Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Our scholars said that he should not respond (1), because this adhan is not directed to him, and so he does not repeat it. They answered the hadith by saying that the customary practice in the Prophet’s time was for there to be only one caller to prayer, and it would not have been possible for another to give the adhan after the prayer had been performed. Thus, the hadith is to be understood according to what was customary in the Prophet’s time: the adhan was not repeated. Yet if someone were to apply the hadith in its general sense and say, “It is a form of remembrance, and since the hadith is general, there is nothing to prevent me from remembering Allah, Mighty and Majestic is He,” then there is no objection.

His statement, “It is recommended for the one who hears it to repeat it quietly,” clearly indicates that if he deliberately omits the response, he incurs no sin. This is the correct view. Some of the Zahiris held that repeating after the caller to prayer is obligatory, and that whoever hears him must say what he says (2).

They cited the command: “When you hear the caller to prayer, say what he says.” The basic principle concerning a command is that it denotes obligation, but the majority held otherwise (3).

The majority cited as evidence that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, heard a caller to prayer giving the adhan and said, “Upon the natural disposition” (4). It has not been reported that he responded to him or repeated after him. Had repeating after the caller been obligatory, the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, would have done so, and it would have been transmitted to us.

(1) See: al-Insaf, 3:107; Kashshaf al-Qina, 1:245. (2) See: al-Muhalla, 3:148. (3) See: al-Mughni, 2:85; al-Nukat ala al-Muharrar, 1:38–39. (4) Narrated by Muslim; its source documentation has preceded (p. 47), from the hadith of Anas ibn Malik. In my view, there is clearer evidence than this: the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said to Malik ibn al-Huwayrith and those with him: “When the time for prayer comes…”
وقال الأصحاب: إنه لا يجيب (١)؛ لأنه غير مدعو بهذا الأذان فلا يتابعه. وأجابوا عن الحديث: بأن المعروف في عهد النبيِّ ﷺ أن المؤذِّنَ واحد، ولا يمكن أن يؤذِّن آخر بعد أن تُؤدَّى الصَّلاة، فيُحمل الحديث على المعهود في عهد النبيِّ ﷺ، وأنه لا تكرار في الأذان. ولكن لو أخذ أحدٌ بعموم الحديث وقال: إنه ذِكْر؛ وما دام الحديث عاماً فلا مانع من أن أذكر الله ﷿. وقوله: «يُسَنُّ لسامعه متابعتُه سِرًّا»، صريحٌ بأنه لو ترك الإجابة عمداً فلا إثم عليه، وهذا هو الصَّحيح. وقال بعض أهل الظَّاهر: إن المتابعة واجبة، وإنه يجب على من سمع المؤذِّن أن يقول مثلَ ما يقول (٢). واستدلُّوا بالأمر: «إذا سمعتم المؤذِّن فقولوا مثل ما يقول» والأصل في الأمر الوجوب، ولكن الجمهور على خلاف ذلك (٣). واستدلَّ الجمهور بأنَّ النبيَّ ﷺ سمع مؤذِّناً يؤذِّن فقال: «على الفِطرة» (٤)، ولم يُنقل أنه أجابه أو تابعه، ولو كانت المُتابعة واجبة لفعلها الرَّسول ﵊ ولنُقِلَتْ إلينا.
(١) انظر: «الإنصاف» (٣/ ١٠٧)، «كشَّاف القناع» (١/ ٢٤٥). (٢) انظر: «المحلَّى» (٣/ ١٤٨). (٣) انظر: «المغني» (٢/ ٨٥)، «النكت على المحرر» (١/ ٣٨، ٣٩). (٤) رواه مسلم، وقد تقدَّم تخريجه ص (٤٧)، من حديث أنس بن مالك. وعندي دليلٌ أصرحُ من ذلك، وهو قولُ النبيِّ ﵊ لمالك بن الحُويرث ومن معه: «إذا حضرت الصَّلاةُ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies