Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

“Is Ma'iz mad?” They replied, “No; he is one of our upright men and is sound of mind.” He then asked, “Have you drunk wine?” He replied, “No.” Indeed, he ordered a man to smell his breath (1), that is, to detect its odour. This indicates that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, had some doubt concerning this man’s confession and wished to verify it.

This is further supported by the account of the hired labourer, in which there is only his saying: “If she confesses, then stone her” (2). An unrestricted verb is fulfilled by a single instance. Likewise, in the case of the two Jews who committed fornication, the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, ordered that they be stoned (3), without it being mentioned that they repeated their confession. Similarly, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, ordered the Ghamidi woman to be stoned, without it being mentioned that she repeated her confession. Indeed, she said, “O Messenger of Allah, do you wish to turn me away as you turned Ma'iz away?” (4).

This view—that repeating the confession four times is not a condition—is more preponderant, particularly when the matter has become widely known, as in the case of the hired labourer. That case had become public, because the labourer’s father went about asking people what was due from his son. He was told, “Your son owes one hundred sheep and a slave-girl,” so he secured his son’s release by paying that ransom. Then the dispute came before the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, and he judged between them according to the Book of Allah.

There are two opinions on this issue:

The first is that it is a condition.

The second is that repetition is not required in a confession.

However, both opinions agree that if the judge has cause for doubt, he is obliged to ascertain and verify the matter.

(1) Its source reference has been given previously on p. 231. (2) Its source reference has been given previously on p. 225. (3) Its source reference has been given previously on p. 212. (4) Its source reference has been given previously on p. 51.
«هل ماعز فيه جنون؟»، قالوا: لا، إنه من صالِح رجالنا في العقل، ثم قال: «هل شربتَ الخمر؟»، فقال: لا، حتى إنه أمر رجلاً أن يستنكهه (١)، أي: يشم رائحته، وهذا يدل على أن الرسول ﷺ كان عنده بعض الشك في إقرار هذا الرجل، وأراد أن يستثبت، ويؤيد هذا أن قصة العسيف ليس فيها إلا أنه قال: «إن اعترفت فارجمها» (٢)، والفعل المطلق يصدق بالواحد، وكذلك قصة اليهوديين اللَّذَيْنِ زنيا، فإن الرسول ﷺ أمر برجمهما (٣) ولم يذكر أنهما كرَّرا الإقرار، وكذلك الغامدية أمر النبي ﷺ برجمها ولم يذكر أنها كرَّرت الإقرار، حتى إنها قالت: يا رسول الله، تريد أن تُرَدِّدَنِي كما رددت ماعزاً؟! (٤). وهذا القول أرجح أن تكرار الإقرار أربعاً ليس بشرط، لا سيما إذا كان الأمر قد اشتهر كما في قصة العسيف؛ لأن هذه القصة قد اشتهرت؛ لأن أبا العسيف ذهب يسأل الناس ما الذي عليه؟ فقيل له: إن على ابنك مائة شاة ووليدة، فافتداه بذلك حتى حصلت المخاصمة إلى الرسول ﵊، وقضى بينهما بكتاب الله، فعندنا قولان في المسألة: الأول: أنه شرط. الثاني: أنه لا يشترط التكرار في الإقرار. ولكن القولين يتفقان في أنه إذا قام عند الحاكم شبهة، فإن الواجب التأكد والاستثبات.
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (٢٣١). (٢) سبق تخريجه ص (٢٢٥). (٣) سبق تخريجه ص (٢١٢). (٤) سبق تخريجه ص (٥١).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies