Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

and set her free. This is possible. Yet, in the view of those who hold that an expiation cannot be divided, it is not possible, because the reality is that each of them has freed only half a slave, while each is a participant in the killing.

Thus, according to the established school, if a person participates even to the extent of one part in a hundred, he must offer an expiation. Hence, if one hundred people join in killing a person, they are each liable for an expiation—one hundred expiations in all.

There is another opinion reported from the companions of Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him: that they share one expiation.

In reality, it may be argued that this view is feasible with respect to manumission, but not with respect to fasting. For if one fasts a month and the other fasts a month, neither of them has fasted the two months required as expiation for killing.

As for manumission, one might argue that it is founded upon freeing a person and depends more upon wealth, unlike fasting, which is a purely physical act of worship.

In any case, the cautious position in this matter is that of the established school: each person is liable for an expiation, even if the participants are numerous.

The expiation is to free a slave; whoever cannot find one must fast for two consecutive months. Its evidence is the saying of Allah, Most High:

“It is not for a believer to kill a believer except by mistake. Whoever kills a believer by mistake must free a believing slave and pay blood-money to the family of the deceased, unless they remit it as charity. If the deceased was a believer from a people hostile to you, then the expiation is the freeing of a believing slave. And if he was from a people with whom you have a treaty, then blood-money must be paid to his family, along with the freeing of a believing slave. Whoever cannot find one must fast for two consecutive months, as repentance from Allah. And Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” [al-Nisa' 4:92]

وهذا ممكن، ولكنه في نظر من قال: إن الكفارة لا تتبعض يقول: هذا غير ممكن؛ لأن حقيقة الأمر أن كل واحد منهما أعتق نصف رقبة فقط، وكل واحد منهما قاتِل بالمشاركة. فالمذهب: أنه إذا شارك ولو في جزء واحد من مائة جزء فعليه كفارة، ولهذا لو اجتمع مائة على قتل شخص فعليهم مائة كفارة، على كل واحد كفارة. وهناك وجه آخر لأصحاب الإمام أحمد ﵀ أنهم يشتركون في الكفارة. وهذا القول في الحقيقة بالنسبة للعتق قد يقال: إنه ممكن، ولكن بالنسبة للصيام فغير ممكن؛ لأنه إذا صام شهراً، والآخر شهراً، لم يكن كل واحد منهما صام شهرين كفارة القتل. وأما العتق فقد يقول قائل: إن مبناه على التحرير، ويعتمد على المال أكثر، بخلاف الصوم فهو عبادة بدنية محضة. وعلى كل حال الاحتياط هو المذهب في هذه المسألة، وأنه يلزم كل واحد كفارة، ولو كثر المشتركون. والكفارة عتق رقبة، فمن لم يجد فصيام شهرين متتابعين، ودليلها قول الله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ أَنْ يَقْتُلَ مُؤْمِناً إِلاَّ خَطَأً وَمَنْ قَتَلَ مُؤْمِناً خَطَأً فَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُؤْمِنَةٍ وَدِيَةٌ مُسَلَّمَةٌ إِلَى أَهْلِهِ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَصَّدَّقُوا فَإِنْ كَانَ مِنْ قَوْمٍ عَدُوٍّ لَكُمْ وَهُوَ مُؤْمِنٌ فَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُؤْمِنَةٍ وَإِنْ كَانَ مِنْ قَوْمٍ بَيْنَكُمْ وَبَيْنَهُمْ مِيثَاقٌ فَدِيَةٌ مُسَلَّمَةٌ إِلَى أَهْلِهِ وَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُؤْمِنَةٍ فَمَنْ لَمْ يَجِدْ فَصِيَامُ شَهْرَيْنِ مُتَتَابِعَيْنِ تَوْبَةً مِنَ اللَّهِ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ عَلِيمًا حَكِيمًا *﴾ [النساء:٩٢].

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies