى يحتاج إلى إنهاره؛ ولهذا قال النبي ﷺ: «ما أنهر الدم وذُكر اسم الله عليه فكُلْ» (٢). وقال بعض العلماء: لا بد أن يموت بسبب من الإنسان، ولو مات بدون سببٍ من الإنسان فإنه لا يحل، لكنه قول ضعيف. قوله: «والسمك» السمك يعيش في الماء، وعلى هذا فقوله: «وكل ما لا يعيش إلا في الماء» من باب عطف العامّ على الخاص، فكل شيء لا يعيش إلا في الماء فإنه يحل بدون ذكاة، والدليل من القرآن قوله تعالى: ﴿أُحِلَّ لَكُمْ صَيْدُ الْبَحْرِ وَطَعَامُهُ مَتَاعًا لَكُمْ وَلِلسَّيَّارَةِ﴾ [المائدة: ٩٦]. ومن السنة ما في حديث أبي عبيدة الطويل الذين بعثهم النبي ﷺ في سرية، وأعطاهم تمراً، ونفد التمر، وجاعوا، حتى
(١) أخرجه البخاري في الشركة/ باب قسمة الغنائم (٢٤٨٨)، ومسلم في الأضاحي/ باب جواز الذبح بكل ما أنهر الدم (١٩٦٨) عن رافع بن خديج ﵁. (٢) أخرجه البخاري في المغازي/ باب غزوة سيف البحر وهم يتلقون عيراً … (٤٣٦١)، ومسلم في الصيد والذبائح/ باب إباحة ميتات البحر (١٩٣٥) عن جابر بن عبد الله ﵄.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies