Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Some atheists and heretics say: “If we were to cut off the thief’s hand, half the population would end up with their hands cut off.” We say: If one hand were cut off, thousands would be deterred, and there would be no theft. But the son of Adam, because of his limited vision, looks only at the present and does not look to the future.

Allah, Exalted is He, says regarding highway robbers: “Indeed, the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to spread corruption throughout the land is that they be killed, or crucified, or have their hands and feet cut off on opposite sides” [al-Ma'idah 5:33]. The word “indeed” is a restrictive particle, meaning that their recompense is nothing but this.

While delivering a sermon to the people from the pulpit of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “I fear that, as time passes, people will say, ‘We do not find stoning in the Book of Allah,’ and thus go astray by abandoning an obligation that Allah revealed” (1). The people did not object to him at all; rather, they affirmed it, because it is one of Allah’s obligations that must be carried out.

If a noble, honourable, upright person from a good family is tempted by his own soul to steal a quarter of a dinar, and this is established against him, then the prescribed punishment must be carried out against him. It is carried out against the noble and the lowly, the rich and the poor, the male and the female, the free person and the slave—there is no distinction—because Allah, Mighty and Majestic, made no distinction. So long as he has stolen, this is his recompense. Indeed, if someone were to say: “Were it not that Allah had prescribed a hadd punishment, we would say that this noble man’s hand and foot should be cut off, because he is noble; for his defilement through theft is graver than”

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari in Kitab al-Hudud (Prescribed Punishments), chapter: Confession to zina (unlawful sexual intercourse), no. 1829; and by Muslim in Kitab al-Hudud, chapter: Stoning of the previously married person for zina, no. 1691, on the authority of Ibn Abbas.
يقول بعض الملحدين والزنادقة: إننا لو قطعنا يد السارق لأصبح نصف الشعب مقطوعاً، نقول: لو قطع واحد لارتدع الآلاف، ولَمَا كان هناك سرقة، لكن ابن آدم ـ لقصور نظره ـ ينظر إلى الحاضر، ولا ينظر إلى المستقبل. وقال تعالى في قطاع الطريق: ﴿إِنَّمَا جَزَاءُ الَّذِينَ يُحَارِبُونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَيَسْعَوْنَ فِي الأَرْضِ فَسَادًا أَنْ يُقَتَّلُوا أَوْ يُصَلَّبُوا أَوْ تُقَطَّعَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَأَرْجُلُهُمْ مِنْ خِلَافٍ﴾ [المائدة: ٣٣] «إنما» أداة حصر، يعني ما جزاؤهم إلا هذا. وقال عمر ﵁ وهو يخطب الناس على منبر الرسول الله ﵊: «وإني أخشى إن طال بالناس زمان أن يقولوا: لا نجد الرجم في كتاب الله، فيضلوا بترك فريضة أنزلها الله» (١)، وما أنكر عليه الناس أبداً بل أقروه؛ لأنها فريضة من فرائض الله يجب أن تنفذ. ولو أن إنساناً كريماً، وشريفاً، وطيباً، ومن عائلة طيبة، سوَّلت له نفسه أن يسرق ربع دينار، وثبت عليه ذلك، فالواجب أن يقام عليه الحد، فيقام الحد على الشريف، وعلى الوضيع، وعلى الغني، والفقير، والذكر، والأنثى، والحر، والعبد، لا فرق؛ لأن الله ﷿ لم يفرق، فما دام سرق فهذا جزاؤه؛ بل لو قال قائل: إن سرقة هذا الشريف لولا أن الله حدَّ حداً، لقلنا: تقطع يده ورجله؛ لأنه شريف، فتدنُّسُهُ بالسرقة أعظم من
(١) أخرجه البخاري في الحدود باب الاعتراف بالزنا (١٨٢٩)، ومسلم في الحدود باب رجم الثيب في الزنا (١٦٩١) عن ابن عباس ﵄.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies