Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

the ruling is contingent upon intoxication; and since there is no intoxication here, there is no prohibition.

Question: What is the ruling on hashish?

Answer: Shaykh al-Islam—may Allah have mercy on him—regarded hashish as more vile than wine, and it is indeed so. Hashish intoxicates, and it is worse than wine because it affects the brain more severely than wine does. The same appears to apply to narcotic pills as well, for their harm is immense and greater than that of wine. In some non-Muslim countries, those who traffic them are sentenced to death. Yet they are not termed wine; rather, their punishment is subject to discretionary punishment, left to the ruler’s judgement.

“If a Muslim drinks it willingly, knowing that a large amount of it intoxicates, then he is subject to the prescribed punishment: eighty lashes if free, and forty if enslaved.”

His statement, “If a Muslim drinks it”: this is the first condition, excluding one who is not Muslim. Even if he is a protected non-Muslim resident, he is not subject to the prescribed punishment, because it is the Muslim who believes it to be prohibited. As for non-Muslims, they do not believe it to be prohibited. Therefore, the prescribed punishment is not carried out on them if they drink wine, though they are prevented from openly displaying it in Muslim lands.

His statement, “willingly”: this is the second condition. If he is compelled, then there is no prescribed punishment upon him, due to Allah’s saying concerning disbelief—which is the gravest of sins:

“Whoever disbelieves in Allah after having believed—except one who is compelled while his heart remains secure in faith—but whoever opens his breast to disbelief: upon them is wrath from Allah, and for them is a tremendous punishment.” [al-Nahl 16:106]

However, a person compelled to commit a sin may sometimes commit it in order to avert the compulsion, and at other times commit it for its own sake. Is the verse general in application, as are the rulings in general? Or is it specific to one who commits the act in order to avert the compulsion?

Answer: The scholars differed regarding this. Some of them said that

الحكم معلقاً بالإسكار، وهنا لا إسكار فلا تحريم. مسألة: ما حكم الحشيش؟ الجواب: الحشيش يراه شيخ الإسلام ﵀ أخبث من الخمر، وهو كذلك، فإن الحشيشة تسكر، وهي شر منه؛ لأنها تؤثر على المخ أكثر مما يؤثر الخمر، ومثل ذلك ـ أيضاً ـ فيما يظهر الحبوب المخدرة؛ لأن مضرتها عظيمة، وهي أشد من مضرة الخمر، وفي بعض الدول غير الإسلامية يوجبون القتل على مروِّجها، ولكنها لا تسمى خمراً، وفيها التعزير، ويرجع فيه إلى اجتهاد الإمام. ، وَإِذَا شَرِبَهُ الْمُسْلِمُ مُخْتَاراً عَالِماً أَنَّ كَثِيرَهُ يُسْكِرُ فَعَلَيْهِ الْحَدُّ، ثَمَانُونَ جَلْدَةً مَعَ الْحُرِّيَّةِ، وَأَرْبَعُونَ مَعَ الرِّقِّ. قوله: «وَإَذا شَرِبَهُ المُسْلِمُ» هذا الشرط الأول، وخرج به من ليس بمسلم، حتى وإن كان ملتزماً كالذمي فإنه لا يحد؛ لأن المسلم هو الذي يعتقد تحريمه، أما غير المسلم فهم لا يعتقدون تحريمه؛ ولهذا لا يقام عليهم الحد إذا شربوا الخمر، ولكنهم يمنعون من إظهاره في بلاد المسلمين. قوله: «مُخْتَاراً» هذا الشرط الثاني، فإن كان مكرهاً فإنه لا حد عليه؛ لقوله تعالى في الكفر، وهو أعظم الذنوب: ﴿مَنْ كَفَرَ بِاللَّهِ مِنْ بَعْدِ إِيمَانِهِ إِلاَّ مَنْ أُكْرِهَ وَقَلْبُهُ مُطْمَئِنٌّ بِالإِيمَانِ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ شَرَحَ بِالْكُفْرِ صَدْرًا فَعَلَيْهِمْ غَضَبٌ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ﴾ [النحل:١٠٦]، ولكن المكره على فعل المعصية، تارة يفعلها لدفع الإكراه، وتارة يفعلها لذاتها، فهل الآية عامة والأحكام عامة؟ أو خاصة بمن فعله لدفع الإكراه؟ الجواب: اختلف في هذا أهل العلم؛ فمنهم من قال: إنه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies