Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Second: the need of the person entitled to maintenance.

Third: that they share the same religion, except in the case of the bond of manumission.

Fourth: that the provider of maintenance be an heir of the person entitled to it, whether by a fixed share or by agnatic inheritance, except in the direct line of ascent and descent.

It has previously been stated that the sounder view is that the provider of maintenance should be an heir of the person entitled to it, whether by a fixed share, agnatic inheritance, or kinship.

His statement, “And the father is obliged”: the word “upon” denotes obligation. As the scholars of legal theory have said, “upon” apparently indicates obligation, though it is not an explicit, unequivocal expression of it. Thus, if it is said, “It is upon you to do such-and-such,” this means that it is obligatory.

His statement, “to arrange nursing for his child”: the evidence is Allah’s saying: “Then if they suckle your children for you, give them their payment” [al-Talaq 65:6]. Thus, the father is obliged to arrange nursing for his child. The point of evidence in the verse is that Allah attributed their nursing to the father of the child, saying: “Then if they suckle your children for you, give them their payment.” Therefore, they are fulfilling on his behalf an obligation. This is also indicated by the underlying rationale: maintenance of the child is obligatory upon his father: “And upon the father of the child is the mothers’ provision and clothing according to what is acceptable” [al-Baqarah 2:233].

His statement, “for his child,” includes both males and females, because the term “child” includes both.

His statement, “and he must pay the wage”: this is because the wage is part of the children’s maintenance. The evidence for this is that the mother’s milk increases through the nourishment she receives from the provision given to her by the father of the child. The apparent meaning of the author’s words is that he must pay the wage whether the mother remains married to him or has been irrevocably divorced from him. Thus, if the mother asks her husband to pay the wage for nursing the child, even while she is still married to him, then he must pay.

الثاني: حاجة المنفَق عليه. الثالث: اتفاق الدين، إلاّ في الولاء. الرابع: أن يكون المنفِق وارثاً للمنفَق عليه بفرض أو تعصيب، إلاّ في عمودي النسب. وسبق أن الراجح أن يكون المنفِق وارثاً للمنفَق عليه بفرض، أو تعصيب، أو رحم. قوله: «وعلى الأب» «على» تفيد الوجوب كما قال علماء أصول الفقه: إن «على» ظاهرة في الوجوب، وليست نصاً صريحاً فيه، فإذا قيل: عليك أن تفعل، فمعناه أنه واجب. قوله: «أن يسترضع لولده» والدليل قوله تعالى: ﴿فَإِنْ أَرْضَعْنَ لَكُمْ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ﴾ [الطلاق: ٦]، فالأب عليه أن يسترضع لولده؛ ووجه الدلالة من الآية أن الله جعل إرضاعهن لأب الولد فقال: «﴿فَإِنْ أَرْضَعْنَ لَكُمْ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ﴾» إذاً فهُنَّ قائمات عنهم بواجب، ومن جهة التعليل؛ لأن الإنفاق على الطفل يجب على أبيه: ﴿وَعَلَى الْمَولُودِ لَهُ رِزْقُهُنَّ وَكِسْوَتُهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ﴾ [البقرة: ٢٣٣]. وقوله: «لولده» يشمل الذكر والأنثى؛ لأن «ولد» تشمل الذكر والأنثى. قوله: «ويؤدي الأجرة» لأن الأجرة هي نفقة الأولاد، والدليل على ذلك أن الأم يزيد لبنها بالتغذي بهذا الرزق الذي يعطيها المولود له، وظاهر كلام المؤلف أن عليه أن يؤدي الأجرة سواء كانت الأم معه، أو بائناً منه، فإذا طلبت الأم من زوجها أن يؤدي الأجرة عن إرضاع الولد، ولو كانت تحته، فعليه أن يؤدي

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies