Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

of the general instruction to repeat after him (1), and because it is a remembrance whose occasion arises during the prayer, it is therefore legislated—just as when a person praying sneezes, he praises Allah, as established in the sunnah.

It may be said, however, that there is a difference between the two: the praise uttered by one who sneezes does not greatly distract from the remembrances of the prayer, unlike repeating after the caller to prayer. It may also occur while one is reciting al-Fātiḥah, thereby interrupting the continuity of its recitation. The stronger view, therefore, is that one praying should not repeat after the caller to prayer; nor should one relieving himself.

But should they make it up afterward or not? The well-known position of the school is that they should make it up (2), because the cause arose while the impediment was present; once the impediment ceases, it is removed, and they make up what they missed. Yet there is some reservation concerning this, particularly when a long interval has passed. And Allah knows best.

His hawqalah during the hay'alah

His statement, “and his hawqalah during the hay'alah”: these are two coined and contracted verbal nouns. Hawqalah is formed from the words, “There is no power nor strength except through Allah,” while hay'alah is formed from, “Come to prayer” and “Come to success.” Thus, when the caller to prayer says, “Come to prayer,” you say, “There is no power nor strength except through Allah”; and when he says, “Come to success,” you say, “There is no power nor strength except through Allah.”

If someone were to ask: “Have I been afflicted by a calamity, that I should say, ‘There is no power nor strength except through Allah’?” For ordinary people commonly say, when afflicted by a calamity, “There is no power nor strength except through Allah.” What is prescribed upon calamities is to say, “Indeed, to Allah we belong, and to Him we shall return.” As for this phrase, “There is no power

(1) See: al-Ikhtiyarat, p. 39. (2) See: al-Insaf, 1:191; 3:108; al-Iqna, 1:123.
الأمر بالمتابعة (١)، ولأنه ذِكْرٌ وُجِدَ سببُه في الصَّلاة، فكان مشروعاً، كما لو عَطَسَ المصلِّي فإنه يحمد الله كما جاءت به السُّنَّة. لكن قد يقال: إن بينهما فَرْقاً، فإن حَمْدَ العاطس لا يُشْغِلُ كثيراً عن أذكار الصَّلاة، بخلاف متابعة المؤذِّن، وربما يكون ذلك أثناء قراءة الفاتحة فتفوت الموالاة بينها، فالرَّاجح أن المصلِّي لا يتابع المؤذِّن، وكذا قاضي الحاجة. لكن هل يقضيان أم لا؟ المشهور من المذهب أنهما يقضيان (٢)؛ لأن السبب وُجِدَ حال وجود المانع؛ فإذا زال المانع ارتفع وقضى ما فاته. وفي النَّفس من هذا شيء، خصوصاً إذا طال الفصلُ والله أعلم. وَحَوْقَلَتُهُ فِي الحَيْعَلَة. قوله: «وحَوقَلَتُه في الحَيْعَلة»، هذان مصدران مصنوعان ومنحوتان؛ لأنَّ الحَوقَلَة مصنوعة من «لا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا بالله»، والحيعلة من «حيَّ على الصَّلاة» «حيّ على الفلاح»، فتقول إذا قال المؤذِّنُ: «حَيَّ على الصَّلاة»: لا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا بالله، وإذا قال: «حَيَّ على الفلاح»: لا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا بالله. لو قال قائل: هل ابتُليتُ بمصيبة حتى أقول: لا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا بالله؟ لأنَّ العامَّة عندهم أن الإنسان إذا أُصيب بمصيبة قال: «لا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا بالله». والمشروع عند المصائب أن تقول: «إنَّا لله، وإنَّا إليه راجعون»، أما هذه الكلمة: «لا حول
(١) انظر: «الاختيارات» ص (٣٩). (٢) انظر: «الإنصاف» (١/ ١٩١)، (٣/ ١٠٨)، «الإقناع» (١/ ١٢٣).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies